Territorial Review Copenhagen - Region Hovedstaden
Territorial Review Copenhagen - Region Hovedstaden
Territorial Review Copenhagen - Region Hovedstaden
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
248<br />
States between 1860 and 1987 at the state level is 0.64. Dumais et al. (1997)<br />
show that for US industries at the three-digit level, patterns of agglomeration<br />
have been rather stable over time.<br />
There has been a long ongoing debate on the consequences of city<br />
specialisation, that is: the relative importance of localisation economies<br />
versus urbanisation economies. Localisation economies are the benefits to<br />
be derived from firms of the same sector locating in each other‘s proximity.<br />
Urbanisation economies are the benefits to be derived from firms locating in<br />
the proximity of a wide array of other necessarily related firms.<br />
Specialisation has both advantages and disadvantages. The advantages are<br />
less urban crowding and stronger localisation economies arising from the<br />
proximity of closely related producers. The disadvantages are less<br />
innovation and more exposure to risk as the fortunes of specific sectors and<br />
technologies rise or fall. Specialised cities are exposed to a greater risk with<br />
the rise and fall of specific sectors and technologies (Duranton and Puga,<br />
2000).The empirical literature suggests that both economic specialisation<br />
and economic diversity in cities may play an important role in fostering<br />
innovation either in different industrial contexts or at different phases of the<br />
product life cycle.<br />
Glaeser et al. (1992) found evidence that cross-industry intellectual<br />
externalities were particularly important for urban growth. They find that<br />
diversity and local competition foster urban employment growth, whereas<br />
specialisation reduces urban employment growth. This finding could in part<br />
be a reflection of the recent relative decline in traditional manufacturing<br />
employment in the United States. The relative importance of specialisation<br />
and diversity, however, remains ambiguous and unresolved. If knowledge<br />
spillovers are the focus, diversity may well be advantageous. If employment<br />
impacts are the issue, specialisation in the ―right‖ sectors of the moment<br />
may be best (Cheshire and Malecki, 2004).<br />
Henderson (1997) has shown that large cities are on average more<br />
specialised in services (finance, insurance and real estate sectors), and less<br />
in manufacturing than medium-sized cities. Medium-sized cities are more<br />
specialised in mature industries (textiles, food, pulp and paper) and less in<br />
new industries (such as electronic components and instruments). Most<br />
creations take place in diversified cities. Trial plants are overwhelmingly<br />
located in major metropolitan areas, whereas mass-production plants are<br />
almost always located in smaller cities or rural areas.<br />
Both diversified and specialised urban environments are important in<br />
systems of cities. There is a role for each type of local economic<br />
environment, but at different stages of a firm‘s life-cycle. Diversified cities<br />
are more suited to the early stages of a product‘s life-cycle, whereas more