Conducting a Participatory Situation Analysis of.pdf - Global HIV ...
Conducting a Participatory Situation Analysis of.pdf - Global HIV ...
Conducting a Participatory Situation Analysis of.pdf - Global HIV ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Appendix D: Ethical Considerations<br />
Ethical Considerations When Gathering<br />
Information from Children and Adolescents<br />
Excerpt from: “Ethical Guidelines for Gathering Information from Children and Adolescents,” forthcoming from www.popcouncil.org/horizons<br />
or contact horizons@pcdc.org.<br />
Flow Diagram<br />
The following flow diagram summarizes the main points to be considered when planning an activity to gather information from<br />
children and adolescents that meets ethical standards:<br />
Start<br />
Address<br />
the issue<br />
IS THE PROPOSED INFORMATION-GATHERING ACTIVITY NECESSARY AND JUSTIFIED?<br />
• Is the activity taking place within the broad context <strong>of</strong> a participatory approach?<br />
• Is the purpose <strong>of</strong> the activity clearly defi ned and are suffi cient funds available?<br />
• Is the required information unavailable elsewhere (e.g. in existing documents or from<br />
older informants)?<br />
• Will the young people involved in this activity benefi t from it?<br />
No<br />
Abandon<br />
Activity<br />
Yes<br />
Address<br />
the issue<br />
IS THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY DESIGNED TO GET VALID INFORMATION?<br />
• Is there a written description <strong>of</strong> how the data will be collected, analyzed, and used?<br />
• Have opportunities been identifi ed for children to express their views about the<br />
design and conduct <strong>of</strong> the activity?<br />
• Does the sampling methodology ensure that all children have an equal opportunity<br />
to participate, recognizing gender, ethnic, and other barriers?<br />
• Have instruments been developed in consultation with pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, locally translated,<br />
and fi eld tested?<br />
• Has the use <strong>of</strong> a comparison group for operations research been ethically justifi ed?<br />
No<br />
Abandon<br />
Activity<br />
Yes<br />
Address<br />
the issue<br />
HAVE COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER CONCERNS BEEN APPROPRIATELY CONSIDERED?<br />
• Have all the appropriate community and related groups with an interest in the results<br />
been consulted for permission to work with children?<br />
• Have efforts been made to ensure that community and potential participants understand<br />
the activity’s purpose and possible outcomes to avoid raising false expectations?<br />
• Are local supervision mechanisms in place to monitor child protection and review<br />
ongoing activities?<br />
No<br />
Abandon<br />
Activity<br />
Yes<br />
Turn to next page<br />
Address<br />
the issue<br />
HAVE ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY BEEN ANTICIPATED?<br />
• Have potentially harmful direct consequences <strong>of</strong> the activity been anticipated and<br />
safeguarded against?<br />
• Has the possibility <strong>of</strong> community stigma from participation been anticipated and<br />
safeguarded against?<br />
Have the identities <strong>of</strong> participants been protected?<br />
Have fi eld staff been appropriately selected, trained, and supported?<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Are fi eld staff and associated community resources prepared to anticipate, recognize,<br />
and respond to children’s needs for follow up, recognizing age, gender, ethnicity, etc?<br />
<strong>Conducting</strong> a <strong>Participatory</strong> <strong>Situation</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Orphans and Vulnerable Children Affected by <strong>HIV</strong>/AIDS<br />
111<br />
Abandon<br />
No<br />
Activity