28.06.2014 Views

The Implementation of a Model of Person-Centred Practice In Older ...

The Implementation of a Model of Person-Centred Practice In Older ...

The Implementation of a Model of Person-Centred Practice In Older ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> a model <strong>of</strong> person-centred practice in older person settings<br />

“I really like this way <strong>of</strong> learning, it’s more inclusive usually when I attend<br />

study days I just sit and don’t get involved to much”.<br />

<strong>In</strong> summary, the existing culture in the sites was such that at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme sustained attention had to be given to enabling each person, regardless<br />

<strong>of</strong> their role, an opportunity to believe in their self-worth, find and use in positive ways<br />

their voice both in the programme days and in the workplace. Further, the morale <strong>of</strong><br />

the groups tended to be very low and the self-belief also very low. Participants lived<br />

with a huge gap between what they wanted to do for residents and how they actually<br />

worked. Participants tended to express high levels <strong>of</strong> powerlessness and very low<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> engagement and empowerment.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was a huge focus on<br />

concerns such as rules, perceptions about management and what wasn’t allowed,<br />

obstacles and reasons why things couldn’t be done. <strong>The</strong> most common themes were<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> staff and lack <strong>of</strong> time. <strong>The</strong>re was a variety <strong>of</strong> evidence indicating that staff<br />

worked to a routinised even ritualistic culture that was in many ways harmful even<br />

brutal for them and for older people. Examples from the programme records from<br />

different participants at four sites:<br />

“We won’t be able to deliver on what we promise”<br />

“It’s too much work”<br />

“I don’t think other staff will take to this”<br />

“What if the managers won’t allow this to go ahead?”<br />

Day three<br />

<strong>The</strong> participants, by this time, were generally easily re engaging in the learning ethos<br />

<strong>of</strong> the programme days and there was evidence <strong>of</strong> trust and team effectiveness<br />

emerging from the programme day evaluations. <strong>The</strong> groups “Terms <strong>of</strong><br />

Engagements” were starting to be effective as a means <strong>of</strong> creating and sustaining<br />

“group norms” and were being used to set an agreed level <strong>of</strong> behaviours which<br />

guided participants on how to interact with one another. Some quotes from the<br />

participants about the “Terms <strong>of</strong> Engagements” included the following:<br />

“Participants feel more confident having these”<br />

“Permission to say things – I did not have this before”<br />

“More together as a team”<br />

“Opened up minds to new ideas to find ways to change” “Important<br />

to apply this to the whole team - outside and in the room”<br />

108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!