A Case Study in NASA-DoD - The Black Vault

More documents

Recommendations

Info

I 4 I IQ. w ~ w 01 " 1 I I I I 0 .cc I 1 0 1I I I ' I I I ' I I I *, XJ 4010 0 I I 4 0 .4~ '.4 I * 0 C, I .0. I I I . A0 I I I 1.4 ~ ~ ~ 'J 0 r en4-I w I I . .01 I: I I y c 0 10 1 0 1 In I 0 U 0 1 - I0 e >' ' 41 'w I I 0 * n 1 1.4 %n I I I01 I 00 0 10 0% 0n <strong>in</strong> M 4oo 0 ~ o~1 u £ ... . 4 -4 0 V0 a I 0 C4 0 I I . I 0 I I I4 000I -4 M I1 1 0 1 fn 1I001 In cn 1 0 1 - .a I I ~ V 5- . . 444I I I I II 0 0 C -4 W% I In 1 - I -4 enI _______0_____008 -?4 - U'00 .0 W) Ln I 0 1 Lo cJ IR 0I I1 0 0 Iit I 0 n' o4 "1 0 1' I (4 -" 1 0 I 0 0 4 1 " I 0 I . 0 0 '00 -1 1 ' O -4 .- I uII- 4)J *r r- W.. 1) 0I 04 e n ' 00 en n r. 1 In 1a. 0. 1 <strong>in</strong> 1 4 V4 I In 0)
-162- U Table H-2 ORBIT 1-S: PAYLOAD~ ASSIGNMENTS Orbit 1-S: Sun synchronous, 250-300 n mi circular, sun-oriented Payload number 15 19 20 27 33 37 48 51 Weight (lb) 50 10 76 250 1 12 135 3 Candidate Spacecraft AEM a Y y y STPSS-S STPSS-LC x x x x x STPSS-P or MIS x x x x x x x x ay applies when AEM maximum altitude is geosynchronous (19,382 r. mi). Table H-3 ORBIT 1-E: PAYLOAD ASSIGNMENTS Orbit 1-E: Sun-synchronous, 250-300 n mi circular, earth-oriented Payload number 18 23 26 128 29 134 35 36 138 39 40 41 49 Weight (lb) 13 9 13 1525 53 113 40 60 6 5 331 1135 25 Candidate Spacecraft AEN xy XY xy xy xy KY xy x XY N KY STPSS-S x x x X x STPSS-LC x x 1 X x x x x x x x X x STPSS-P or MMS x x x xx x x x x x x xx
Page 2 and 3:
LEYEL r o R-2619-RC May 1980 Standa
Page 4 and 5:
SECUNITY CLASSIFICATION OF Twa PAGE
Page 6 and 7:
Standard 5pacecraft.ProcurementL_ A
Page 8 and 9:
-ivas representing the official vie
Page 10 and 11:
the missions required. Third, the p
Page 12 and 13:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gratefully acknow
Page 14 and 15:
-xii- VI. APPLYING THE NASA-DOD COO
Page 16 and 17:
-. - am~rumn -xv- TABLES 1. Nominal
Page 18 and 19:
-Xvii- 11-19. Case IV(N)...........
Page 20 and 21:
-xx- L-ANX - Large Diameter Applica
Page 22 and 23:
-1- I. INTRODUCTION The National Ae
Page 24 and 25:
-3- development. Finally, the polic
Page 26 and 27:
-5- of which spacecraft would enabl
Page 28 and 29:
-7- II. U.S. SPACE PROGRAM: DEVELOP
Page 30 and 31:
-9- thought. (8 ) The launching of
Page 32 and 33:
-1- had shown great alarm or acknow
Page 34 and 35:
-13- for other purposes. ,(15) it w
Page 36 and 37:
-15- and that determination as to w
Page 38 and 39:
-17- program and the coordination o
Page 40 and 41:
t -19- legislation, messages, petit
Page 42 and 43:
-21- of the continuing Soviet accom
Page 44 and 45:
-23- Subsequently, the Director of
Page 46 and 47:
-25- to be asked by one of the agen
Page 48 and 49:
-27- space systems; operational sys
Page 50 and 51:
-29- no near-earth orbit manned ope
Page 52 and 53:
ImP, ~ ~ ~~~~ ......... ~~~~~~~~~~~
Page 54 and 55:
-33- 5. Using off-the-shelf, space-
Page 56 and 57:
-35- 1. Spacecraft configurations a
Page 58 and 59:
-37- STANDARD SPACECRAFT DESCRIPTIO
Page 60 and 61:
-39- The payload cluster, while uni
Page 62 and 63:
-41- payload or propulsion, is abou
Page 64 and 65:
-43- z z 0 0 - 0r CL 0 E 4 41- u- 0
Page 66 and 67:
-45- The STPSS can carry a nominal
Page 68 and 69:
i -47- orbit-adjust module, while t
Page 70 and 71:
-49- M9IS The basic MMS, summarized
Page 72 and 73:
-51- 1980-1990 time period are divi
Page 74 and 75:
-53- about 7.5 payloads per spacecr
Page 76 and 77:
-55- 0- - - - - - - - - - cc - - -
Page 78 and 79:
-57- STPSS (STPSS-LC) spacecraft ca
Page 80 and 81:
-59- Table 7 ESTIMATED UNIT 1 COST
Page 82 and 83:
-61- Nonrecurring Costs. Nonrecurri
Page 84 and 85:
-63- where SRU = Service Rendered U
Page 86 and 87:
-65- IV. STANDARD SPACECRAFT ACQUIS
Page 88 and 89:
-67- The costs associated with thes
