30.05.2014 Views

Coincidance - Principia Discordia

Coincidance - Principia Discordia

Coincidance - Principia Discordia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

COINCIDANCE 151<br />

13. When my play Illuminatus opened on the Liverpool street so strangely<br />

linked with jung-beetle-Beatle coincidences, the premiere was November 23.<br />

British playwright Heathcote Williams made a guest appearance as a walkon.<br />

Later, Williams and 1 talked about other writers we knew, and<br />

Burroughs was mentioned, along with the 23 coincidences he had collected<br />

(only a few of which are mentioned above). Williams told me that when he<br />

met Burroughs this subject came up, because Williams had mentioned that<br />

he was 23 years old at the time. When Williams returned to his flat that<br />

night (he had recently moved), he noticed for the first time that the building<br />

across the street was number 23.<br />

14. After Koestler's Roofs of Coincidence was published, Professor Hans<br />

Zeisel, of the University of Chicago law school, wrote to Koestler about a<br />

whole chain of 23s that had haunted his life: he lived at Rossaurerlaende 23<br />

in Vienna, he had a law office at Gonzagagasse 23, his mother lived at<br />

Alserstrasse 23. Once Zeisel's mother was given a novel, Die Liebe Der Jeanne<br />

Ney, and took it with her to Monte Carlo, In the book, a character wins a<br />

great deal by betting on 23 at roulette. Zeisel's mother decided to bet on 23<br />

at roulette. Twenty-three came up on the second try.<br />

15. This whole area, as if it weren't bizarre enough already, took on even<br />

more exotic aspects after a celebrated experiment by Robert Harvie and<br />

biologist Sir Alister Hardy that attempted to demonstrate the reality of<br />

telepathy so totally that the last skeptic would be overwhelmed. The<br />

experiment, conducted in London in 1967, involved 110 trials with 20<br />

subjects in each. Using every possible safeguard to ensure rigorousness,<br />

Harvie and Hardy obtained marvelous results. The subjects, trying to guess<br />

or "telepathically" read target cards they could not see, scored well above<br />

what might have been expected from chance.<br />

Then, as a control, Harvie and Hardy randomized the response sheets.<br />

That is, instead of just comparing the responses of 20 people who were<br />

trying to "see" an invisible target card, as in the experiment proper, Harvie<br />

and Hardy made up groups of 20 response sheets from different people in<br />

different trials. This, they hoped, would prove that chance alone could not<br />

account for the results of the telepathy trials.<br />

SHOCKING CORRELATIONS<br />

What appeared was more shocking than what came out of the initial<br />

experiments. Correlations above chance were found again—correlations<br />

Wildly beyond what could be expected according to probability theory.<br />

What we have here is worse than telepathy from the orthodox view-<br />

Point. Randomizing should have produced fewer correlations, according to<br />

one application of the second law of thermodynamics, which says that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!