28.06.2014 Views

The Implementation of a Model of Person-Centred Practice In Older ...

The Implementation of a Model of Person-Centred Practice In Older ...

The Implementation of a Model of Person-Centred Practice In Older ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> a model <strong>of</strong> person-centred practice in older person settings<br />

(2) <strong>The</strong> dual experience <strong>of</strong> positivity and challenge: “Going forward is a challenge;<br />

bringing person-centred care forward is hard work”. At the same time<br />

participants could see and feel “we have seen how much we have achieved<br />

and we are getting stronger, we’ve achieved what others thought we could not”.<br />

Participants were beginning to realise that transformations were focused on the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> numerous small changes that they had the power to lead and<br />

embed, e.g. trying to move away from task-orientated to resident choice; to be<br />

more observant; to ensure person-centred language is used.<br />

(3) Getting action plans in motion: this required another burst <strong>of</strong> energy to get<br />

interest and involvement from other staff, residents, and where possible<br />

relatives and friends in order to progress the implementation using CIP<br />

principles.<br />

(4) Critical reflection and reflective practice: in the programme to date, the groups<br />

were finding reflection to be central to understanding the way care affects the<br />

resident. A few groups were starting to find group reflection to be very effective<br />

as “a way <strong>of</strong> debriefing after an incident on the unit before going home”.<br />

However, apart from two sites, most groups and facilitators were still not<br />

systematically building in the reflection sessions that were included in the<br />

programme days thus there was minimal recording written reflections as part <strong>of</strong><br />

the programme days. Sharing critical reflection in writing or in a group using a<br />

structured method was probably the biggest and longest challenge that<br />

participants and facilitators experienced. Throughout the two years this<br />

continued to be an issue. See discussion chapter where this is given further<br />

consideration.<br />

Day eleven<br />

Sixty participants in total attended the specific programme day (day 11) from the 11<br />

sites. This figure is <strong>of</strong>fered as it gives some indication <strong>of</strong> the continued commitment<br />

<strong>of</strong> participants and facilitators to the programme. <strong>The</strong> breakdown <strong>of</strong> nurses and non<br />

nurses who attended was approximately 67% registered nurses (ADON, CNMs and<br />

Staff Nurses) and 33% non nurses (healthcare attendants, catering staff,<br />

housekeeping staff).<br />

Towards the end <strong>of</strong> the programme the local facilitators and participants were now<br />

devising the detail <strong>of</strong> the programme days themselves and sending them to the<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!