31.10.2014 Views

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

identified as Stipa. neesiana by Dr. J.R. Swallen but also referred to also as “Stipa sp.?”, had 2n = 60. It differed<br />

morphologically from the tetraploid specimens, “but it was not possible to clarify the identification” (Bowden and Senn 1962 p.<br />

1122). According to Moraldo (1986) N. neesiana is tetraploid with 2n = 44.<br />

The lowest known chromosome count <strong>of</strong> a stipoid species is n =10 in a Piptatherum sp. and the highest are n = 41 and n = 48<br />

(Barkworth and Everett 1986). In Stipa (sens. lat.) and Oryzopsis (sens. lat.) the chromosome numbers range from n = 11 to at<br />

least n = 41 (including n = 12, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 32, 33, 34, 35), a situation that can be explained by recurrent<br />

amphiploidy, i.e. combinations <strong>of</strong> autopolyploidy (simple doubling <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> chromosomes in an individual) and<br />

allopolyploidy (hybridisation <strong>of</strong> diploid and/or polyploid individuals), begining with n = 6 and n = 5 (Johnson 1972). In most<br />

European Stipa species that have been studied 2n = 44 (Tsvelev 1977, Moore 1982), derived through aneuploidy from a primary<br />

basic number <strong>of</strong> 2n = 22 (De Wet 1986). Of other European species, S. capensis Thunb. 2n = 34, 36, S. parviflora Desf. and S.<br />

bromoides (L.) Dörfler 2n = 28, and S. gigantea Link 2n = 96 (Moore 1982, Tsvelev 1984, Moraldo 1986). 2n = 24 in many<br />

Achnatherum spp. (Tsvelev 1977). Among other South American stipoids, 2n = 40 in Jarava plumosa (Spreng.) S.W.L. Jacobs<br />

and J. Everett, 2n = 42 and 44 in J.ichu Ruiz and Pavon and 2n = 40 and 44 in Amelichloa brachychaeta (Godr.) Arriaga and<br />

Barkworth (Bowden and Senn 1962). Of the North American species, 2n = 24 in Piptatherum pungens (Torrey) Dorn, 2n = 44 in<br />

Heterostipa comata (Trin. and Rupr.) Barkworth and 2n = 48 in Oryzopsis asperifolia Michaux and Piptatherum racemosa (Sm.)<br />

Barkworth (Barkworth 2006). Stipa sens. str. has a base number <strong>of</strong> 11, while the base number <strong>of</strong> Acnatherum is unclear but<br />

frequently cited as 11 or 12 (Vásquez and Barkworth 2004).<br />

Among the North American Nassella species, n = 11 in N. pungens E.Desv., n = 16 in N. tenuissima, n = 17 in N. lepida<br />

(Hitchc.) Barkworth, n = 23 in N. tucumana (Parodi) Torres, n = 32 in N. pulchra (Hitchc.) Barkworth, n =35 in N. cernua<br />

(Stebbins and Love) Barkworth and n = 41 in N. viridula (Trin.) Barkworth (Johnson 1972). However N. tenuissima material<br />

from Argentina examined by Bowden and Senn (1962) had a diploid number <strong>of</strong> 40, different from that <strong>of</strong> Texas plants. Of the<br />

South American species, 2n = 34 in N. hyalina, 2n = 36 in N. charruana, 2n = 36 and 38 in N. trichotoma, 2n = 42 in N. chilensis<br />

(Trin.) E. Desv., and N. exserta Phil., 2n = 64 in N. mucronata (Kunth) R.W. Pohl, 2n = 66 in N. lachnophylla (Trin.) Barkworth<br />

(Bowden and Senn 1962). But according to Watson and Dallwitz (2005) 2n = 38 in N. trichotoma.<br />

Genetic variation<br />

Grass species <strong>of</strong>ten possess wide racial or ecoytpic variation within their populations, partial discontinuities <strong>of</strong> phenotypes<br />

resulting from self-fertilisation, hybrid sterility between phenotypically similar populations, and other features, including<br />

polyploidy, that tend to obscure species boundaries (Stebbins 1972). Ecotype variation is known for N. trichotoma in <strong>Australia</strong><br />

