28.06.2014 Views

The Implementation of a Model of Person-Centred Practice In Older ...

The Implementation of a Model of Person-Centred Practice In Older ...

The Implementation of a Model of Person-Centred Practice In Older ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> a model <strong>of</strong> person-centred practice in older person settings<br />

When the programme commenced, each <strong>of</strong> the three sites were at varying stages <strong>of</strong><br />

change and development and all had individual reasons why they wanted to start<br />

implementing person-centred practice although what this meant and how it would<br />

look wasn’t fully understood. Anticipating a more empowered workforce was an ideal<br />

that was welcomed but difficult to vision or really comprehend. It was in the last year<br />

<strong>of</strong> the programme that this became a reality to varying degrees. One site said that:<br />

“we thought that we were person-centred and that the external facilitators didn’t really<br />

understand the way we work here”. “We had no idea how complex the programme<br />

would be or we might have backed out”. “I wondered what this course would do for<br />

me”.<br />

Having a sense <strong>of</strong> what the programme was about was unclear in the beginning,<br />

maybe because the three sites thought that they were already person-centred and<br />

that this was just a theoretical programme:<br />

“we are very person-centred here”, “we have always been person-centred”.<br />

<strong>The</strong> reality <strong>of</strong> the contrast between espoused values about care and what was<br />

actually happening became too obvious to ignore or defend and group members<br />

started to question their practice in a more critical way:<br />

“we thought we were person-centred but we realise that we were not”.<br />

Pressure mounted within the groups where some staff continued to maintain that the<br />

care was good and did not require any major change. This caused various issues<br />

within the PD groups where some members continued to maintain that care was<br />

person-centred while the majority <strong>of</strong> the group acknowledged that care practices<br />

needed to change and openly challenged each other.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the key tools now much more appreciated and that can makes a significant<br />

contribution to unpicking the issues for team working and effective care is the<br />

<strong>Person</strong>-centred <strong>Practice</strong> Framework (McCormack and McCance, 2009). <strong>The</strong><br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong> this framework grew slowly over the duration <strong>of</strong><br />

the programme with a belief that this is the starting point <strong>of</strong> person-centred team and<br />

care development. It is complex in the appreciation <strong>of</strong> each prerequisite within the<br />

framework and took time to fully appreciate the importance <strong>of</strong> each prerequisite and<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!