31.10.2014 Views

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

taxonomic patterns <strong>of</strong> protein amino acids in leaves and caryopses <strong>of</strong> <strong>grass</strong>es, but provided only aggregrate data at the tribal<br />

level. Seeds <strong>of</strong> Stipeae are high in Asx (aspartic acid or asparagine), glycine, methionine and arginine and low in glutamic acid,<br />

proline, alanine and leucine. They are nutritionally richer than seeds <strong>of</strong> Danthonieae, Aristida, Chloridoideae and Panicoideae,<br />

have protein contents equivalent to cultivated cereals and superior nutritional value to wheat, sorghum and maize varieties. The<br />

“Stipa” spp. analysed (including Nassella spp.) in aggregate are very similar to Oryza in leaf protein pattern except that Stipeae<br />

are lower in alanine and higher in valine. Stipeae, Oryza and Ehrharteae have the lowest free Glx (glutamic acid or glutamine)<br />

and the highest free Asx levels in the Poaceae. The variation in leaf amino acids are “unlikely” to be <strong>of</strong> any nutritional<br />

importance for mammals but may influence insect herbivory.<br />

Investigations have recently been undertaken by the Victorian Department <strong>of</strong> Primary Industries in an attempt to identify<br />

molecular fingerprinting techniques for identification <strong>of</strong> Nassella spp. (David McLaren, DPI, pers. comm.) but results have not<br />

been published.<br />

Breeding system<br />

N. neesiana is self fertile (Connor et al. 1993) but can cross pollinate. It produces both chasmogamous and cleistogamous panicle<br />

seeds, along with concealed cleistogamous seeds on the stem nodes (Slay 2002c) (see discussions above on floral morphology).<br />

Such a breeding system is well suited to colonising <strong>grass</strong>land habitats (Evans and Young 1972).<br />

Cleistogamy is more common in <strong>grass</strong>es than any other plant family and occurs in c. 19% <strong>of</strong> genera and 5% <strong>of</strong> species (Groves<br />

and Whalley 2002). Culley and Klooster (2007) found that it had been reported in 326 <strong>grass</strong> species, including 41 spp. <strong>of</strong> Stipa<br />

and 5 <strong>of</strong> Nassella. Two types <strong>of</strong> cleistogamy occur in Nassella, complete and dimorphic. Plants that are completely<br />

cleistogamous produce only cleistogamous flowers. Plants with dimorphic cleistogamy have both chasmogamous and<br />

cleistogamous flowers, the latter characterised by prominent differences in floral morphology including reduction in size or<br />

number <strong>of</strong> floral parts. In the cleistogamous flowers <strong>of</strong> <strong>grass</strong>es, the anthers, pollen sacs, stamens, stigmas, and lodicules are much<br />

reduced in size and the flowers develop no further than the bud stage (Brown 1952). The different flower types can be separated<br />

spatially on the plant, or temporally (<strong>of</strong>ten seasonally), or both, and in some plant species the ratio <strong>of</strong> flower types can vary<br />

between individuals and populations (Culley and Klooster 2007). The proportion <strong>of</strong> cleistogamous and chasmogamous florets in<br />

<strong>grass</strong> species is <strong>of</strong>ten under environmental control, e.g. Amphicarpum purshii produces few cleistogenous seeds after fire, but<br />

larger numbers as the likelihood <strong>of</strong> fire becomes high (Groves and Whalley 2002, citing Quinn 1998). Brown (1952) found that<br />

such facultative or ecological cleistogamy occurred in Nassella leucotricha in response to low availability <strong>of</strong> soil water. The<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> cleistogamous and chasmogmaous fruits in the panicle depended on the soil water potential at the time <strong>of</strong> floral<br />

initiation.<br />

Chasmogamy allows for gene exchange between individuals via pollen, and has population and evolutionary advantages where<br />

there is greater environmental variability, or the prevailing genotypes produce phenotypes that are poorly adapted. Cleistogamy,<br />

on the other hand, ensures self fertilisation with consquent high uniformity <strong>of</strong> genotype frequencies, so maintains the existing<br />

frequencies <strong>of</strong> locally adapted phenotypes and genotypes (Groves and Whalley 2002, Culley and Klooster 2007). Meiosis occurs<br />

in both gametes <strong>of</strong> the cleistogamous flower, so gene resorting does occur (Groves and Whalley 2002), enabling continued<br />

