A Case Study in NASA-DoD - The Black Vault
A Case Study in NASA-DoD - The Black Vault
A Case Study in NASA-DoD - The Black Vault
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
-86-<br />
i<br />
the results of the <strong>in</strong>itial study. <strong>The</strong> difficulty centered around the<br />
Air Force requirement to make procurement decisions dur<strong>in</strong>g the summer<br />
of 1976 for the spacecraft that would be used on the <strong>in</strong>itial Air Force<br />
shuttle flight. <strong>The</strong> L-AEM spacecraft design had not been def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
technically; this would take two months of study by Boe<strong>in</strong>g and would<br />
thereby postpone the Air Force decision po<strong>in</strong>t.<br />
One <strong>in</strong>terest of the AEM Program Office <strong>in</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g the L-AEM design<br />
considered <strong>in</strong> the Rand case study was based on the hope of provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />
some justification for <strong>in</strong>itiat<strong>in</strong>g the SMMS program, albeit for Air<br />
Force missions. At the time of this study, the AEM Program Office had<br />
not established a <strong>NASA</strong> requirement for the SMHS.<br />
As <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> Sec. IV, the results of the first phase of the<br />
case study illustrated that a spacecraft hav<strong>in</strong>g some of the characteristics<br />
of the L-AEM (the upgraded AEM) would be part of the preferred procurement<br />
option for the Space Test Program missions (see Table 12).<br />
Consequently, it was our feel<strong>in</strong>g that consideration of the L-AEM spacecraft<br />
should be encouraged because it offered substantial cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
for the Air Force, even if it meant postpon<strong>in</strong>g the midsummer Air Force<br />
procurement decision.<br />
Air Force Space Test Program Office<br />
<strong>The</strong> Air Force Space Test Program Office had for several years contracted<br />
for <strong>in</strong>dividual spacecraft designed to handle a specific set<br />
of experiments. This <strong>in</strong>volved contract<strong>in</strong>g for the launch vehicle,<br />
spacecraft development, and payload <strong>in</strong>tegration. As discussed <strong>in</strong><br />
Sec. III, its <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> the standard spacecraft approach for carry<strong>in</strong>g<br />
out its missions centered around the availability of the space<br />
shuttle and the possibility of realiz<strong>in</strong>g substantial budget sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
by apply<strong>in</strong>g its low-cost design philosophy to a standard spacecraft<br />
design. <strong>The</strong> Space Test Program Office had been selected for one of the<br />
first Air Force missions to fly on the shuttle, hence its critical<br />
schedule problem if it were to use a standard spacecraft design.<br />
<strong>NASA</strong> funded Boe<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g the spr<strong>in</strong>g of 1976 to make a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
design for the L-AEH spacecraft and to estimate its cost us<strong>in</strong>g the same<br />
approach as used for the AEM spacecraft.