01.07.2014 Views

A Case Study in NASA-DoD - The Black Vault

A Case Study in NASA-DoD - The Black Vault

A Case Study in NASA-DoD - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-148-<br />

(36 <strong>in</strong>. <strong>in</strong> diameter by 55.5 <strong>in</strong>. <strong>in</strong> length) is an exist<strong>in</strong>g flightqualified<br />

design that was developed for the Vik<strong>in</strong>g Orbiter (VO-75)<br />

program. It presently has a surface tension device for propellant<br />

expulsion, which will most likely be replaced with an elastomeric<br />

(AF-E-332) bladder. Such replacement would entail about a 25 percent<br />

modification to the overall tank assembly. As <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> Table E-l,<br />

the structure weight is <strong>in</strong>creased from 29 lb to 81 lb compared to<br />

SPS-I. However, it should be noted that these weights <strong>in</strong>clude propulsion<br />

module structure, drive electronics, remote <strong>in</strong>terface unit, GN 2 ,<br />

and other miscellaneous items; hence, some care <strong>in</strong> cost bookkeep<strong>in</strong>g<br />

appears warranted for both the SPS-I and SPS-II systems. <strong>The</strong> total<br />

SPS-I system costs are estimated to be $500K nonrecurr<strong>in</strong>g and $750K<br />

recurr<strong>in</strong>g on the basis that the SPS-I system will be built first.<br />

In compar<strong>in</strong>g these two MMS hydraz<strong>in</strong>e systems with the STPSS cold<br />

gas systems, the same comments apply as presented earlier <strong>in</strong> the comparison<br />

of STPSS cold gas systems and the AEM hydraz<strong>in</strong>e system, i.e.,<br />

a different cost base is required for cold gas hydraz<strong>in</strong>e components.<br />

With respect to the STPSS hydraz<strong>in</strong>e system, the same cost base should<br />

apply with perhaps some m<strong>in</strong>or adjustments for the required component<br />

modifications noted here<strong>in</strong>. Moreover, the 0.2 lb and 5 lb thrusters<br />

F<br />

F<br />

of the MMS systems are estimated at $12K each compared to $20K and $25K<br />

each for the 0.1 lb and 4 lb F thrusters <strong>in</strong> the STPSS hydraz<strong>in</strong>e system.<br />

This difference is probably reconcilable on the basis that the MMS<br />

thrusters have s<strong>in</strong>gle-seat/s<strong>in</strong>gle-coil propellant flow control valves<br />

versus dual-seal/dual-coil valves <strong>in</strong> the STPSS thrusters and perhaps<br />

less contractor test<strong>in</strong>g and paperwork required, s<strong>in</strong>ce the MKS thrusters<br />

are standard <strong>NASA</strong> items.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!