“repatterning <strong>of</strong> the gene pool, differing only in degree from [that in] outbreeding populations” (Evans and Young 1972 p. 235).<br />

Cleistogamous seeds may be energetically less expensive to produce because <strong>of</strong> their greater rate <strong>of</strong> fertilisation and savings in<br />

pollen (Connor 1986), so the seeds can be larger (Culley and Klooster 2007). However in N. neesiana they are generally<br />

smaller,with much reduction in the size <strong>of</strong> the appenedages. Cleistogamy has disadvantages, including increased inbreeding<br />

depression and the aforementioneddecreased genetic variation (Culley and Klooster 2007). Dimorphic cleistogamy requires that<br />

each flower/seed type <strong>of</strong>fers specific selective advantages. In <strong>grass</strong>es, the most important <strong>of</strong> these may be the differential<br />

dispersability <strong>of</strong> the seed types. Variation in the incidence <strong>of</strong> cleistogamy in the panicle <strong>of</strong> N. neesiana does not appear to have<br />

been studied, nor have potential environmental influences <strong>of</strong> facultative cleistogamy.<br />

Reproduction in N. neesiana is probably entirely sexual; apomixis, <strong>of</strong>ten evident by the production <strong>of</strong> twin seedlings from a<br />

single seed (Groves and Whalley 2002), does not seem to have been reported (e.g. Puhar 1996).<br />

Seed production<br />

In comparison to most other <strong>grass</strong>es the panicle seed <strong>of</strong> N. neesiana is large, and relatively few are produced per plant. In<br />

pastures at Waipawa, New Zealand, 793 ±128 culms m -2 were present in a pure ungrazed sward in pasture, and potential seed<br />

yield per panicle was 38, indicating a potential annual panicle seed yield <strong>of</strong> c. 30,000 m -2 (Slay 2001). In dense, ungrazed<br />

infestations on the Northern Tablelands <strong>of</strong> NSW Gardener et al. (1999 2003a) recorded maximum production <strong>of</strong> 1,584 panicle<br />

seed m -2 in 1995 (the preceding year and spring being as dry) and 22,203 panicle seed m -2 in 1996 (above average rainfall),<br />

determined from the number <strong>of</strong> infloresences m -2 and the number <strong>of</strong> glume pairs per inflorescence. The variation between the<br />

drought year and the wet year resulted from changes in the number <strong>of</strong> panicles m -2 .<br />

Gardener’s (1998) figure <strong>of</strong> 22,000 has subsequently been widely quoted (e.g. “20,000” in Snell et al. 2007). However the spring<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1995 was actually exceptionally wet (see Gardener 1998 Fig. 3.2 on p. 22) and may have resulted in a mast seeding event,<br />

accounting for the c. 14 fold increase in the estimated seed production over the previous year, and a c. 3.7 fold higher production<br />

than 1997. Masting has been defined as “synchronous highly variable seed production among years by a population” (Kelly et al.<br />

2008) and may have evolved as a a seed-predator satiation strategy (Kelly et al. 1992). The prime characteristic <strong>of</strong> masting<br />

events is that a very high proportion <strong>of</strong> the population reproduce massively in mast years and poorly in non-mast years, cued by<br />

weather events (Kelly et al. 2008). Masting has been described in a number <strong>of</strong> long-lived tussock <strong>grass</strong>es including Stipa<br />

tenacissima, and appears to result from the build up <strong>of</strong> stored reserves and rapid responses to high water availability during the<br />

growing season (Haase et al. 1995). Conversely, poor seed set is a feature <strong>of</strong> dry years and drought periods. Bountiful weather is<br />

required for mass-seeding, but predator satiation, in which a much larger proportion <strong>of</strong> the seed crop survives in mast years than<br />

non-mast years, accounts for the evolutionary benefits <strong>of</strong> the phenomenon, at least in New Zealand Chionchloa <strong>grass</strong>es (Kelly et<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!