20.10.2014 Views

building the american landscape - Univerza v Novi Gorici

building the american landscape - Univerza v Novi Gorici

building the american landscape - Univerza v Novi Gorici

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Vaux complemented Olmsted, he had a good knowledge of <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ories of <strong>the</strong><br />

picturesque garden, and in addition, he was a skilled designer with varied<br />

experiences and projects behind him. After <strong>the</strong> death of Downing, Vaux had been<br />

able to personally revise <strong>the</strong> ideas of his old partner and friend. Without betraying<br />

<strong>the</strong> spirit underlying <strong>the</strong> first American experience, he had also dedicated himself to<br />

<strong>the</strong> publication of a book entitled Villas and Cottages (1857), which appeared to be<br />

an amalgamation of <strong>the</strong> ideas of Emerson and Ruskin.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> Central Park project, toge<strong>the</strong>r with Olmsted for whom this was his very first<br />

project, Vaux attempted to reintegrate nature into <strong>the</strong> city on <strong>the</strong> basis of<br />

principles, which <strong>the</strong> work of men, such as Henry David Thoreau or George Perkins<br />

Marsh, had disseminated. Olmsted and Vaux conceived an urban park, which was<br />

not just an unbuilt area intended as a green space to meet <strong>the</strong> recreational needs of<br />

<strong>the</strong> citizens of a large city like New York, but which was a project capable of<br />

endorsing <strong>the</strong> recognition of some of nature’s rights and <strong>the</strong> public aims of<br />

<strong>landscape</strong> design [Figures 121‐122]. The “regressive utopias”, designed at <strong>the</strong><br />

beginning of <strong>the</strong> century in both town planning and literature could be seen to have<br />

clearly evolved in <strong>the</strong> daily debate to become a political and city management<br />

problem. There was no longer space for <strong>the</strong> picturesque dreams of Downing’s Mall<br />

project [Figure 117]. Although <strong>the</strong>re were analogies between <strong>the</strong> two projects,<br />

what became clear immediately was <strong>the</strong> different conception of <strong>the</strong> relationship<br />

between city and park. Downing’s separatist project aimed to build a parallel world<br />

as an alternative to that of <strong>the</strong> city, in an attempt to soften <strong>the</strong> contradictions. The<br />

Central Park project followed <strong>the</strong> logic of an innovative style, which featured<br />

winding paths. The programmatic separation between pedestrians and carriages or<br />

for horse riding [Figure 127] implied an awareness that <strong>the</strong> city could flow into<br />

fragments of a specially created, natural and pastoral world. Having won <strong>the</strong><br />

competition, Olmsted was nominated “Architect in Chief of <strong>the</strong> Central Park”, <strong>the</strong><br />

preceding offices of head engineer and superintendant were abolished, and<br />

between 1859 and 1861 <strong>the</strong> main <strong>landscape</strong> work began.<br />

As his first job in his new office, Olmsted gave permission for Vaux and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

assistants to be called in. The two project designers won with a project <strong>the</strong>y called<br />

158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!