Page 90 and 91:
-69- to increase to 13. That was fo
Page 92 and 93:
-71- 500 * STPSS 400 AW-STPSS PROGR
Page 94 and 95:
-73- The implications of the forego
Page 96 and 97:
-75- option. Other candidates becom
Page 98 and 99:
-77- the Air Force's Space Test Pro
Page 100 and 101:
-79- decrease any total program cos
Page 102 and 103:
-81- COST LAUNCH COSTS (Millions of
Page 104 and 105:
-83- V. NASA-DOD COOPERATION: ORGAN
Page 106 and 107:
-85- the MHS program stemmed from t
Page 108 and 109:
-87- The Air Force had studied the
Page 110 and 111:
-89- Air Force Headquarters to NASA
Page 112 and 113:
-91- turns out, NASA had agreed to
Page 114 and 115:
also evaluate whether or not adequa
Page 116 and 117:
-95- design, mission model, cost es
Page 118 and 119:
-97- Force interface was retained,
Page 120 and 121:
-99- experience and by identifying
Page 122 and 123:
. . . . . . . -.. . . . . . . . . .
Page 124 and 125:
-103- the nation and other governme
Page 126 and 127:
-105- Appendix A ESTIMATES OF COST
Page 128 and 129:
-107- RANGE OF BIDS Item Range ($ t
Page 130 and 131:
-109- Table A-1 SPACECRAFT COSTS--N
Page 132 and 133: 'I FI Table A-2 SPACECRAFT COSTS WI
Page 134 and 135: -113- Table A-3 LAUNCH COSTS--NOMIN
Page 136 and 137: -115- Table A-5 LAUNCH COSTS FOR TH
Page 138 and 139: Table B-I POWER SYSTEM COMPARISONS
Page 140 and 141: -119- NOTES TO TABLE B-I (Cont.) mo
Page 142 and 143: -121- The duration of the data pass
Page 144 and 145: -123- INNNU AWA n -. s vo (I T 'API
Page 146 and 147: -125- each battery has its own char
Page 148 and 149: -127- Table B-2 POWER SUMMARY Chara
Page 150 and 151: -129- Appendix C COMMUNICATIONS AND
Page 152 and 153: -131- chiefly for storing commands
Page 154 and 155: -133- Table C-2 C&DH CHANGES REQUIR
Page 156 and 157: -135- Table C-3 C&DH CHANGES REQUIR
Page 158 and 159: -137- NOTES TO TABLE C-3 (Cont.) we
Page 160 and 161: - 139- Table D-1 ATTITUDE CONTROL A
Page 162 and 163: * -141- and three reaction wheels a
Page 164 and 165: -143- by the commonly adopted desig
Page 166 and 167: -145- Table E-l--Continued I Unit T
Page 168 and 169: -147- flight-proven elastomeric dia
Page 170 and 171: -149- Appendix F STRUCTURAL SUBSYST
Page 172 and 173: -151- points are provided by three
Page 174 and 175: -153- Table F-2 STPSS STRUCTURAL CO
Page 176 and 177: -155- Appendix G THERMAL CONTROL SU
Page 178 and 179: -157- sunlight. These surfaces incl
Page 180 and 181: -159- Appendix H PROGRAM OPTIONS FO
Page 184 and 185: -163- Table H-4 ORBIT 2: PAYLOAD AS
Page 186 and 187: -165- c0 k- c" Q N 3- W 0 0 IT -- c
Page 188 and 189: -167- Table 1-7 CASE I (A)a PROGRAM
Page 190 and 191: -169- Table H-9 CASES I (K) AND V (
Page 192 and 193: -171- Table H-11 CASE II(B) PROGRAM
Page 194 and 195: -173- Table H-13 CASE 111(C) PROGRA
Page 196 and 197: -175- Table H-15 CASE 111(M) PROGRA
Page 198 and 199: -177- Table H-17 CASE IV(D) PROGRAM
Page 200 and 201: -17 9- Table H-19 CASE IV(N) PROGRA
Page 202 and 203: -181- Table Hi-21 CASE V (E) PROGRA
Page 204 and 205: -183- Table H-23 CASE VI(F) PROGRAM
Page 206 and 207: -185- Appendix J AIR FORCE AND NASA
Page 208 and 209: MEMORANDUM OF AGRE1MENT ON THE PROC
Page 210 and 211: -189- 2.2 DOD SPACE TEST PROGRAM: T
Page 212 and 213: -191- l4.1.7 STP will review the HF
Page 214 and 215: I -193- 5.0 NASA AND DOD FINANCIAL
Page 216 and 217: -195- 5.4.3 Post Delivery Phase: NA
Page 218 and 219: I '-197- $4 .0 0 A 0 f-4 ;C:ur 0 V
Page 220 and 221: t 4 In I Io H 0p Ad ~t m 00 -199- E
Page 222 and 223: -201- COPIED August 24, 1976 Honora
Page 224 and 225: -204- 13. "The National Space Progr
Page 226 and 227: -206- 39. Tec hnical vpoaal for a M
show all

A Case Study in NASA-DoD - The Black Vault

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?