30.05.2014 Views

Coincidance - Principia Discordia

Coincidance - Principia Discordia

Coincidance - Principia Discordia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COINCIDANCE 189<br />

J.R.A. leaders about such a truce when he was shot, you know. The British<br />

may have thought that if the civil war went on long enough, it would<br />

destroy the Free State.<br />

Why do you think the British signed the Treaty of 1921 at all? After crushing one Irish<br />

rebellion after another for 800 years, why did they suddenly feel, when they still had a<br />

world-wide Empire, that they couldn't crush the 1918-21 rebellion?<br />

The I.R.A. had made it impossible for them to remain here. By 1921, we<br />

had succeeded miliatrily in making their position untenable without a mass<br />

military occupation and repressive measures on a scale that would have<br />

been very unpopular in the United States and with a large segment of<br />

British public opinion. As it was, in the United States, support for the Irish<br />

liberation movement was very extensive and could not be ignored.<br />

Your own solution to the cultural conflicts in the North is the so-called Swiss proposal or<br />

cantonization. Would you explain that?<br />

It is not my solution exactly; it was first proposed as early as 1922, when<br />

the first Irish Constitution was being drafted, and it was the suggestion of<br />

Professor Edward C'Rahilly. Unfortunately, it was not adequately discussed<br />

and debated at the time. I think we accepted the British centralized system of<br />

government, wrongly, because we had been dominated by the British for<br />

800 years and were still thinking in British categories. The Swiss system is<br />

much better for small countries like Switzerland or Ireland, 1 think, and it is<br />

especially appropriate where you have two strongly opposed religious/cultural<br />

traditions. Adopting the Swiss system, we would have 32 independent<br />

counties, like the independent Swiss cantons, and each would have its own<br />

parliament and make its own laws on all matters except international<br />

relations. A small central government would have representatives from the<br />

independent cantons and they would be concerned only with external<br />

affairs. Such devolution and decentralization is the only viable path for a<br />

nation with two religious traditions; it has worked very well for Switzerland.<br />

Tha t is why I revived this proposal and presented it to the New Ireland<br />

Forum last year.<br />

You have written a great deal lately about unemployment which you say is a problem that<br />

will not go away . . .<br />

The computer revolution is changing all our traditional economic<br />

assumptions. There will be more unemployment from now on, not less. No<br />

government has a solution to this; mostly they are afraid to even think<br />

about it. What 1 keep proposing is that they should create jobs by investing<br />

in projects that do not present an immediate economic return. Reforestation<br />

is my favorite example. That's why I'm involved with the "Trees for Ireland

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!