02.09.2014 Views

Conducting a Participatory Situation Analysis of.pdf - Global HIV ...

Conducting a Participatory Situation Analysis of.pdf - Global HIV ...

Conducting a Participatory Situation Analysis of.pdf - Global HIV ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Creating a Terminology List<br />

One key task <strong>of</strong> the Technical Lead is to prepare a<br />

list <strong>of</strong> terms and acronyms used in the report.<br />

This list is the primary lexicon <strong>of</strong> the analysis population<br />

and includes terms relevant to the<br />

<strong>HIV</strong>/AIDS-affected OVC issue. One cannot<br />

assume, for example, that the reader uses the<br />

same definition <strong>of</strong> orphan or vulnerable child.<br />

ommend potentially cost-effective interventions. They<br />

may also identify organizations that are best suited to<br />

respond to the recommendations. In situation analysis<br />

reports, a list <strong>of</strong> all key recommendations must stand<br />

out. As a general rule, the recommendations section<br />

should be no longer than 2 pages.<br />

Appending the Data<br />

The complete situation analysis report should have an<br />

appendix that contains the data tables and interview<br />

transcripts, but it must not contain any identifying information<br />

about respondents. Given the potentially large<br />

volume <strong>of</strong> information in such a data appendix, it may<br />

be necessary to put it on a CD-ROM. Including the<br />

data in a report appendix enables other readers to use the<br />

data for their own purposes and/or to look more closely<br />

at the data for specific information. For example, care<br />

and support pr<strong>of</strong>essionals can benefit from the actual<br />

data because it allows them to look for language commonly<br />

used by community members, guardians, and the<br />

children to refer to their situations, and then compare<br />

that with language used in their own programs.<br />

More Sources Are Better Than Fewer<br />

Seek other data sources that support the situation<br />

analysis findings.As part <strong>of</strong> preparing for a situation<br />

analysis, the <strong>Situation</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> Manager<br />

should seek out secondary data sources to help<br />

inform the Advisory Team on information gaps.<br />

During the report-writing phase, these secondary<br />

data should be searched again for points that support<br />

or expand the findings. Secondary data that<br />

may be referenced or woven into reports include:<br />

school dropout rates in areas with high <strong>HIV</strong>/AIDS<br />

incidence, number <strong>of</strong> street children and abandoned<br />

children, number <strong>of</strong> institutionalized children,<br />

mother-to-child <strong>HIV</strong> transmission data, and<br />

child labor statistics.<br />

Tips for Developing<br />

Recommendations<br />

It is important to mentally step back from the<br />

details <strong>of</strong> the data collected to look at the general<br />

situation and see what needs to be done. Look at<br />

the recommendations as a whole to identify related<br />

issues that could be addressed through a particular<br />

action; this can help identify broad<br />

priorities for action.When developing recommendations,<br />

pay particular attention to the following<br />

questions:<br />

• How is each recommendation supported by<br />

analysis findings?<br />

• What differences can an intervention be<br />

expected to make in the child’s life and in the<br />

household?<br />

• What actions are necessary pre-conditions<br />

for other actions?<br />

• In what ways are potential solutions to problems<br />

interrelated?<br />

• Can the recommendations be prioritized?<br />

• Is there a person, organization, or government<br />

ministry that can be made responsible for<br />

action on each recommendation?<br />

• Is the current level <strong>of</strong> information exchange<br />

about orphans and vulnerable children’s needs<br />

and services adequate?<br />

• How could collaborative action be increased?<br />

• What can be done to increase the likelihood<br />

that available resources will be used in keeping<br />

with the recommendations?<br />

• How can ongoing monitoring <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

AIDS on children and families be carried out?<br />

• Can a particular approach or intervention be<br />

implemented (considering both potential availability<br />

<strong>of</strong> resources over time and technical<br />

feasibility) on a scale sufficient to improve the<br />

situation <strong>of</strong> a substantial portion <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

vulnerable children and households?<br />

• Which approaches or interventions will produce<br />

long-term improvements for vulnerable<br />

children and households, either by being sustained<br />

over time or by producing ongoing<br />

socioeconomic benefits?<br />

Adapted from Williamson, J., Cox,A., and Johnston, B. 2004. <strong>Conducting</strong><br />

a <strong>Situation</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> Orphans and Vulnerable Children Affected by<br />

<strong>HIV</strong>/AIDS. February. PHNI.<br />

<strong>Conducting</strong> a <strong>Participatory</strong> <strong>Situation</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Orphans and Vulnerable Children Affected by <strong>HIV</strong>/AIDS<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!