31.10.2014 Views

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(Honaine et al. 2006). The flechillar (Nassella-Piptochaetium) community in this area has especially high biodiversity and is<br />

ecologically significant as a faunal refuge (Honaine et al. 2009).<br />

To the north in Argentina, in the department <strong>of</strong> Gualeguay in the south <strong>of</strong> Entre Rios Province, N. neesiana occurred in<br />

undulating treeless plains covered in <strong>grass</strong>es (Marco 1950), an area classed as Mesopotamic Pampa and characterised by a more<br />

subtropical climate (annual rainfall c. 900-1200 mm), and a network <strong>of</strong> water courses lined with gallery forest (Soriano et al.<br />

1992). Stipoids generally are <strong>of</strong> lesser importance in this formation than in the southern pampas, but N. neesiana was one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

dominants along with N. tenuissima, Eragrostis cilianensis (All.) Janchen. and species <strong>of</strong> Axonopus, Paspalum, Digitaria,<br />

Schizachyrium and Bothriochloa (Soriano et al. 1992).<br />

The Flooding Pampa, an extremely flat coastal plain covering 9000 km 2 (Perelman et al. 2001) in eastern Buenos Aires province<br />

that includes the Laprida and Río Salada basins and extends in tongues into the interior (Soriano et al. 1992), has some dominant<br />

<strong>grass</strong>es in common with Rolling Pampa but N. neesiana is not a major species (Soriano et al. 1992). Nevertheless it occurs<br />

through most <strong>of</strong> the region across its latitudinal range (c. 35-38°S) and with a frequency <strong>of</strong> ≥20% (in 25 m 2 samples) in 8 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

11 Flooding Pampa <strong>grass</strong>land community types identified by Perelman et al. (2001), reaching a frequency <strong>of</strong> 87% in one<br />

community. In the Flooding Pampa it has been classified in a three-species floristic group with Jarava plumosa (Spreng.) S.W.L.<br />

Jacobs and J. Everett (as Stipa papposa) and Bothriochloa laguroides (Perelman et al. 2001).<br />

N. neesiana is <strong>of</strong> minor importance in most <strong>of</strong> the Inland Pampa, a drier, more open <strong>grass</strong>land, lacking a river and stream<br />

network, found to the west and south-west <strong>of</strong> Rolling Pampa. However it is one <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> <strong>grass</strong>es <strong>of</strong> lesser importance in a<br />

community dominated by Poa ligularis, Nassella tenuissima, N. trichotoma, N. filiculmis (Delile) Barkworth and Panicum<br />

urvilleanum Kunth on the border between the provinces <strong>of</strong> Buenos Aires and La Pampa (Soriano et al. 1992). Its minor<br />

importance in the Caldenal, an ecotonal region between the Humid Pampa and the Monte desert, is reflective <strong>of</strong> the regional<br />

climate with an annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> 300-400 mm concentrated from spring to autumn, annual potential evaporation <strong>of</strong> 800 mm and<br />

cooler temperatures than the pampas (Fernández et al. 2009).<br />

Little native <strong>grass</strong>land remains in Uruguay, and protected areas <strong>of</strong> natural <strong>grass</strong>land landscape are non existent (Cosse et al.<br />

2009). In the Juan Jackson region <strong>of</strong> south-western Uruguay N. neesiana was considered to be the third most important <strong>grass</strong> in<br />

“virgin and regenerated” caespitose <strong>grass</strong>lands on granitic soils, after Piptochaetium stipoides (Trin. and Rupr.) Hackel ex<br />

Arech. and P. montevidense (Spreng.) Parodi (Gallinal Heber et al. 1946). Soriano et al. (1992) considered it to be the most<br />

frequent <strong>grass</strong> in the Southern Campos, a formation extending over most <strong>of</strong> southern part <strong>of</strong> the country, along with other<br />

Nassella spp., Paspalum spp., Poa spp. and other <strong>grass</strong>es. On deep fertile soils the natural vegetation was probably dominated by<br />

