08.06.2014 Views

Territorial Review Copenhagen - Region Hovedstaden

Territorial Review Copenhagen - Region Hovedstaden

Territorial Review Copenhagen - Region Hovedstaden

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

90<br />

(such as the former <strong>Copenhagen</strong> County and Frederiksborg County), as well<br />

as for migration to areas now in the Sjaelland region, such as the former<br />

Roskilde County. 36 Given lower prices in Malmö and surrounding Swedish<br />

areas, after the construction of the Øresund Bridge, approximately 3 000<br />

people have moved from <strong>Copenhagen</strong> to Malmö each year (Andersen,<br />

2007). Of particular concern are the numbers of families that are leaving<br />

<strong>Copenhagen</strong>: 55% of the couples who decide to leave the city of<br />

<strong>Copenhagen</strong> have children. 37 Without sufficient workforce housing in<br />

<strong>Copenhagen</strong>, the city‘s ongoing problems recruiting for jobs in the social<br />

care sector, day care centres and primary schools are likely to increase. If<br />

households in the middle-income group continue to move away, it will be<br />

even more difficult to fill municipal positions in the City of <strong>Copenhagen</strong> and<br />

to prevent social polarisation. The potential for workforce housing policies<br />

to remedy this situation will be explored later in this <strong>Review</strong>.<br />

Figure 1.27. Net outmigration from the city of <strong>Copenhagen</strong> to surrounding<br />

counties, 1980-2006<br />

Source: OECD Secretariat‘s calculations on the basis of data from Statistics Denmark<br />

Environmental quality<br />

<strong>Copenhagen</strong>‘s air quality is not among the best in selected OECD cities.<br />

<strong>Copenhagen</strong> has one of the lowest sulphur concentrations, but with regards<br />

to the concentrations of nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter, many<br />

similar-sized cities in the OECD of fewer than 2.5 million inhabitants are<br />

doing better (Figure 1.28). Even large cities such as Paris, London and<br />

Frankfurt have managed to achieve lower concentrations of particulate<br />

matter (PM). In 2005, the limit for daily average value for PM10 (50 μg/m3)<br />

was exceeded 64 times in the city of <strong>Copenhagen</strong>, 29 more than the EU<br />

permitted threshold (Teknik og Miljøforvaltningen KK, 2007). Though

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!