building the american landscape - Univerza v Novi Gorici
building the american landscape - Univerza v Novi Gorici
building the american landscape - Univerza v Novi Gorici
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Olmsted was particularly impressed by <strong>the</strong> use of large, grassy surfaces surrounded<br />
by thick vegetation. The purpose of such a choice of project design was to increase<br />
<strong>the</strong> scenic effect of <strong>the</strong> appearance of a vast open space intended as a playground,<br />
which could only be reached by passing through a little wood. Olmsted also<br />
commented extremely positively on o<strong>the</strong>r projects, believing that “probably <strong>the</strong>re is<br />
no object of art that Americans of cultivated taste generally more long to see in<br />
Europe, than an English park” 217 . Never<strong>the</strong>less, despite Olmsted’s report, <strong>the</strong>re was<br />
no lack of experiments in <strong>landscape</strong> gardening in America. In just a few decades,<br />
attention moved from rural parks to <strong>the</strong> interpretation of rural cemeteries, that is to<br />
say cemeteries which were conceived as proper public spaces, which could be used<br />
thanks to specifically designed pathways through <strong>the</strong> park. Although Olmsted<br />
showed no enthusiasm for rural cemeteries and did not mention <strong>the</strong> phenomenon<br />
in his comparisons to enhance <strong>the</strong> English experiments, contemporary historians of<br />
<strong>the</strong> garden agreed that <strong>the</strong> movement to promote rural cemeteries 218 was of<br />
extreme interest in America. Norman T. Foster, in particular, believed <strong>the</strong> rural<br />
cemetery to be directly connected to <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>landscape</strong> gardening in<br />
urban parks: “It should not be overlooked that a completely American invention,<br />
<strong>the</strong> , may possibly have influenced public interest in park‐like<br />
scenery” 219 . The first of such cemeteries was Mount Auburn, Cambridge,<br />
Massachusetts (1831) [Figure 100], designed by Henry Alexander Scammel<br />
Dearborn (1783‐1851) with Jacob Bigelow (1787‐1879) and Alexander Wadsworth<br />
(1790‐1851). The role of Bigelow 220 was, however, decisive as regards <strong>the</strong> planning<br />
in 1825. As he was a doctor, he believed it necessary to get rid of <strong>the</strong> traditional<br />
practice of burial next to urban churches. He was supported in his <strong>the</strong>ory by<br />
217 Ibid., p. 133<br />
218 See BENDER, Thomas, “The "Rural" Cemetery Movement: Urban Travail and <strong>the</strong> Appeal of<br />
Nature”, Published in The New England Quarterly, Vol. 47, No. 2 (Jun., 1974), pp. 196‐211<br />
219 NEWTON, Norman T., Design on <strong>the</strong> Land. The Development of Landscape Architecture,<br />
Cambridge, Massachusetts, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971, p. 268; as regards<br />
<strong>the</strong> history of <strong>the</strong> cemetery in 19th century in Europe, see <strong>the</strong> article by CURL, James Stevens, “The<br />
Architecture and Planning of <strong>the</strong> Nineteenth‐Century Cemetery”, Garden History, Vol. 3, No. 3<br />
(Summer, 1975), pp. 13‐41<br />
220 Jacob Bigelow (1787‐1879) is <strong>the</strong> author of <strong>the</strong> one of first American medical‐botanical book:<br />
American medical botany, being a collection of <strong>the</strong> native medicinal plants of <strong>the</strong> United States,<br />
containing <strong>the</strong>ir botanical history and chemical analysis, and properties and uses in medicine, diet<br />
and <strong>the</strong> arts, with coloured engravings, Boston, Cummings and Hillard, 1817<br />
134