Nassella charruana. In the Atlantic coastal south-eastern plain Stipeae are less abundant, being displaced by an abundance <strong>of</strong><br />

subtropical genera, and are dominant only in relatively restricted “upland prairies” located on hills and knolls with shallow soils,<br />

dry in the summer (Iriarte 2006).<br />

In Brazil N.neesiana is most common in ‘cleared and treed fields’ (rough translation <strong>of</strong> Longhi-Wagner and Zanin 1998). It is<br />

not an important component <strong>of</strong> the natural vegetation <strong>of</strong> the Northern Campos <strong>of</strong> northern Uruguay and the campos <strong>of</strong> the<br />

southern Brazilian State <strong>of</strong> Rio Grande du Sol, which have fewer Stipeae and more numerous representatives <strong>of</strong> Paniceae and<br />

Andropogoneae (Soriano et al. 1992). N. neesiana was not found by Overbeck and Pfadenhauer (2007) in surveys on Morro<br />

Santana, near Porto Alegre in Rio Grande do Sul, near the eastern edge <strong>of</strong> Brazilian campos, an area with rainfall exceeding<br />

1200 mm per annum and no dry season, but Overbeck et al. (2007 p. 106) list it (as Stipa setigera C. Presl) as a subtropical area<br />

“characteristic” species <strong>of</strong> <strong>grass</strong>lands in the southern Rio Grande do Sul <strong>of</strong> Brazil, along with N. megapotamia, N. nutans (Hack.)<br />

Barkworth and N. philippii (Steud.) Barkworth. The northern boundary <strong>of</strong> the Pampean province <strong>of</strong> southern Brazil is at about<br />

30°S (Overbeck and Pfadenhauer 2007).<br />

On the Juan Fernández Islands <strong>of</strong> Chile it is found on rocky slopes near the sea, in dry or humid gorges, rocky cliffs, on and<br />

between rocks and in open places (translation from Baeza et al. 2007).<br />

In south-western Europe most exotic Stipeae occur on disturbed land or higly modified areas and have failed so far to occupy<br />

more natural areas, with the exception, to date, <strong>of</strong> N. neesiana, which “penetrates into natural, protected areas ... and behaves like<br />

an aggressive invader” in the Canary Islands (Verloove 2005) e.g. in the Garajonay National Park, Anaga Rural Park and Osorio<br />

Reserve (Sanz-Elorza et al. 2005). Since the mid 1960s it gradually spread along roads and through gaps and sparse vegetation<br />

on the island <strong>of</strong> Tenerife in nitrogen enriched environments (Martín Osorio et al. 2000). The larger Tenerife infestations occur on<br />

hard, basaltic substrates (Martín Osorio et al. 2000). South-western European N. neesiana “inhabits a wide range <strong>of</strong> usually<br />

anthropogenic biotopes varying from road-verges, abandoned vineyards, urban parks ... more or less ruderalized pastures, etc.”<br />

but also occupying rocky slopes in river valleys in France and Italy (Verloove 2005 p. 108). In Catalonia (Spain) small<br />

populations have been found on path margins and in abandoned vineyards (Font et al. 2001).<br />

In New Zealand it occurs mainly in pastures and on roadsides (Edgar and Connor 2000) in dry, low-fertility, open habitats<br />

(Bourdôt and Ryde 1986) on various soil types, but not normally in fertile pastures where there is good competition from other<br />

plants (Bourdôt and Ryde 1986, Auckland Regional Council 2002). It occurs on “rolling hills and flats” at Waipawa (Bourdôt<br />

and Ryde 1987a), and <strong>of</strong>ten occurs on “steep inaccessible eroded land” (Bourdôt 1988). It invades unimproved pastures,<br />

infesting two <strong>of</strong> seven paddocks dominated by native tussock <strong>grass</strong>es in the Lake Grassmere area (Bourdôt and Hurrell 1989a).<br />

Its invasiveness in New Zealand sheep pastures was attributed by Bourdôt and Hurrell (1989a) to adaptations enabling survival<br />

in semi-arid, poorly fertile environments, rather that high competitive ability.<br />

The little information available on the native vegetation formations invaded by N. neesiana in areas <strong>of</strong> its exotic range outside<br />

<strong>Australia</strong> is summarised in Table 3.<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!