31.10.2014 Views

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

D’Antonio 1998 p. 195). Alterations to fire regimes are the best documented (Versfeld and van Wilgen 1986, D’Antonio and<br />

Vitousek 1992, Grice 2006), along with invasions by woody weeds (Adair and Groves 1998).<br />

Altered disturbance regimes are less likely when the invasive species differs little from the natives, but subtly different<br />

organisms can produce subtle changes (Mack and D’Antonio 1998). Permanent changes to disturbance regimes and successional<br />

pathways eventually result in conversion <strong>of</strong> the system to a new state.<br />

Ecosystem function and ecosytem services<br />

<strong>Weeds</strong> that significantly modify ecosystem function affect the living conditions <strong>of</strong> all the other species in the system, and thus<br />

have the most pr<strong>of</strong>ound effects on biodiversity (Adair and Groves 1998). Most studies <strong>of</strong> these impacts have involved<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> invaded and uninvaded areas and require cautious interpretation because the mechanisms that enable one system<br />

to be invaded and not the other are usually poorly understood (Levine et al. 2003).<br />

Woody weed invasions <strong>of</strong> South African fynbos have resulted in major declines in stream flows and water yield (Versfeld and<br />

van Wilgen 1986, Versfeld et al. 1998). Mechanisms <strong>of</strong> impact include increased interception <strong>of</strong> rainfall, increased transpiration<br />

and changes in infiltration and erosion rates (Versfeld and van Wilgen 1986). Invasive species impacts can also result in<br />

reductions in water use (Levine et al. 2003) and thus increased flooding and habitat change. The replacement <strong>of</strong> native perennial<br />

bunch<strong>grass</strong>es by annual exotic <strong>grass</strong>es in California <strong>grass</strong>lands has decreased the amount <strong>of</strong> C they store (see references in<br />

Seabloom et al. 2003), and consequently the amount <strong>of</strong> atmospheric CO 2 and the extent <strong>of</strong> global warming. <strong>Impact</strong>s on nutrient<br />

cycling have been widely investigated with a focus on nitrogen (particularly in <strong>grass</strong>lands) and leguminous plants (Levine et al.<br />

2003).<br />

In the most extreme cases weeds threaten whole ecosystems or ecosystem units, either by creating a new vegetation stratum or<br />

by altering major ecosystem properties (Adair and Groves 1998). Acacia nilotica (L.) Delile thickets threaten Mitchell Grass<br />

<strong>grass</strong>lands in the Northern Territory and northern Queensland by creating a dense overstorey, with over 1 million ha infested by<br />

1992 (Parsons and Cuthbertson 1992). The <strong>grass</strong>-fire feedback cycle (D’Antonio and Vitousek 1992), where the biomass <strong>of</strong> an<br />

invasive <strong>grass</strong> enhances fire (see below) is transforming ecosystems around the world.<br />

<strong>Impact</strong>s on the delivery <strong>of</strong> ecosystem goods and services may be evident, but few studies have quantified the effects at regional<br />

or wider scales (Richardson and van Wilgen 2004).<br />

Management regimes<br />

Management activities are targetted at significant weeds and <strong>of</strong>ten have unintended consequences. Attempts to reduce the<br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> Nassella trichotoma in Victoria by establishment <strong>of</strong> trees have attracted criticism that they will also eliminate the<br />

native <strong>grass</strong>land remnants in which the weed is growing. Similarly, herbicidal control <strong>of</strong> exotic stipoid <strong>grass</strong>es in Melbourne area<br />

<strong>grass</strong>lands has been criticised for its severe impact on native plants.<br />

Invasive <strong>grass</strong>es - impacts and threats<br />

Useful <strong>grass</strong>es have been widely introduced as forage plants for livestock and for other purposes, and many <strong>grass</strong>es <strong>of</strong> less forage<br />

value have dispersed widely without deliberate human intervention. In many cases they have replaced native <strong>grass</strong>es, being the<br />

agents, the beneficiaries, or both agents and beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> ecosystem transformation. These transformations have taken place<br />

in many <strong>of</strong> the major temperate <strong>grass</strong>land regions <strong>of</strong> the world. North American <strong>grass</strong>lands have been subjected to massive<br />

changes through the deliberate introduction <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> <strong>grass</strong>es considered superior for livestock production including<br />

