28.06.2014 Views

The Implementation of a Model of Person-Centred Practice In Older ...

The Implementation of a Model of Person-Centred Practice In Older ...

The Implementation of a Model of Person-Centred Practice In Older ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> a model <strong>of</strong> person-centred practice in older person settings<br />

This day saw the participants discussing quality <strong>of</strong> life and comparing their insights<br />

with the evidence they had previously collected in the workplace learning activity<br />

Cats Skirts and Lipstick with residents. This activity grounded in practice provided all<br />

<strong>of</strong> the participants with the opportunity to relate the lived experiences <strong>of</strong> residents<br />

and participants own knowledge some evidence from research and policy relating to<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> life indicators e.g. “Improving Quality <strong>of</strong> Life for <strong>Older</strong> People in Long–Stay<br />

Care Settings in Ireland (National Council on Ageing and <strong>Older</strong> People (2006), HIQA<br />

Standards (2007), and NCHRDF (UK) Review (2006). <strong>The</strong> PCN framework was<br />

again useful here in order to establish the complexities <strong>of</strong> cultural transformations<br />

and what would need to be addressed in order to make the quality <strong>of</strong> life indicators<br />

they identified for their residents/patients a reality. This activity revealed that<br />

knowing the older person is vital – however it was found to be tokenistic in day-to-day<br />

relationships.<br />

<strong>The</strong> participants were introduced to the concept <strong>of</strong> knowing self as well and in<br />

particular High Challenge and High Support. Participants identified with the<br />

traditional methods when challenge was needed: either pussyfooting, being so nice<br />

that the issue is avoid or clobbering being so punitive that the response is aggressive<br />

and wounding (Heron 1999 cited in Brockbank and McGill 2006). A third option <strong>of</strong><br />

skilled, supportive and enabling confrontation with the challenge being to get it right<br />

was the theme for day. <strong>In</strong> practice development challenge is recognised as essential<br />

for helping teams to move forward and become effective. <strong>In</strong> challenging custom and<br />

practice and the taken for granted it can sometimes be perceived as threatening, and<br />

may also be threatening in reality (Brockbank and McGill 2006). <strong>The</strong> participants<br />

were encouraged to start looking at how they were using HC/HS in their own areas<br />

and to practice the skill in order to become more confident in questioning practice<br />

issues.<br />

“Challenge and support – I need to understand more about how to best implement it”<br />

“Difficulties <strong>of</strong> High Challenge and High Support - a big risk but it can bring about<br />

change. I can see that”<br />

109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!