20.10.2014 Views

building the american landscape - Univerza v Novi Gorici

building the american landscape - Univerza v Novi Gorici

building the american landscape - Univerza v Novi Gorici

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The grid as <strong>landscape</strong><br />

As anticipated in <strong>the</strong> previous paragraph, <strong>the</strong> success of Jefferson’s ideal of an<br />

agricultural democracy soon merged with <strong>the</strong> events of <strong>the</strong> farmers’ colonisation of<br />

<strong>the</strong> West.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, it has to be stressed that <strong>the</strong> policy for awarding state lands, with<br />

provisions and planning devices established over <strong>the</strong> years, ended by also shaping<br />

<strong>the</strong> development of town and territorial planning.<br />

The endless American suburbia of today is in some way linked to <strong>the</strong>se dynamics.<br />

The ideal of freedom, which developed in contrast to life in <strong>the</strong> cities, was <strong>the</strong><br />

element which undermined <strong>the</strong> integrity of <strong>the</strong> town planning of <strong>the</strong> latter, often<br />

stretching <strong>the</strong>m over too wide a grid. Even though <strong>the</strong> grid had been introduced by<br />

<strong>the</strong> Europeans in <strong>the</strong> first settled towns, we can say today that it is <strong>the</strong> most<br />

straightforward town planning heirloom of frontier America [Figures 45‐46], which<br />

encouraged a sort of counter‐culture of planning focusing on decongestion 82 .<br />

Even though <strong>the</strong> grid is severely limited as it sees <strong>the</strong> territory in only two<br />

dimensions, it enabled cities to be planned and expanded quickly and inexpensively.<br />

As Reps claimed, this checkerboard system from <strong>the</strong> colonial era gave rise to<br />

“senseless mechanized and unimaginative town planning which was to characterize<br />

much of <strong>the</strong> 19 th century” 83 but also to quality town planning solutions, such as<br />

“New Haven, with a generous one‐ninth of <strong>the</strong> original town left as an open green;<br />

or Savannah, with its multiple squares breaking <strong>the</strong> monotony of <strong>the</strong> grid; or<br />

Jeffersonville, with its alternating pattern of open squares and <strong>building</strong> blocks. Even<br />

Philadelphia’s original plan contained <strong>the</strong> five squares laid out by Penn, <strong>the</strong> largest<br />

intended as a town center and <strong>the</strong> four smaller as recreation grounds” 84 .<br />

82 See ESPERDY, Gabrielle, “Defying <strong>the</strong> grid: A Retroactive Manifesto for <strong>the</strong> Culture of<br />

Decongestion”, Perspecta, Vol. 30, The MIT Press, 1999, pp. 10‐33<br />

83 REPS, John William, Town Planning in Frontier America, Princeton, University Press, 1965, p. 428<br />

(Italian translation by M. Terni, S. Magistretti, La costruzione dell’ America urbana, introduction by<br />

Francesco Dal Co, Milano, Franco Angeli, 1976, p. 347)<br />

84 Ibid.<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!