29.08.2014 Views

Warriors in Peace Operations - Strategic Studies Institute - U.S. Army

Warriors in Peace Operations - Strategic Studies Institute - U.S. Army

Warriors in Peace Operations - Strategic Studies Institute - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

support. After several false starts, the 3d Infantry Division<br />

(soon to become the 1st Infantry Division) was designated to<br />

support us. They did a magnificent job. Their DISCOM<br />

commander and shop officer were wonderful, treat<strong>in</strong>g us as<br />

their own, and often with more responsiveness and effort<br />

than we were used to from our own DISCOM.<br />

One issue arose immediately when I returned. 2-3 FA<br />

had numerous Heavy Expanded-Mobility Tactical Trucks<br />

(HEMETTs) which had not been turned <strong>in</strong> after they had<br />

been replaced with newer vehicles. They were <strong>in</strong> various<br />

states of read<strong>in</strong>ess, and it was immediately obvious that my<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance personnel could not get them prepared for<br />

turn <strong>in</strong>. Additionally, my ma<strong>in</strong>tenance personnel could not<br />

even ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the vehicles I had under my control. I had<br />

lost 14 tanks and all of the mechanics that would normally<br />

work on them when A Company deployed. However, I<br />

ga<strong>in</strong>ed 45 tanks with the rear detachments that came to me.<br />

Additionally, <strong>in</strong> order to fill their shortages, the deploy<strong>in</strong>g<br />

units had stripped the mechanics and crews for those tanks.<br />

In fact, we had more tanks <strong>in</strong> the brigade rear detachment<br />

than the brigade which had deployed to Bosnia, but with a<br />

much smaller portion of ma<strong>in</strong>tenance assets. So<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of this equipment became a major issue.<br />

Despite a lot of resistance from TF VICTORY (the Corps<br />

rear detachment) and the ma<strong>in</strong>tenance community <strong>in</strong><br />

general, we managed to push through the idea of contract<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance. We hired some contract personnel who<br />

performed organizational and direct support ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />

on the non-battalion equipment left beh<strong>in</strong>d. It was really<br />

the only way that we could have kept the equipment<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed, and I believe the concept was very successful.<br />

In fact, the equipment was probably <strong>in</strong> better condition<br />

when the units returned than when they departed. They<br />

even managed to get the 2-3 FA HEMETTs to standard so<br />

they could be turned <strong>in</strong>, which was no small feat.<br />

Although ma<strong>in</strong>tenance was a significant issue when I<br />

returned from Bad Kreuznach, the biggest issues were<br />

110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!