02.09.2013 Views

stankovic, sasa thesis.pdf - Atrium - University of Guelph

stankovic, sasa thesis.pdf - Atrium - University of Guelph

stankovic, sasa thesis.pdf - Atrium - University of Guelph

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

these principles)” (Patton 288). In other words, becoming is inseparable from an affect. “For the<br />

affect is not a personal feeling, nor is it a characteristic; it is the effectuation <strong>of</strong> a power <strong>of</strong> the<br />

pack that throws the self into upheaval and makes it reel” (TP 240). Morality, specifically<br />

psychoanalysis, wants to stop the becoming <strong>of</strong> the living body. “The BwO howls: ‘They’ve made<br />

me an organism! They’ve wrongfully folded me! They’ve stolen my body!’ The judgment <strong>of</strong><br />

God uproots it from its immanence and makes it an organism, a signification, a subject” (TP<br />

159). On the other hand, Deleuze and Guattari argue, in favour <strong>of</strong> the becoming <strong>of</strong> the living<br />

body. “Where psychoanalysis says, ‘Stop, find yourself again,’ we should say instead, ‘Let’s go<br />

further still, we haven’t found our BwO yet, we haven’t sufficiently dismantled our self’...Find<br />

your body without organs. Find out how to make it. It’s a question <strong>of</strong> life and death, youth and<br />

old age, sadness and joy” (TP 151). It is in this sense that Capitalism and Schizophrenia is an<br />

ethical project. In the preface to Anti-Oedipus Foucault writes: “I would say that Anti-Oedipus<br />

(may its authors forgive me) is a book <strong>of</strong> ethics, the first book <strong>of</strong> ethics to be written in France in<br />

quite a long time” (AO xiii). This is an ethics <strong>of</strong> becoming. “He does not live nature as nature,<br />

but as a process <strong>of</strong> production. There is no such thing as either man or nature now, only a process<br />

that produces one within the other and couples the machines together. Producing-machines,<br />

desiring-machines everywhere, schizophrenic machines, all <strong>of</strong> species life: the self and the non-<br />

self, outside and inside, no longer have any meaning whatsoever” (AO 2). Perhaps in The Logic<br />

<strong>of</strong> Sense Deleuze describes the most extreme example <strong>of</strong> becoming.<br />

In The Logic <strong>of</strong> Sense Deleuze makes several ontological distinctions. In the first<br />

instance, he talks about bodies. The relationship among bodies is causality. “There are no causes<br />

and effects among bodies. Rather, all bodies are causes—causes in relation to each other” (LS 4).<br />

When bodies cause each other they mix and produce certain states <strong>of</strong> affairs. “First, there are<br />

240

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!