26.04.2014 Views

(RFP) - Terminal Operator Services for the Statewide Fingerprint ...

(RFP) - Terminal Operator Services for the Statewide Fingerprint ...

(RFP) - Terminal Operator Services for the Statewide Fingerprint ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS<br />

STATEWIDE FINGERPRINT IMAGING SYSTEM (SFIS) TERMINAL OPERATOR SERVICES<br />

of <strong>the</strong> following criteria:<br />

1. The person or entity requesting a Disqualification Review is a<br />

Proposer;<br />

2. The request <strong>for</strong> a Disqualification Review is submitted timely (i.e., by<br />

<strong>the</strong> date and time specified in <strong>the</strong> written determination); and<br />

3. The request <strong>for</strong> a Disqualification Review asserts that <strong>the</strong> Department's<br />

determination of disqualification due to non-responsiveness was<br />

erroneous (e.g. factual errors, etc.) and provides factual support on<br />

assertions.<br />

The Disqualification Review shall be completed and <strong>the</strong> determination<br />

shall be provided to <strong>the</strong> requesting Proposer, in writing, prior to <strong>the</strong><br />

conclusion of <strong>the</strong> evaluation process.<br />

3.4 BUSINESS PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND CRITERIA (55%)<br />

Any reviews conducted during <strong>the</strong> evaluation of <strong>the</strong> proposal may result in<br />

a point reduction.<br />

3.4.1 Proposer’s Qualifications (20 %)<br />

1) Proposer will be evaluated on <strong>the</strong>ir experience and capacity as<br />

a corporation or o<strong>the</strong>r entity to per<strong>for</strong>m <strong>the</strong> required services<br />

based on in<strong>for</strong>mation provided in Paragraph 2.9.4, Section<br />

B.1, of <strong>the</strong> proposal.<br />

2) Proposer will be evaluated on <strong>the</strong> verification of references<br />

provided in Section B.2 of <strong>the</strong> proposal. In addition to <strong>the</strong><br />

references provided, a review will include <strong>the</strong> County’s<br />

Contract Database and Contractor Alert Reporting Database,<br />

if applicable, reflecting past per<strong>for</strong>mance history on County or<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r contracts. This review may result in point deductions up<br />

to 100% of <strong>the</strong> total points awarded in this evaluation<br />

category. Additionally, a review of terminated contracts will be<br />

conducted which may result in point deductions<br />

3) A review will be conducted to determine <strong>the</strong> magnitude of any<br />

pending litigation or judgments against <strong>the</strong> Proposer as<br />

provided in Paragraph 2.9.4, Section B.3 of <strong>the</strong> proposal.<br />

3.4.2 Proposer’s Past Per<strong>for</strong>mance and Experience (10%)<br />

1) Relevance and suitability of <strong>the</strong> firm’s prior experience and<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance in providing similar services related to <strong>the</strong><br />

similar scope and size of this project.<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!