31.10.2014 Views

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tussock space (Stuwe and Parsons 1977, Morgan 1995b, Morgan 1997, Morgan 1998b, Henderson 1999). T. triandra is generally<br />

the only native plant with high cover and frequency and most native species have low cover and low frequency (Morgan and<br />

Rollason 1995). Germination <strong>of</strong> a high proportion <strong>of</strong> species requires exposure to light, but otherwise there are no specialised<br />

germination requirements in the majority <strong>of</strong> species (Robinson 2003). Regular opening <strong>of</strong> canopy gaps, e.g. by burning, is<br />

required for forb seedling recruitment (Morgan 1995b, Sharp 1997), but actual removal <strong>of</strong> vegetation, with associated soil<br />

disturbance is probably even more effective (Robinson 2003). The dominant tussock <strong>grass</strong>es may not only command most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

space and light but may also starve the intertussock species <strong>of</strong> moisture and nutrients (Keith 2004). T. triandra has been said not<br />

to compete directly for resources with the annual (exotic) <strong>grass</strong>es (Morgan 1994), but agricultural experience suggests that the<br />

exotic annuals deplete soil moisture prior to the main T. triandra growth period. Germination and establishment <strong>of</strong> T. triandra<br />

has also been reported to be unaffected by weeds (McDougall 1989, Morgan 1994 citing Hagon 1977) but there is likely to be a<br />

threshold above which it will be affected (Morgan 1994).<br />

None <strong>of</strong> the native perennial intertussock species in existing native temperate <strong>grass</strong>lands are obligate seed regenerators, almost<br />

all being obligate resprouters, or resprouting and with limited seedling production, and mostly able to set, and actually setting,<br />

seed within 12 months <strong>of</strong> regeneration (Lunt 1990c, Morgan 1996, Lunt and Morgan 2002). Austral Toadflax Thesium australe<br />

R.Br. (Santalaceae) a peculiar semi-parasitic semi-shrub, once common in T. triandra <strong>grass</strong>lands, has a ruderal strategy, is shortlived<br />

(Keith 2004) and apparently dependent on annual seedling recruitment, but populations no longer exist at lowland<br />

<strong>grass</strong>land sites (Scarlett and Parsons 1993). Hosts <strong>of</strong> this species include T. triandra and a range <strong>of</strong> other native and introduced<br />

herbs and <strong>grass</strong>es (Keith 2004). At sites investigated by Morgan (1996) all perennial species but one had flowered 12 months<br />

after a late-spring fire. Only 19% <strong>of</strong> native perennials regenerated from seed after a fire at Derrimut (Lunt 1990c) and only one<br />

native species was present in the seed bank that was not found in the standing vegetation (Lunt 1990b). In a study <strong>of</strong> five western<br />

Victorian <strong>grass</strong>lands Morgan (1998c) found that only 12% <strong>of</strong> species, all annuals, formed large, persistent seed banks and that<br />

most native hemicryptophytes and perennials in general had a transient seed bank. T. triandra and perennial native forbs were<br />

present in the seed bank at “exceedingly low densities at all times” (Morgan 1998c p. 150).<br />

Little is known about the persistence <strong>of</strong> native forbs in temperate <strong>Australia</strong>n <strong>grass</strong>lands (Lunt 1996). Morgan (1995) found viable<br />

seeds <strong>of</strong> Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides in the seed bank only immediately after seed shed. All the seed <strong>of</strong> this species germinated<br />

within 4 months <strong>of</strong> shedding, immediately after autumns rains, and any seed that had not germinated by this time was either dead<br />

or had been “eaten by soil invertebrates” (op. cit. p. 5). Lunt (1996) found that no viable seeds <strong>of</strong> Microseris scapigera (G.<br />

Forst.) Sch. Bip. (Asteraceae) buried or placed in mesh bags under the canopy in a long unburnt T. triandra <strong>grass</strong>land in<br />

Canberra remained after 3 months and that virtually all germinated rapidly. Lunt (1995a) tested seeds <strong>of</strong> three native lilies and<br />

three other native daisies in the same way and found that >90% <strong>of</strong> the seeds <strong>of</strong> all but one species germinated or were unviable<br />

after 12 months, although greater longevity was recorded for some species if the seed was buried or on the surface. The daisy<br />

