30.05.2014 Views

Coincidance - Principia Discordia

Coincidance - Principia Discordia

Coincidance - Principia Discordia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

206 COINCIDANCE<br />

Dali, who had a Jewish wife and fled France as soon as Hitler invaded, was<br />

speaking in a totally dispassionate and non-aristotelian fashion when he<br />

"defended" the monster. Hitler did indeed have four balls and six foreskins,<br />

in the same sense that Lenin had one giant buttock, as in Daii's famous<br />

painting of him. Perhaps Daii's attitude toward Hitler would have been<br />

clearer if he had painted it, as he painted his attitude toward Lenin, instead of<br />

trying to verbalize the ineffable. After all, if one Russian General gets shot<br />

by a man with the same name as America's leading conservative and<br />

another gets shot by a man with the same name as the chap who proved<br />

Irish was an Indo-European language, it is only logical that a third Russian<br />

General should heist the Maltese Falcon, right?<br />

But seriously, folks—as Bob Hope used to say—the method used by Tzara<br />

in breaking the back of Aristotelianism was the same method used by Claud<br />

Shannon in discovering the mathematical definition of information. Look it<br />

up in Shannon's The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Dr. Shannon cut up<br />

prose into single words, threw them in a hat, picked them out one at a time—<br />

just like Tristan without Isolde creating a Dada poem—and from this<br />

Shannon produced not poetry but the ideas that allowed him to define<br />

information as the opposite of predictability. The basic equation is elegant,<br />

and is given also in my book Right Where You Are Silting Now and it was this<br />

mathematical analysis that made possible the word processor on which I am<br />

writing this.<br />

That this word processor is called a Mackintosh—like the man who haunts<br />

Bloom all through 16 June 1904—is "only" a coincidence, of course. Of course.<br />

Painters explored collage extensively in the 40 years after Tzara's breakthrough,<br />

and every motion picture director conducted extensive research in<br />

montage, but prose and poetry, with few exceptions {Joyce, Pound, Williams)<br />

moved backward like a crab and crawled into the Victorian or pre-<br />

Einsteinian murk. The second quantum leap occurred in the late 1950s<br />

when William S. Burroughs began experimenting with the cut-up and<br />

fold-in techniques and created a prose of incredible accidental beauty and<br />

Zen humor.<br />

I have used various cut-up and other stochastic techniques in all my novels<br />

and have noticed one amusing thing about the response to this: hostility is<br />

expressed most widely if I admit that I am using "mechanical" techniques of<br />

the Burroughs and Tzara variety. If I do not publicize this fact, there is much<br />

less hostility. It appears that lazy readers are only terrified of the new if they<br />

are warned in advance that it actually is novel and experimental. Otherwise<br />

they just pass over it as a confusing passage and forget it. I am not interested<br />

in lazy readers, however, but in the attentive and awake.<br />

The techniques used in creating the following experiment were not possible

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!