01.07.2014 Views

A Case Study in NASA-DoD - The Black Vault

A Case Study in NASA-DoD - The Black Vault

A Case Study in NASA-DoD - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-61-<br />

Nonrecurr<strong>in</strong>g Costs. Nonrecurr<strong>in</strong>g costs were estimated for the<br />

STPSS and L-AEM only; for the other spacecraft those costs would not be<br />

borne by USAF and would be irrelevant <strong>in</strong> comparisons of USAF outlays.<br />

<strong>The</strong> SAMSO Unmanned Spacecraft Cost Abdel provided the basic estimat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

equations, which were derived from a sample of up to 28<br />

space programs<br />

over the period 1959-1972.<br />

Some spacecraft had been deleted from the<br />

sample because they were developed "under tight monetary constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

and under a philosophy that required the use of proven technology."<br />

STPSS is precisely such a program, so the output of the SAMSO model<br />

was modified to fit the Space Test Program Office philosophy.<br />

An <strong>in</strong>itial assumption was that the first spacecraft manufactured<br />

and tested would be a flight model, i.e., there would be no qualification<br />

test model. It was later decided that a qualification test model<br />

would be desirable, and the estimates weremodified to reflect that<br />

decision. <strong>The</strong> higher estimate is the one <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al program<br />

costs.<br />

For the L-AEM nonrecurr<strong>in</strong>g costs the basic estimate provided by<br />

Boe<strong>in</strong>g was scaled up to <strong>in</strong>clude a test model, but as shown <strong>in</strong> Table 8,<br />

the difference between L-AEM and STPSS nonrecurr<strong>in</strong>g costs is strik<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

When L-AEM costs are estimated <strong>in</strong> the same manner as those for the<br />

STPSS, the differences are far less.<br />

It is possible to construct a<br />

rationale for some degree of difference, e.g., L-AEM would be a followon<br />

to AEM, and there would be some transfer of learn<strong>in</strong>g. Also, STPSS<br />

consists of modules that are developed separately, then <strong>in</strong>tegrated,<br />

and each module is essentially a separate spacecraft. Configuration<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> L-AEM are handled on the basis of different kits rather<br />

than different modules. Nevertheless, the discrepancy between the<br />

estimates based on the SAMSO model and those based on Boe<strong>in</strong>g figures<br />

is too great to be ignored. In the discussion of program costs <strong>in</strong><br />

Sec. IV the impact of that discrepancy on the issue of spacecraft selection<br />

will be exam<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

Sample size varied for each spacecraft subsystem.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!