26.04.2014 Views

(RFP) - Terminal Operator Services for the Statewide Fingerprint ...

(RFP) - Terminal Operator Services for the Statewide Fingerprint ...

(RFP) - Terminal Operator Services for the Statewide Fingerprint ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>RFP</strong> Appendix C,<br />

SOW Exhibit B-1<br />

<strong>RFP</strong>, APPENDIX C<br />

Page 2 of 4<br />

[CONTRACT, ATTACHMENT B, STATEMENT OF WORK EXHIBITS]<br />

e. Shows <strong>the</strong> quality assurance methods <strong>the</strong> County will use to evaluate <strong>the</strong><br />

Contractor’s per<strong>for</strong>mance in meeting <strong>the</strong> Contract requirements. (Column 5<br />

of chart).<br />

f. Shows <strong>the</strong> monthly Unsatisfactory Per<strong>for</strong>mance Indicator (UPI) points<br />

to be assessed <strong>for</strong> exceeding <strong>the</strong> AQL, <strong>for</strong> each listed Contract requirement<br />

(Column 6 of chart). These indicators may serve as a baseline <strong>for</strong> assessing<br />

liquidated damages.<br />

3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE<br />

Each month, Contractor per<strong>for</strong>mance will be compared to <strong>the</strong> contract standards<br />

and acceptable quality levels (AQLs) using <strong>the</strong> Quality Assurance Monitoring Plan<br />

(QAMP). County may use a variety of inspection methods to evaluate <strong>the</strong><br />

Contractor’s per<strong>for</strong>mance, including:<br />

3.1 Random sampling.<br />

3.2 One hundred percent (100%) inspection of items, such as reports and<br />

invoices, on a periodic basis (daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, semiannually<br />

or annually) as determined necessary to assure a sufficient<br />

evaluation of Contractor per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

3.3 Review of reports and files.<br />

3.4 Validated complaints from DPSS district offices and/or administrative staff,<br />

WFP&I and o<strong>the</strong>r agencies and County departments with whom Contractor<br />

has a relationship.<br />

3.5 SFIS Contractor complaints.<br />

3.6 On-site surveillance.<br />

4.0 CONTRACT DISCREPANCY REPORT (CDR)<br />

Per<strong>for</strong>mance of a listed service is considered acceptable when <strong>the</strong> number of<br />

discrepancies found during Contract monitoring procedures does not exceed <strong>the</strong><br />

number of discrepancies allowed by <strong>the</strong> AQL. When <strong>the</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance is<br />

unacceptable, <strong>the</strong> Contractor may be required to respond to a CDR as follows:<br />

4.1 Verbal notification of a Contract discrepancy will be made to <strong>the</strong> Contractor<br />

Program Manager or alternate as soon as possible whenever a Contract<br />

discrepancy is identified. When possible, <strong>the</strong> problem shall be immediately<br />

resolved by <strong>the</strong> Contract Manager. The CCA will determine whe<strong>the</strong>r a CDR<br />

(Contract Attachment B, SOW Exhibit B-3, CDR) will be issued.<br />

132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!