20.10.2014 Views

building the american landscape - Univerza v Novi Gorici

building the american landscape - Univerza v Novi Gorici

building the american landscape - Univerza v Novi Gorici

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Careful observation of <strong>the</strong> plan of <strong>the</strong> city in 1800 [Figure 52] clearly shows how <strong>the</strong><br />

checkerboard system had been integrated with <strong>the</strong> six original neighbourhood<br />

pavilions, cancelling forever <strong>the</strong> image of a frontier town and <strong>the</strong> savage <strong>landscape</strong>,<br />

in which <strong>the</strong> town had lain just a few years before [Figure 53].<br />

If we pause for a moment on a single pavilion governed by <strong>the</strong> new grid, we see<br />

how a public space was envisaged in <strong>the</strong> centre and how <strong>the</strong> selling of lands was<br />

subordinated to <strong>the</strong> definition of a road grid that established <strong>the</strong> geometrical order<br />

of <strong>the</strong> structures. By adding new pavilions <strong>the</strong> sides, <strong>the</strong> roads that were once<br />

peripheral automatically became commercial streets, whereas homes usually<br />

fronted <strong>the</strong> central public spaces.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> scheme applied to <strong>the</strong> city of Savannah did not have any particular<br />

influence on American town planning, it connected directly to <strong>the</strong> basic grid logic<br />

behind <strong>the</strong> structure of Broadacre City (1935) [Figure 49‐50]. Wright’s project<br />

adopted <strong>the</strong> grid not merely for its geometrical layout, but also to return to <strong>the</strong><br />

provisions established by <strong>the</strong> Land Ordinance of 1784, which were later<br />

substantially confirmed in <strong>the</strong> subdivision of land following <strong>the</strong> Louisiana Purchase.<br />

SIZE of Land Survey Dimensions in mile miles 2 acres m 2 km 2<br />

Township 6 by 6 36 23040 93.0<br />

Section 1 by 1 1 640 2.6<br />

Half‐section 1 by ½ ½ 320 1.3<br />

Quarter‐section ½ by ½ ¼ 160 647497<br />

Half of quarter‐section ½ by ¼<br />

1⁄8<br />

80 323749<br />

Quarter of quarter‐section ¼ by ¼<br />

1⁄16<br />

40 161874<br />

Broadacre City 4 by 4 16 2560 10.4<br />

Broadacre‐section 1 by 1 1 640 2.6<br />

Broadacre stretches for 4 square miles and <strong>the</strong> module which subtends <strong>the</strong> town<br />

grid consists of <strong>the</strong> Jefferson‐type section of one mile by one mile, so much so that<br />

in <strong>the</strong> project <strong>the</strong> very term section was used by Wright to identify <strong>the</strong> four quarters<br />

of <strong>the</strong> city. Each section identifies <strong>the</strong> 4 areas, amounting to 160 acres each, for an<br />

overall total of 640 acres for <strong>the</strong> entire area of <strong>the</strong> section [Figure 49]. The<br />

individual acres were in turn identified by a rectangular module of 264 x 165 feet<br />

(50 x 80 m), which for Wright represented <strong>the</strong> minimum land unit to associate with<br />

a <strong>building</strong>.<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!