08.06.2014 Views

Territorial Review Copenhagen - Region Hovedstaden

Territorial Review Copenhagen - Region Hovedstaden

Territorial Review Copenhagen - Region Hovedstaden

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

248<br />

States between 1860 and 1987 at the state level is 0.64. Dumais et al. (1997)<br />

show that for US industries at the three-digit level, patterns of agglomeration<br />

have been rather stable over time.<br />

There has been a long ongoing debate on the consequences of city<br />

specialisation, that is: the relative importance of localisation economies<br />

versus urbanisation economies. Localisation economies are the benefits to<br />

be derived from firms of the same sector locating in each other‘s proximity.<br />

Urbanisation economies are the benefits to be derived from firms locating in<br />

the proximity of a wide array of other necessarily related firms.<br />

Specialisation has both advantages and disadvantages. The advantages are<br />

less urban crowding and stronger localisation economies arising from the<br />

proximity of closely related producers. The disadvantages are less<br />

innovation and more exposure to risk as the fortunes of specific sectors and<br />

technologies rise or fall. Specialised cities are exposed to a greater risk with<br />

the rise and fall of specific sectors and technologies (Duranton and Puga,<br />

2000).The empirical literature suggests that both economic specialisation<br />

and economic diversity in cities may play an important role in fostering<br />

innovation either in different industrial contexts or at different phases of the<br />

product life cycle.<br />

Glaeser et al. (1992) found evidence that cross-industry intellectual<br />

externalities were particularly important for urban growth. They find that<br />

diversity and local competition foster urban employment growth, whereas<br />

specialisation reduces urban employment growth. This finding could in part<br />

be a reflection of the recent relative decline in traditional manufacturing<br />

employment in the United States. The relative importance of specialisation<br />

and diversity, however, remains ambiguous and unresolved. If knowledge<br />

spillovers are the focus, diversity may well be advantageous. If employment<br />

impacts are the issue, specialisation in the ―right‖ sectors of the moment<br />

may be best (Cheshire and Malecki, 2004).<br />

Henderson (1997) has shown that large cities are on average more<br />

specialised in services (finance, insurance and real estate sectors), and less<br />

in manufacturing than medium-sized cities. Medium-sized cities are more<br />

specialised in mature industries (textiles, food, pulp and paper) and less in<br />

new industries (such as electronic components and instruments). Most<br />

creations take place in diversified cities. Trial plants are overwhelmingly<br />

located in major metropolitan areas, whereas mass-production plants are<br />

almost always located in smaller cities or rural areas.<br />

Both diversified and specialised urban environments are important in<br />

systems of cities. There is a role for each type of local economic<br />

environment, but at different stages of a firm‘s life-cycle. Diversified cities<br />

are more suited to the early stages of a product‘s life-cycle, whereas more

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!