(Michalk et al. 2002) but has not been recorded for N. neesiana.<br />

Britt (2001) and Britt et al. (2002) sought evidence <strong>of</strong> genotypic variation in <strong>Australia</strong>n populations. They compared four<br />

Victorian (Altona, Melton, Bacchus Marsh and Tarrawingee) and two New South Wales (Armidale and New England<br />

Tablelands) populations, using three molecular genetic pr<strong>of</strong>iling methods:<br />

1. ITS – RFLP. Internal transcribed spacer - restriction fragment length polymorphism – a method for cutting the DNA at<br />

particular short sequences <strong>of</strong> nucleotides using restriction endonucleases – the polymorphisms in the restriction fragments<br />

are RFLPs and variation in the size <strong>of</strong> the RFLPs is dependent on the particular sequence recognised by each endonuclease.<br />

The ITS is a moderately conserved region <strong>of</strong> nuclear ribosomal DNA, and differences in its length and base pair pattern<br />

have revealed taxonomic patterns in <strong>grass</strong>es and enabled accurate scoring <strong>of</strong> their genotypes (Britt 2001).<br />

2. ITS – PCR sequencing. Using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to generate large quantities <strong>of</strong> DNA to enable<br />

sequencing <strong>of</strong> the ITS region.<br />

3. RAPD - PCR. Using PCR and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis on the whole genome. The technique<br />

allows differentiation <strong>of</strong> closely related organisms or even single base changes by display <strong>of</strong> the DNA banding patterns<br />

using gel electrophoresis.<br />

DNA was extracted from between 18 and 10 plants grown from seeds collected in each geographical area (Britt 2001 p. 21), but<br />

no indication was provided <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> individuals sampled from each population, their spatial arrangement in the source<br />

area, or the date <strong>of</strong> sampling (Britt 2001, Britt et al. 2002). The plants from which DNA were extracted were grown from seed<br />

collected in a particular area, but that seed could have been harvested from a single mother plant, and even if multiple mother<br />

plants were sampled a variable proportion <strong>of</strong> the seed from each would be cleistogamous. Thus all the individuals from which<br />

DNA was extracted for a particular area could have been genetically identical because <strong>of</strong> inadequate population sampling.<br />

No variation was found in the size <strong>of</strong> the ITS region (650 base pairs) or in the ITS-RFLP patterns tested. ITS sequencing<br />

revealed uniformity within the plants analysed from a particular area, but differences between plants from different areas,<br />

unrelated to their geographical proximity. All areas had shared homologies above 90%, suggesting conspecificity, except for<br />

Bacchus Marsh and Tarrawingee populations, but no one else appear to have suggested these populations are not N. neesiana.<br />

98% homology – suggestive <strong>of</strong> convarietal status – was shared only by Altona and New England samples (Britt 2001). Jacobs et<br />

al. (2000) also analysed sequence data <strong>of</strong> the ITS region <strong>of</strong> nuclear rDNA and found no variation within the species tested,<br />

however, again, the number and intra-population source <strong>of</strong> their samples were not published. Britt’s (2001) RAPDs showed<br />

inter- but not intra-area variation but no consistent area groupings. Comparison <strong>of</strong> population differences using the two different<br />

methods produced two inconsistent ‘distance tree’ structures. ITS data indicated that the Melton population was most similar to<br />

N. leucotricha (Britt et al. 2002), suggesting the possibility that some hybridisation may be occurring. Jacobs et al. (2000)<br />

indicated that they are sister species.<br />

Britt (2001) and Britt et al. (2002) concluded that <strong>Australia</strong>n N. neesiana possesses large genetic variation between areas (a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> subspecies/varieties – the terms were used interchangably – are present), that this may have arisen locally, and that<br />

local populations have no variation, so must have arisen via cleistogenes or seeds fertilised only by local pollen.The latter<br />

argument is flawed because Britt (2001) failed to demonstrate that the real population variation in each area was sampled. It is<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!