Chrysocephalum apiculatum (Labill.) Steetz. appeared to have the highest potential to develop a persistent seed bank, due to<br />

small seed size, inhibition <strong>of</strong> germination in darkness and an ability to remain viable when buried. The perennial native plant<br />

seed bank as a whole appears to usually be small and highly transient (Lunt and Morgan 2002), seedlings are generally<br />

uncommon (e.g. Morgan 1998d), most seed germinates or dies within 12 months, and only perennial forbs with small seeds (e.g.<br />

Hypericum gramineum, Juncus spp., Wahlenbergia spp.) have large, persistent seed banks (Lunt and Morgan 2002). The longterm<br />

native seed bank was considered to probably have “little functional importance” and “contribute little to seedling<br />

regeneration processes following disturbance” (Morgan 1998c). Scarlett (1994) reported a similar problem with plantings and<br />

direct seeding <strong>of</strong> native dicotyledonous <strong>grass</strong>land herbs: they set abundant seed, but had very low germination and seedling<br />

survival.<br />

Species with transient seed banks are a common feature <strong>of</strong> world <strong>grass</strong>lands and “are normally able to exploit gaps in <strong>grass</strong>land<br />

canopies ... created by seasonally-predictable disturbances such as fire, drought and grazing”: their seeds usually germinate<br />

whether or not suitable seedling establishment sites are available (Morgan 1995a p. 7).<br />

In basalt plains <strong>grass</strong>land sites with a history <strong>of</strong> frequent fire the hemicryptophyte (‘resprouter’) rosetted forbs, including many<br />

<strong>of</strong> the common native forbs, had low turnover and mobility (Morgan 1997), as would be expected with a very low seed bank<br />

(Morgan 1998c). In total, 30% <strong>of</strong> species (notably geophytes) appeared to remain dormant underground in some years, despite a<br />

stable management regime (Morgan 1997). A high proportion <strong>of</strong> the seed bank in these <strong>grass</strong>lands consists <strong>of</strong> annuals which are<br />

largely exotic species (Morgan 1998c 1998d, Lunt and Morgan 2002). The annual monocots have a high turnover and high<br />

mobility (Morgan 1997). Native hemicryptophytes, chamaephytes and geophytes are largely absent from the seed bank (Morgan<br />

1998c). Exotic species overwhelming dominate the soil seed bank in grazed <strong>grass</strong>lands in Victoria and Tasmania, with annual<br />

<strong>grass</strong>es, legumes and R. rosea being major components (Lunt 1995a). Dodd et al.(2007) found that native species comprised<br />

only 13% <strong>of</strong> the soil seed bank <strong>of</strong> six roadside <strong>grass</strong>lands along a 200 km urban-rural gradient west from Melbourne and that<br />

similarities between the species composition <strong>of</strong> the seed bank and the above ground flora was low and declined in more rural<br />

sites. Exotic annual graminoids dominated the seed banks (Dodd et al. 2007) with Juncus capitatus, Isolepis sp. and Aira spp.<br />

being the most abundant (Aaron Dodd pers. comm. October 2007).<br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> recruitment <strong>of</strong> inter-tussock species is a widespread problem in native <strong>grass</strong>lands: inadequate seed availability appears to<br />

be the dominant cause, rather than weed competition or climatic stress (McDougall and Morgan 2005). Many species <strong>of</strong> native<br />

forbs may be physiologically unable to produce seeds with innate dormancy (Morgan 1998c). Instead the plants are long lived<br />

and rarely recruit from seed. According to Benson (1994) the major transformation <strong>of</strong> native <strong>grass</strong>land have resulted in<br />

widespread loss <strong>of</strong> long-lived, deep rooted perennials and their replacement with more ephemeral exotics.<br />

The native <strong>grass</strong>land flora is also notable for the absence <strong>of</strong> myrmechorous (ant dispersed) species, in contrast to <strong>Australia</strong>n<br />

forests, woodlands and heaths (Berg 1975). Very few <strong>of</strong> the 87 myrmecochorous genera mentioned by Berg (1975) are present in<br />

these <strong>grass</strong>lands and these may be viewed usually as ‘trespassers’ from <strong>grass</strong>y woodlands. In general however seed dispersal<br />

processes in these <strong>grass</strong>lands have not been studied.<br />

101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!