A Case Study in NASA-DoD - The Black Vault
A Case Study in NASA-DoD - The Black Vault
A Case Study in NASA-DoD - The Black Vault
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
-61-<br />
Nonrecurr<strong>in</strong>g Costs. Nonrecurr<strong>in</strong>g costs were estimated for the<br />
STPSS and L-AEM only; for the other spacecraft those costs would not be<br />
borne by USAF and would be irrelevant <strong>in</strong> comparisons of USAF outlays.<br />
<strong>The</strong> SAMSO Unmanned Spacecraft Cost Abdel provided the basic estimat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
equations, which were derived from a sample of up to 28<br />
space programs<br />
over the period 1959-1972.<br />
Some spacecraft had been deleted from the<br />
sample because they were developed "under tight monetary constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
and under a philosophy that required the use of proven technology."<br />
STPSS is precisely such a program, so the output of the SAMSO model<br />
was modified to fit the Space Test Program Office philosophy.<br />
An <strong>in</strong>itial assumption was that the first spacecraft manufactured<br />
and tested would be a flight model, i.e., there would be no qualification<br />
test model. It was later decided that a qualification test model<br />
would be desirable, and the estimates weremodified to reflect that<br />
decision. <strong>The</strong> higher estimate is the one <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al program<br />
costs.<br />
For the L-AEM nonrecurr<strong>in</strong>g costs the basic estimate provided by<br />
Boe<strong>in</strong>g was scaled up to <strong>in</strong>clude a test model, but as shown <strong>in</strong> Table 8,<br />
the difference between L-AEM and STPSS nonrecurr<strong>in</strong>g costs is strik<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
When L-AEM costs are estimated <strong>in</strong> the same manner as those for the<br />
STPSS, the differences are far less.<br />
It is possible to construct a<br />
rationale for some degree of difference, e.g., L-AEM would be a followon<br />
to AEM, and there would be some transfer of learn<strong>in</strong>g. Also, STPSS<br />
consists of modules that are developed separately, then <strong>in</strong>tegrated,<br />
and each module is essentially a separate spacecraft. Configuration<br />
changes <strong>in</strong> L-AEM are handled on the basis of different kits rather<br />
than different modules. Nevertheless, the discrepancy between the<br />
estimates based on the SAMSO model and those based on Boe<strong>in</strong>g figures<br />
is too great to be ignored. In the discussion of program costs <strong>in</strong><br />
Sec. IV the impact of that discrepancy on the issue of spacecraft selection<br />
will be exam<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
Sample size varied for each spacecraft subsystem.