27.02.2014 Views

Libro

Libro

Libro

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MEDIA LITERACY AND INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE<br />

Strategies, Debates and Good Practices<br />

<br />

contextual perspective of culture -whose metaphor is represented in the ocean<br />

of Fang (2005-2006) -, that involves an approach to the visible aspects or<br />

cultural values, such as internal processes and the different moments of tension<br />

that can, under certain circumstances, become visible. d) A complex view of<br />

culture does not only fix his gaze on the national culture, but is concerned with<br />

the internal and external dynamics that shape, such as assumptions, values<br />

and behavior of individuals who are part of it and the culture of the groups 1 .<br />

The acceptance of Zhaocai Mao as a symbolic object by different cultural<br />

processes apart from those that actually comes demonstrate the three points<br />

raised by Fang (2005-2006) in which is established a paradoxical nature of<br />

culture, a cultural explanation that responds to a context and a specific time and<br />

a new identity of national cultures responding to globalization platform. The<br />

coexistence of paradoxical values –as it is showed by the Colombian immigrant<br />

woman who has a Zhaocai Mao next to the statue of Jesus at her homerequires<br />

the approach of an analytic stance that allows capturing the inner<br />

culture mechanism that is being built on a specific time and place. In the middle<br />

of this contextual perspective lies, without a doubt, the assessment that requires<br />

the adoption of the most appropriate dynamic for the explained situation and to<br />

determine, for example, the variation in working hours of the "Bazaar Zhong Yu"<br />

to fit to Sundays which generally in Spain are not working days.<br />

The assimilation of habits and objects, as a result of collision and cultural<br />

clashes permits, under the characteristics of the information society, the<br />

observation of the change processes in a more transparent way, although it<br />

requires a very high analytic speed to the rapid change that means the evident<br />

and daily collision between many cultures. Under a static perspective of the<br />

culture, different and fast processes that happen inside the globalization –the<br />

introduction of Zhaocai Mao in different Western shops 2 - will escape from the<br />

explanatory methodological frameworks that are part of a scientific perspective<br />

that appreciates the culture from a mechanic positioning (mechanic science),<br />

and therefore, which do not reach to measure the dynamic of a multicultural and<br />

global process.<br />

3. Cultural exploration in a economical crisis<br />

Cultural exploration -necessarily away of bipolar and exclusive visions and<br />

taking distance of dimensions and indicators that represent serious problems for<br />

measuring the diversity of the subject- finds in the Oriental tradition, according<br />

1 The fact that groups were analyzed, as stated by Fang (2005-2006), involves the assimilation<br />

of the philosophy of yin-yang to approach the understanding of the use and inclusion of the<br />

opposing forces within a given value system. Thus, the cultural groups that are mixed in those<br />

contrary forces are, to the author, four: national groups of specific cultures, ethnic groups in<br />

specific regions, organizational and industrial groups and groups of global cultures with<br />

common interests (2005-2006 and Fang Leung, 2005, in Fang, 2012: 6).<br />

2 The situation, by the way, coincides with a high degree of social distance (in the West<br />

European) in front of religious traditions, also caused by a high degree of exchange of cultural<br />

and symbolic information.<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!