01.07.2014 Views

A Case Study in NASA-DoD - The Black Vault

A Case Study in NASA-DoD - The Black Vault

A Case Study in NASA-DoD - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

-45-<br />

<strong>The</strong> STPSS can carry a nom<strong>in</strong>al payload of about 1000 lb, can be<br />

operated at altitudes up to geosynchronous, and weighs about 1000 lb.<br />

It can be procured <strong>in</strong> three different configurations--a sp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g version<br />

(STPSS-S), a low-cost, three-axis-stabilized version (STPSS-LC), and a<br />

three-axis-stabilized precision version (STPSS-P).<br />

<strong>The</strong> MMS is the most sophisticated of the standard spacecraft considered<br />

<strong>in</strong> this study; it is designed for on-orbit servic<strong>in</strong>g and reuse.<br />

It can carry a payload of about 4000 lb and can also be operated up to<br />

geosynchronous altitude.<br />

AEM and MMS spacecraft have communications systems that are compatible<br />

with the Space Track<strong>in</strong>g and Data Acquisition Network, while the L-AEM<br />

and STPSS are compatible with the Space Ground L<strong>in</strong>k System. This difference<br />

<strong>in</strong> the communication system needs to be corrected before the AEM<br />

and MMS can be used for Air Force missions. (<strong>The</strong> modifications necessary<br />

to make this correction are discussed later.) Another difference is <strong>in</strong><br />

the data rate capability of the communication systems. Both the AEM and<br />

MIS have data rates considerably less than that of the L-AEM and STPSS,<br />

i.e., 8 and 64 kbps,* respectively, as compared with 128 to 256 kbps.<br />

All of the spacecraft use 28 V electric power systems. <strong>The</strong> basic<br />

differences are <strong>in</strong> the solar array designs and battery charg<strong>in</strong>g systems.<br />

<strong>The</strong> AEM has a fixed solar array capable of provid<strong>in</strong>g about 40 to 50 W for<br />

experimental use. <strong>The</strong> other designs treat the solar array as a missionspecific<br />

item. <strong>The</strong> peak array power for the L-AEM is 1000 W, almost as<br />

much as the 1200 W of the STPSS output; the MMS power system can handle<br />

arrays hav<strong>in</strong>g a peak output of up to 3600 W. <strong>The</strong> battery-charg<strong>in</strong>g system<br />

of the MKS is different from those of the L-AEM and STPSS. All three provide<br />

for more than one battery, but an <strong>in</strong>dividual charg<strong>in</strong>g system is used<br />

by the L-AEM and STPSS, whereas a parallel charg<strong>in</strong>g system is used for the<br />

14S.<br />

In stabilization and control capability, the MMS is aga<strong>in</strong> superior to<br />

the other spacecraft with a po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g accuracy of ± 0.01 deg and a po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g<br />

stability of ± 10 -6 deg/sec. <strong>The</strong> L-AEM design provides essentially the<br />

<strong>The</strong> communications data rate is given <strong>in</strong> kbps, the power system<br />

capacity <strong>in</strong> volts (V), and the solar array output <strong>in</strong> watts (W).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!