28.06.2014 Views

The Implementation of a Model of Person-Centred Practice In Older ...

The Implementation of a Model of Person-Centred Practice In Older ...

The Implementation of a Model of Person-Centred Practice In Older ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> a model <strong>of</strong> person-centred practice in older person settings<br />

based design (especially for people with cognitive impairments), construction <strong>of</strong> a<br />

ro<strong>of</strong> top garden and redesign <strong>of</strong> garden spaces, organising family events and the<br />

setting up <strong>of</strong> resident committees. <strong>The</strong> area reports <strong>of</strong>fer a good insight into the<br />

range and depth <strong>of</strong> changes that have taken place.<br />

CONTRIBUTION TO PRACTICE DEVELOPMENT KNOWLEDGE<br />

McCormack et al (2006) identified nine key issues that need to be addressed in order<br />

for practice development to have a desired impact and these themes will now be<br />

used to shape a discussion about the contribution <strong>of</strong> the programme to the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> knowledge about practice development.<br />

1. Decisions about practice development being uni or multidisciplinary should<br />

reflect the overarching intent/desired outcomes <strong>of</strong> the development work<br />

itself. Currently there is no evidence to suggest either one or the other<br />

approach works better.<br />

From the outset, there was an explicit multidisciplinary focus to this programme <strong>of</strong><br />

work. <strong>The</strong> ‘programme group’ in each participating site was comprised <strong>of</strong> a<br />

representative group <strong>of</strong> staff from the roles within the hospital. It was particularly<br />

exciting to have had the involvement and important contributions <strong>of</strong> cooks, cleaners,<br />

administration, gardeners etc as the contribution they made were <strong>of</strong>ten seen as<br />

‘crisis moments’ in the programme because they <strong>of</strong>fered alternative views to those <strong>of</strong><br />

dominant perspectives, i.e. registered nurses:<br />

“[Name] identified on the first Programme Day the lack <strong>of</strong> Catering Dept involvement<br />

in patient care other than provision <strong>of</strong> food, and the fact that many in the catering<br />

department could not identify a resident by their face- this brought about the ‘Face to<br />

the Plate’ development where a photo <strong>of</strong> each resident was placed on their menu<br />

sheet - I spoke to ward staff about this and told them that the catering staff would be<br />

seen around the wards carrying out observations <strong>of</strong> practice, I asked them to<br />

introduce the catering staff to residents and tell them a little about each person. I<br />

further developed this new relationship by talking with the catering manager and the<br />

DON to suggest other ways to involve catering in patient care. Now we have them<br />

going on fortnightly outings with residents, sitting down with a cup <strong>of</strong> tea in the dining<br />

room at breakfast time to talk with residents. One <strong>of</strong> them went on a trip to Lourdes<br />

this year with 4 residents, they will be involved in selecting daily menu choices with<br />

172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!