Bothriochloa spp. (Schmidt et al. 2008). The <strong>grass</strong>lands <strong>of</strong> the Llanos, Venezuela, and savannah-forest in the Cerrado, Brazil,<br />

both supported cattle grazing, but the Spanish and Portuguese immigrants considered the native <strong>grass</strong>es inferior and by the late<br />

18th century had intoduced African species such as Brachiaria mutica (Forrsk.) Stapf, Melinis minutiflora P. Beauv. and<br />

Panicum maximum Jacq., which are now the dominant species in huge areas <strong>of</strong> tropical and subtropical Latin America (Mack<br />

and Lonsdale 2001). Similar transformations have occurred in <strong>Australia</strong>.<br />

Poaceae is one <strong>of</strong> few plant families that consistently provides a high proportion <strong>of</strong> invasive species relative to its total taxa<br />

(Rejmánek 2000). Poaceae is probably the dominant weed family in <strong>Australia</strong> in terms <strong>of</strong> areas occupied and species diversity.<br />

Poaceae represent about 14% (375 spp.) <strong>of</strong> all naturalised vascular plant species in <strong>Australia</strong>, and 141 spp. (37.6%) are<br />

considered major weeds (Grice 2004b). There are more species and infraspecific taxa <strong>of</strong> Poaceae in the exotic flora <strong>of</strong> Victoria<br />

than any other family (Carr 1993).<br />

Invasion <strong>of</strong> native plant communities by exotic perennial <strong>grass</strong>es is listed as a key threatening process under the NSW<br />

Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995, based on the impact <strong>of</strong> five species, Hyparrhenia hirta, Cenchrus ciliaris, Eragrostic<br />

curvula, N. trichotoma and N. neesiana (NSW Scientific Committee 2003, Downey in Virtue et al. 2004). Perennial <strong>grass</strong>es are<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the major groups threatening biodiversity in NSW (Downey and Coutts-Smith 2006). N. neesiana, N. trichotoma and E.<br />

curvula are among the major species recognised as threats in temperate <strong>grass</strong>lands (Kirkpatrick et al. 1995, Groves 2004). More<br />

cautiously, Adair and Groves (1998 p. 9) suggested that N. neesiana invasion <strong>of</strong> temperate Themeda <strong>grass</strong>lands is “perhaps” an<br />

example <strong>of</strong> simple species displacement, causing no significant functional changes in the ecosystem.<br />

McArdle et al. (2004) investigated the impact <strong>of</strong> H. hirta by comparison <strong>of</strong> the botanical composition <strong>of</strong> matched invaded and<br />

uninvaded areas in Kwiambal National Park, northern NSW, and demonstrated reduced native plant richness and projective<br />

foliar cover in the ground strata <strong>of</strong> invaded areas. Exotic components <strong>of</strong> the system were not affected. The tendency <strong>of</strong> this plant<br />

to dominate was quantified, with infested sites being more homogeneous. Chejara et al. (2006) further investigated the impact on<br />

vascular plant diversity <strong>of</strong> this species on a travelling stock route near Manilla NSW. Where it was present it was the dominant<br />

species. Invaded areas had native plant species richness significantly reduced by half or more, as determined by spring and<br />

autumn surveys in 2003 and 2005, and native cover was significantly less in infested plots. A major fault with this study was that<br />

the areas lacking H. hirta had been spot sprayed with glyphosate to control the plant from 2001 to 2004. These plots were found<br />

to contain significantly greater numbers <strong>of</strong> exotic weed species in 2005. Another problem was that the invaded and uninvaded<br />

areas were 1 km apart and were “similar in respect to soil, landform, drainage and apparent disturbance history”, but there was<br />

no way to tell whether the vegetation prior to invasion had been similar (Chejara et al. 2006 p. 208)<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!