08.06.2014 Views

Territorial Review Copenhagen - Region Hovedstaden

Territorial Review Copenhagen - Region Hovedstaden

Territorial Review Copenhagen - Region Hovedstaden

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

157<br />

Box 2.5 Some examples of congestion charges in OECD countries<br />

Road pricing is a programme whereby the government directly charges users<br />

for using a congested section of a transportation network during a congested<br />

time. Road pricing attracts more attention because of the rather recent<br />

introduction of congestion charges in London and Stockholm. The purpose of<br />

the congestion charge is not only financing and funding road infrastructure but<br />

also introducing demand management in transportation system. By charging for<br />

use of the congested section and hours, government can deter drivers from using<br />

those sections. Reducing the impact of the congested traffic on the environment<br />

and health is often an additional objective. Governments often use revenues<br />

generated by the charge for the expansion and improvement of mass transit<br />

network.<br />

The case of London has been widely analysed in public policy debate. The<br />

following conditions made the implementation feasible in the context of<br />

London.<br />

<br />

<br />

Severe transportation bottlenecks in the city centre: road congestion<br />

was severe, while the expansions of roads were extremely difficult<br />

because of the already crowded built environment.<br />

Transportation structure (cars and other modes of transport):<br />

Relatively good alternatives to private cars existed, such as walking,<br />

cycling, taxi, bus, and subway. Only about 10% of peak period trips<br />

were made by private car. Many of the automobile commuters were<br />

living outside the city. The city did not have much residential<br />

population inside the area compared to the outer area. While a wide<br />

array of people benefited from the congestion decrease, the people<br />

who elected to pay the congestion charge were limited.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Political will: The leadership of Mayor Ken Livingstone was strong<br />

and consistent through the process. He also integrated the congestion<br />

charge into the wider scheme of London Plan and Mayor‘s Transport<br />

Strategy, to make his claim convincing and appealing.<br />

Legislative support from the national government: The national<br />

government provided the Greater London Authority (GLA) with the<br />

authority to introduce the congestion charge through the Greater<br />

London Authority Act of 1999 and Transport Act of 2000.<br />

Extensive public consultation: The GLA ensured understanding and<br />

support of the public and business in the decision-making process.<br />

Appropriate institutional setting: A professional team in Transport for<br />

London supported the management of system.<br />

Technological development: Technological development and the<br />

accompanying price decrease of facilities for congestion charge<br />

management made the implementation feasible.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!