01.07.2014 Views

A Case Study in NASA-DoD - The Black Vault

A Case Study in NASA-DoD - The Black Vault

A Case Study in NASA-DoD - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-69-<br />

to <strong>in</strong>crease to 13. That was found to be true across a wide number of<br />

excursions.<br />

It should be noted here that assum<strong>in</strong>g a maximum number of payloads<br />

per spacecraft of 13 results <strong>in</strong> an average number of payloads per spacecraft<br />

of only 5 to 8, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the procurement option. <strong>The</strong> largest<br />

benefit is from orbits 1 and 2 where the majority of Space Test Program<br />

payloads are scheduled to be flown. To illustrate that, Fig. 8 presents<br />

a detailed breakdown of the distribution of the actual maximum number of<br />

payloads per spacecraft by orbit for the all-STPSS procurement option.<br />

For orbit l-S, for example, if the assumed maximum number of payloads<br />

per spacecraft is allowed to <strong>in</strong>crease from 6 to 13, the actual maximum<br />

number of payloads assigned to a spacecraft <strong>in</strong>creases from 5 to 10.<br />

<strong>The</strong> difference between the actual number of payloads assigned to a<br />

spacecraft and the upper limit occurs <strong>in</strong> all orbits because of the<br />

limited number of payloads <strong>in</strong> each orbit.<br />

In orbit 1-S, for example,<br />

the mission model <strong>in</strong>cludes only 20 payloads, which were distributed<br />

evenly between two spacecraft when the assumed maximum number of payloads<br />

per spacecraft was <strong>in</strong>creased to 10.<br />

Consequently, the average<br />

number of payloads per spacecraft for a given procurement option does<br />

not <strong>in</strong>crease substantially as a result of allow<strong>in</strong>g the assumed maximum<br />

number of payloads per spacecraft to <strong>in</strong>crease from 6 to 13.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> difficulty associated with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the number of payloads<br />

per spacecraft lies <strong>in</strong> the payload-<strong>in</strong>tegration area. Although<br />

the specific performance limits of each spacecraft were imposed while<br />

allocat<strong>in</strong>g payloads, payload-<strong>in</strong>tegration problems and costs were not<br />

explicitly exam<strong>in</strong>ed. Based on the sav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> program costs identified<br />

as a result of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the maximum number of payloads per spacecraft,<br />

it appears that a systematic study of the payload <strong>in</strong>tegration problems<br />

and costs would be useful.<br />

Figure 9 illustrates the variation <strong>in</strong> program cost as a function<br />

of Space Test Program size.<br />

Here program size was doubled to a total<br />

of 228 payloads to see if economies of scale might preferentially benefit<br />

the MKS and thereby alter the order<strong>in</strong>g of the procurement options.<br />

*<br />

While 13 payloads are never allocated to a spacecraft <strong>in</strong> the<br />

example shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 8, this is not the case for other procurement<br />

options, especially those <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the MMS.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!