- Page 1 and 2:
Territorial Review Copenhagen Preli
- Page 3 and 4:
3 Acknowledgements This Review was
- Page 5 and 6:
5 Table of contents Chapter 1: The
- Page 7 and 8:
7 Assessment and Recommendations Co
- Page 9 and 10:
9 Its international ranking is mixe
- Page 11 and 12:
11 The lack of skill is of paramoun
- Page 13 and 14:
13 qualifications of immigrants and
- Page 15 and 16:
15 more than twice average full-tim
- Page 17 and 18:
17 Commercialisation of research co
- Page 19 and 20:
19 surpassed only by Spain and Swed
- Page 21 and 22:
21 in the suburban periphery, while
- Page 23 and 24:
23 emissions by 25% since 1990 and
- Page 25 and 26:
25 and the other municipalities in
- Page 27 and 28:
27 instruments at its disposal. A s
- Page 29 and 30:
29 Chapter 1: The competitiveness o
- Page 31 and 32:
31 Figure 1.2. Map of Copenhagen an
- Page 33 and 34:
33 other areas in Denmark are more
- Page 35 and 36:
35 Figure 1.5. Map of Copenhagen an
- Page 37 and 38:
37 Figure 1.7. Regional GDP in % of
- Page 39 and 40:
39 Copenhagen plays a crucial role
- Page 41 and 42:
41 Figure 1.8. Monthly unemployment
- Page 43 and 44:
43 Figure 1.10. Co-patents between
- Page 45 and 46:
45 Table 1.4. Employment and value-
- Page 47 and 48:
47 Table 1.6. Overview of studies o
- Page 49 and 50:
49 capital. As Table 1.7 shows, the
- Page 51 and 52:
Rank Total Accounting Advertising F
- Page 53 and 54:
53 Potential of a more integrated
- Page 55 and 56:
55 Figure 1.12. Economic growth in
- Page 57 and 58:
57 If a broader definition of econo
- Page 59 and 60:
59 …but is only moderately succes
- Page 61 and 62: 61 Region. The variation in tertiar
- Page 63 and 64: 63 Education and skills Education o
- Page 65 and 66: 65 Øresund as part of the solution
- Page 67 and 68: 67 Under-utilisation of immigrants
- Page 69 and 70: 69 Figure 1.18. Share of foreign-bo
- Page 71 and 72: 71 the countries that attract the m
- Page 73 and 74: 73 both the public and private sect
- Page 75 and 76: 75 figures in the THES rankings of
- Page 77 and 78: 77 (FORA, 2008). This is in line wi
- Page 79 and 80: 79 most other OECD countries (OECD,
- Page 81 and 82: 81 Several OECD countries score bet
- Page 83 and 84: 83 fewest procedures in the world f
- Page 85 and 86: 85 recorded in the OECD (OECD, 1999
- Page 87 and 88: 87 50 000 population; New Zealand:
- Page 89 and 90: 89 ensuring that these 38 000 dwell
- Page 91 and 92: 91 progress has been made - the lev
- Page 93 and 94: 93 the region‘s groundwater aquif
- Page 95 and 96: 95 rising sea levels (which could r
- Page 97 and 98: Car theft per 1000 inhabitants (200
- Page 99 and 100: 99 challenges, such as delays and c
- Page 101 and 102: 101 Figure 1.34. Congestion in sele
- Page 103 and 104: immigrants and students, who enter
- Page 105 and 106: 105 8 Copenhagen metropolitan regio
- Page 107 and 108: 107 ranking rates 200 universities
- Page 109 and 110: 109 32 One notable exception is the
- Page 111: 111 44 Københavns Energi (Copenhag
- Page 115 and 116: 115 traffic and environment plannin
- Page 117 and 118: 117 competitiveness of the Capital
- Page 119 and 120: 119 Core Cities‘ efforts to drive
- Page 121 and 122: 121 established in the fingers them
- Page 123 and 124: 123 were strong competitiveness and
- Page 125 and 126: 125 fair list of actions to be take
- Page 127 and 128: 127 population. The partnership agr
- Page 129 and 130: 129 whose aim is to construct a bot
- Page 131 and 132: 131 Box 2.2. Copenhagen Model for I
- Page 133 and 134: 133 Evaluation of labour market int
- Page 135 and 136: 135 system. One of the constraining
- Page 137 and 138: 137 Several initiatives have been t
- Page 139 and 140: 139 a number of industrial research
- Page 141 and 142: 141 Copenhagen Area funded partly b
- Page 143 and 144: 143 Figure 2.2. Creative zones in C
- Page 145 and 146: 145 financial incentives and fundin
- Page 147 and 148: 147 Not much functional overlap see
- Page 149 and 150: 149 Box 2.3. Regional spillovers of
- Page 151 and 152: 151 and which will link the Danish
- Page 153 and 154: 153 Figure 2.3. The finger plan in
- Page 155 and 156: 155 might be regarded as an emergin
- Page 157 and 158: 157 Box 2.5 Some examples of conges
- Page 159 and 160: 159 types entering the central Cong
- Page 161 and 162: 161 not only in the city of Copenha
- Page 163 and 164:
163 southern Sweden remains fairly
- Page 165 and 166:
165 operation of the bridge will ge
- Page 167 and 168:
167 housing demand. In 2005, it was
- Page 169 and 170:
169 Aside from a regional focus, th
- Page 171 and 172:
171 allowing planning authorities t
- Page 173 and 174:
173 Capital Region together with th
- Page 175 and 176:
175 high-risk areas where more than
- Page 177 and 178:
177 regional housing allocation for
- Page 179 and 180:
179 Copenhagen‘s workforce bicycl
- Page 181 and 182:
181 times in the municipality of Co
- Page 183 and 184:
183 façades, and street furniture.
