08.06.2014 Views

Territorial Review Copenhagen - Region Hovedstaden

Territorial Review Copenhagen - Region Hovedstaden

Territorial Review Copenhagen - Region Hovedstaden

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

156<br />

but it does not have clear prioritisation of infrastructures and does not cover<br />

every mode of transport. Because a seamless intermodal transportation<br />

network affects the competitiveness of logistic sector, which many<br />

economic sectors depend on, the national government could benefit from a<br />

tool for co-ordination and prioritisation of every mode of transport, in<br />

accordance with business requirements. 13<br />

Institutional fragmentation of the metropolitan region poses a significant<br />

challenge, making an integral vision on transport modes and their<br />

connection difficult. Currently, no integrated transportation infrastructure<br />

system exists; several actors within the transportation field need to cooperate<br />

with each other. National and municipal governments are<br />

responsible for roads, based on the Danish Roads Act. The national<br />

government is largely responsible for the commuter train (S train) and<br />

regional trains. The national government, City of <strong>Copenhagen</strong> and the City<br />

of Frederiksberg own the metro based on separate legislation. However, a<br />

regional co-ordination mechanism is beginning to emerge. Since 2007, a<br />

single operator (Movia) has managed the public bus service in Sjaelland. It<br />

is owned by the two regions (the Capital <strong>Region</strong> and Sjaelland region) and<br />

the municipalities, who nominate the nine members of the board. This<br />

operator has full responsibility for total planning, including the pricing<br />

scheme, while each of 47 municipalities in the coverage area has<br />

responsibility for the operation and financing of bus service within the<br />

administrative boundary. Evidence suggests that this financing makes it<br />

difficult to agree on collective initiatives, such as marketing, because all<br />

costs have to be borne by the regions. Integrated transportation planning is<br />

increasingly necessary at the metropolitan level, as the development of each<br />

mode affects the others. Decision-making should be co-ordinated at strategic<br />

and operational level. Beyond the <strong>Copenhagen</strong> metropolitan area, crossborder<br />

co-ordination of transportation planning will also increasingly<br />

become necessary.<br />

Congestion charge in discussion<br />

Reflecting the regional scale of the congestion problem, congestion<br />

charges have been discussed extensively in the <strong>Copenhagen</strong> area over the<br />

last decade. Congestion charges have been introduced in several cities all<br />

over the world. Singapore has long and comprehensive experience and<br />

London, Oslo and Stockholm have followed suit. Like many cities in the<br />

OECD, <strong>Copenhagen</strong> is reflecting on the introduction of some form of<br />

congestion charges. Several surveys and analyses have been carried out that<br />

suggest a strong basis for decision-making on this matter. Different layouts<br />

of toll rings, multi-cordon systems and kilometre-based charging using GPS<br />

have been investigated and compared through field experiment (Rich and<br />

Nielsen, 2007).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!