02.09.2014 Views

Conducting a Participatory Situation Analysis of.pdf - Global HIV ...

Conducting a Participatory Situation Analysis of.pdf - Global HIV ...

Conducting a Participatory Situation Analysis of.pdf - Global HIV ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Example from the Field: Consent<br />

Process<br />

For an assessment <strong>of</strong> OVC in Zambia, the study<br />

interviewer read the consent statement and the<br />

psychosocial support person witnessed and signed<br />

it in writing. No names were taken to ensure complete<br />

anonymity <strong>of</strong> participants. Participants were<br />

not given any financial or material incentives to<br />

participate in the survey. Respondents were given<br />

resource lists <strong>of</strong> organizations that existed in their<br />

compounds or districts.<br />

direct conversation spontaneously from one to another,<br />

stopping to clarify comments or perhaps return to earlier<br />

questions as needed to ensure that participants go as far<br />

as they can with each topic. The topic guide also can<br />

suggest follow-up questions for various possible responses<br />

and examples <strong>of</strong> probes to elicit more in-depth information.<br />

Stories or other scenarios, included in the topic<br />

guide, can be presented to the group to stimulate ideas.<br />

When probing, an interviewer encourages a respondent<br />

to produce more information on a particular topic<br />

without injecting his or her own ideas into the discussion.<br />

The most common type <strong>of</strong> probing is to repeat<br />

back to the respondent what she or he has said and ask<br />

for more information or clarification. Another way to<br />

probe is to use a culturally appropriate non-verbal signal<br />

after being given some information, encouraging<br />

the respondent to continue expanding his or her idea.<br />

In some cultures, nodding or saying “uh-huh” are suitable<br />

non-verbal signals.<br />

Note-taking and tape-recording data<br />

How data are documented is directly linked to their<br />

trustworthiness; thus, great care must be taken when creating<br />

and managing data files. An interaction can be<br />

recorded via handwritten notes during or soon after it<br />

happens, but audiotape recordings provide a more complete<br />

account. Tape-recorded interviews (or their transcriptions)<br />

make it possible for them to be reviewed by<br />

others, who can then decide whether they would have<br />

drawn the same conclusions. The comfort level <strong>of</strong> participants<br />

must be considered when recording data, either by<br />

hand or by tape-recording. To be ethical and to promote<br />

participant involvement, the interviewer or moderator<br />

should obtain agreement from the participants regarding<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> a tape-recorder.<br />

While tape-recorders are useful they should not be the<br />

only data record for interviews and FGDs. The set <strong>of</strong><br />

notes that are generated by interviewers and assistant<br />

moderators are also valuable data, and complement the<br />

records <strong>of</strong> interviews or FGDs that are transcribed from<br />

audiotapes. The interviewer must take note <strong>of</strong> key phrases,<br />

major points made by the respondent, and key words<br />

(indicated by quotation marks) that capture the speaker’s<br />

own language. If, for some reason, a tape-recorder cannot<br />

be used or if it malfunctions, detailed notes become even<br />

more critical, especially notes <strong>of</strong> actual quotes. Capturing<br />

what people say in their own words, along with related<br />

non-verbal responses (especially when those responses<br />

contrast with the verbal responses), are an important<br />

Involving Young People in Data<br />

Collection<br />

When Save the Children/United Kingdom staff<br />

conducted research on street children in<br />

Bangladesh, they trained young people to conduct<br />

the interviews.The findings aimed to generate<br />

national debate among policymakers and stakeholders<br />

regarding the vulnerability experienced by<br />

these children. Lessons learned by engaging young<br />

data collectors included:<br />

• Young people brought fresh categories and<br />

perceptions to the research.<br />

• Data gathered were high quality and the findings<br />

compared well with those <strong>of</strong> similar<br />

research carried out by adults.<br />

• Young respondents enjoyed being interviewed<br />

by their peers.<br />

• Young researchers were clearly able to raise<br />

issues and ask questions in a way adults<br />

could not.<br />

• It was difficult to determine the right incentives<br />

for the young people to take part.<br />

• Discussion <strong>of</strong> sensitive issues (e.g., abuse<br />

experienced) was challenging.<br />

• Adult harassment <strong>of</strong> the children occurred<br />

while carrying out the research.<br />

Techniques such as <strong>Participatory</strong> Learning for<br />

collecting information from children are presented<br />

in the Save the Children document, Children and<br />

Participation: Research, Monitoring and Evaluation<br />

with Children and Young People, available at<br />

www.savethechildren.org<br />

<strong>Conducting</strong> a <strong>Participatory</strong> <strong>Situation</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Orphans and Vulnerable Children Affected by <strong>HIV</strong>/AIDS<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!