- Page 185 and 186:
185 square is nearly void of green
- Page 187 and 188:
187 2000 year levels by 2008 (2,776
- Page 189 and 190:
189 2.7.3 Cultural policies Since t
- Page 191 and 192:
191 combined with a good quality of
- Page 193 and 194:
193 2.8. Conclusion There appear to
- Page 195 and 196:
195 NOTES 1 Those projects started
- Page 197 and 198:
197 flows in the historical core an
- Page 199 and 200:
199 compact, higher-density growth
- Page 201 and 202:
201 35 Avedøre Stationsby is a tow
- Page 203:
203 Danish Ministry of Environment
- Page 206 and 207:
206 Figure 3.1. Sub-national expend
- Page 208 and 209:
208 Figure 3.2. Expenditure shares
- Page 210 and 211:
210 Figure 3.3. Main budget items o
- Page 212 and 213:
212 Municipal fragmentation in Cope
- Page 214 and 215:
214 Ministry of Environment. Althou
- Page 216 and 217:
216 Copenhagen Authority, represent
- Page 218 and 219:
218 only to a limited extent on the
- Page 220 and 221:
220 national level. 4 This election
- Page 222 and 223:
222 region. In practice, this means
- Page 224 and 225:
224 Figure 3.7. Sub-national tax re
- Page 226 and 227:
226 3.3.1 Fiscal equalisation Like
- Page 228 and 229:
228 OECD country. In a majority of
- Page 230 and 231:
230 volume of these issues are capa
- Page 232 and 233:
232 recruitment, high turnover and
- Page 234 and 235:
234 While changing demographics wil
- Page 236 and 237:
236 remuneration, a focus on connec
- Page 238 and 239:
238 have been made to be more clien
- Page 240 and 241:
240 NOTES 1 In addition, 9% is spen
- Page 242 and 243:
242 Relevance of urban competitiven
- Page 244 and 245:
244 be most important to urban area
- Page 246 and 247:
246 Although these models might wor
- Page 248 and 249:
248 States between 1860 and 1987 at
- Page 250 and 251:
250 of universities is to produce c
- Page 252 and 253:
252 growth. Similar findings were f
- Page 254 and 255:
254 An extensive literature exists
- Page 256 and 257:
256 crime corresponds to a 1% decli
- Page 258 and 259:
258 The industries in a given regio
- Page 260 and 261:
260 Conclusion There is a solid bas
- Page 262 and 263:
262 Andersen, J. (2005), ―Gamblin
- Page 264 and 265:
264 Bruun, F. (1995), ―Dilemmas o
- Page 266 and 267:
266 The City of Copenhagen (2005),
- Page 268 and 269:
268 Damm, A.P. and M. Rosholm (2005
- Page 270 and 271:
270 Economic Council (2001), ―Cha
- Page 272 and 273:
272 Glaeser, E. and J. Kohlhase (20
- Page 274 and 275:
274 Huggins, R., A. Johnston and R.
- Page 276 and 277:
276 Löfgren, O. (2008), Regionauts
- Page 278 and 279:
278 Ministry of Trade and Industry
- Page 280 and 281:
280 Ottaviano, G. and D. Pinelli (2
- Page 282 and 283:
282 Schmidt, T.D. (2005), Cross-bor
- Page 284:
284 Vickerman, R., K. Spiekermann a