20.10.2014 Views

building the american landscape - Univerza v Novi Gorici

building the american landscape - Univerza v Novi Gorici

building the american landscape - Univerza v Novi Gorici

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

With no bearing on ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> logic of <strong>the</strong> construction chessboard or <strong>the</strong> dynamics<br />

of <strong>the</strong> new agricultural lands, <strong>the</strong> new <strong>landscape</strong>s which were created led to <strong>the</strong><br />

subsequent, nineteenth century idealisation of nature. Christian Zapatka speaks of<br />

<strong>the</strong> numerous experiences which followed this particular structure to plan for<br />

suburban, residential neighbourhoods as intermediate areas between town and<br />

country:<br />

In <strong>the</strong> mid‐to‐late nineteenth century, projects for suburban<br />

neighbourhoods such as Roland Park in Baltimore and Druid Hills Park in<br />

Atlanta proposed curvilinear plans that not only took advantage of <strong>the</strong><br />

site conditions but introduced less rigid streets. The streets were much<br />

less integrated with <strong>the</strong> houses than in urban cases. Early photographs<br />

show individual foot bridges, for example, going from <strong>the</strong> crown of <strong>the</strong><br />

road to <strong>the</strong> sidewalk in front of each house. The suburban streets were<br />

more highway‐like than urban. These neighbourhoods could be seen as<br />

residential versions of <strong>the</strong> great city parks. The allure of a country house<br />

within <strong>the</strong> boundaries of <strong>the</strong> city was one of <strong>the</strong> forces behind <strong>the</strong><br />

project. 97<br />

Even more surprising is Wright’s indirect revision of <strong>the</strong> oval block scheme<br />

implemented in Riverside by Olmsted. Wright was to remain substantially faithful to<br />

<strong>the</strong> grid for decades, but at <strong>the</strong> same time he included some suggestions from <strong>the</strong><br />

world of <strong>landscape</strong> gardening. In fact, in some little known projects, Wright was to<br />

programmatically combine <strong>the</strong> picturesque approach with that of <strong>the</strong> grid module.<br />

Although Olmsted and Wright had no direct contact with each o<strong>the</strong>r, it has to be<br />

said that <strong>the</strong> latter knew <strong>the</strong> Riverside project very well, since it was not very far<br />

away from Oak Park. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, at <strong>the</strong> beginning of <strong>the</strong> twentieth century,<br />

Wright was to get <strong>the</strong> opportunity to plan as part of <strong>the</strong> Olmsted project, both<br />

Thomek House (1907) and various <strong>building</strong>s on <strong>the</strong> Coonley Estate (1907‐09), fine<br />

tuning <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me of <strong>the</strong> prairie houses. It was actually Coonley House, toge<strong>the</strong>r with<br />

Robie House, a masterpiece of <strong>the</strong> period, with its annexes and its ample garden,<br />

which occupied nearly all <strong>the</strong> egg‐shaped space of one of <strong>the</strong> smallest blocks<br />

planned by Olmsted close to <strong>the</strong> river.<br />

97 ZAPATKA, CHRISTIAN The American <strong>landscape</strong>, New York, Princeton Architectural Press, 1995, p. 79<br />

(Italian translation L’architettura del paesaggio <strong>american</strong>o, edited by Mirko Zardini, Milano, Electa,<br />

1995, p. 79)<br />

58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!