(RFP) - Terminal Operator Services for the Statewide Fingerprint ...
(RFP) - Terminal Operator Services for the Statewide Fingerprint ...
(RFP) - Terminal Operator Services for the Statewide Fingerprint ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS<br />
STATEWIDE FINGERPRINT IMAGING SYSTEM (SFIS) TERMINAL OPERATOR SERVICES<br />
Department's sole discretion, be denied if <strong>the</strong> request does not satisfy<br />
all of <strong>the</strong> following criteria:<br />
1) The person or entity requesting a Proposed Contractor Selection<br />
Review is a Proposer;<br />
2) The request <strong>for</strong> a Proposed Contractor Selection Review is<br />
submitted timely (i.e., by <strong>the</strong> date and time specified by <strong>the</strong><br />
Department);<br />
3) The person or entity requesting a Proposed Contractor Selection<br />
Review asserts in appropriate detail with factual reasons one or<br />
more of <strong>the</strong> following grounds <strong>for</strong> review:<br />
a) The Department materially failed to follow procedures<br />
specified in its solicitation document. This includes:<br />
(i)<br />
Failure to correctly apply <strong>the</strong> standards <strong>for</strong> reviewing <strong>the</strong><br />
proposal <strong>for</strong>mat requirements.<br />
(ii) Failure to correctly apply <strong>the</strong> standards, and/or follow<br />
<strong>the</strong> prescribed methods, <strong>for</strong> evaluating <strong>the</strong> proposals as<br />
specified in <strong>the</strong> solicitation document.<br />
(iii) Use of evaluation criteria that were different from <strong>the</strong><br />
evaluation criteria disclosed in <strong>the</strong> solicitation<br />
document.<br />
b) The Department made identifiable ma<strong>the</strong>matical or o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
errors in evaluating proposals, resulting in <strong>the</strong> Proposer<br />
receiving an incorrect score and not being selected as <strong>the</strong><br />
recommended contractor.<br />
c) A member of <strong>the</strong> Evaluation Committee demonstrated bias in<br />
<strong>the</strong> conduct of <strong>the</strong> evaluation<br />
d) Ano<strong>the</strong>r basis <strong>for</strong> review as provided by state or federal law;<br />
and<br />
4) The request <strong>for</strong> a Proposed Contractor Selection Review sets<br />
<strong>for</strong>th sufficient detail to demonstrate that, but <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Department's<br />
alleged failure, <strong>the</strong> Proposer would have been <strong>the</strong> lowest cost,<br />
responsive and responsible bid or <strong>the</strong> highest-scored proposal, as<br />
<strong>the</strong> case may be.<br />
Upon completing <strong>the</strong> Proposed Contractor Selection Review, <strong>the</strong><br />
Department representative shall issue a written decision to <strong>the</strong><br />
Proposer within a reasonable time following receipt of <strong>the</strong> request<br />
<strong>for</strong> a Proposed Contractor Selection Review, and always be<strong>for</strong>e<br />
51