08.06.2014 Views

Territorial Review Copenhagen - Region Hovedstaden

Territorial Review Copenhagen - Region Hovedstaden

Territorial Review Copenhagen - Region Hovedstaden

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

184<br />

Denmark's National Board of Health could better promote bicycling use in<br />

cities such as <strong>Copenhagen</strong> through educating the public on the health<br />

benefits of bicycling. Public health professionals could also be better<br />

engaged in the urban planning arena though participating in zoning<br />

decisions, serving on urban planning boards, and incorporating health into<br />

urban planning decision-making. Given the Capital <strong>Region</strong>'s mandate for<br />

hospitals, regional authorities could potentially play a stronger role in<br />

strengthening the interface between bicycle planning and public health.<br />

Enhancing landscape ecology<br />

The demarcation of entire green areas, such as that enshrined in<br />

<strong>Copenhagen</strong>‘s Finger Plan, could be coupled with improved landscape<br />

ecology throughout the urban fabric. Principles of landscape ecology might<br />

be better integrated into the siting and design of individual developments to<br />

minimise the presence of large areas of paving that are void of trees and<br />

vegetation. The tangible forms that these strategies may take are varied.<br />

Many cities, such as Berlin and Freiburg, have funded extensive treeplanting<br />

programs since the 1970s. New York City has followed this<br />

example through the MillionTreesNYC public-private partnership, which<br />

enlists citizens to identify areas for tree-planting and volunteer towards the<br />

planting of one million trees. This growing urban forest has reduced energy<br />

costs, increased storm-water capture, and lessened air pollution<br />

(MillionTreesNYC, 2008). Green roofs or eco-roofs also hold considerable<br />

potential and can be constructed using different designs, such as ―roof<br />

garden intensive‖ (deep soil with irrigation) or ―green roof extensive‖ (thin<br />

soil without irrigation). Green roofs are used more extensively in cities in<br />

Germany, the Netherlands, and Austria, than in <strong>Copenhagen</strong>. 44 Linz, for<br />

example, frequently requires buildings to compensate for the loss of<br />

greenspace through the promotion or requirement of buildings to install<br />

green roofs. Since the late 1980s, the City has often paid up to 35% of the<br />

cost to install green roofs on private residences and commercial buildings.<br />

While in 2009 it will be possible to apply for support for green roof projects<br />

through the Eco City Foundation/Den Byøkologiske Fond, the city does not<br />

have the possibility of providing tax incentives, which would be a strong<br />

incentive. Other urban greening enhancements that <strong>Copenhagen</strong> may more<br />

aggressively pursue include shrubbery, green courtyards, greenwalls, urban<br />

gardens and the construction of green buildings (Beatley, 2000). The City of<br />

<strong>Copenhagen</strong> could identify the most ―green-less‖ sites through using the<br />

Danish Building Research Institute‘s ―biofactor‖ rating system for urban<br />

greenery.<br />

The central square of <strong>Copenhagen</strong> (Rådhuspladsen) needs to better<br />

reflect the region‘s commitment to environmental health. Currently the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!