Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia
Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia
Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>of</strong> T. triandra are able to more effectively trap rainfall and reduce run<strong>of</strong>f than swards <strong>of</strong> C 3 <strong>grass</strong>es, so soil moisture from spring<br />
rainfall appears to be effectively preserved for later use (Dunin and Reyenga 1978, Dunin 1999, Singh et al. 2003). Grazing may<br />
have resulted to general dessication <strong>of</strong> the system: reduced rainfall infiltration due to soil compaction, general opening <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sward and destruction <strong>of</strong> deep rooted perennials with access to subsurface soil moisture.<br />
Currently most <strong>of</strong> the pasture legumes and some <strong>of</strong> the deliberately introduced <strong>grass</strong>es have poor persistence under livestock<br />
grazing, due in part to the prevailing high variability and extremes <strong>of</strong> climate, difficulty in managing grazing intensity, and to<br />
their near-monoculture nature (pastures with one <strong>grass</strong> + one legume, or just a single legume species, with volunteer broadleaf<br />
species) (e.g. Madin 1993) which makes them more prone to pest and disease attack. Continued increased nitrification by<br />
legumes has enabled invasion by nitrophilous species such as thistles, while continued use <strong>of</strong> superphosphate has resulted in<br />
widespread soil acidification (Moore 1993). These ‘improved’ pastures are unstable, requiring ongoing inputs or renovation<br />
(McIntyre and Lavorel 2007).<br />
McIntyre and Lavorel (2007) presented a unifying conceptual model <strong>of</strong> the states and the transition processes for the <strong>grass</strong>lands<br />
<strong>of</strong> south eastern <strong>Australia</strong> that exemplifies historical chain <strong>of</strong> developments (Fig. 5). Transitions from one state to another occur<br />
as a result <strong>of</strong> specific managment activity (or the lack <strong>of</strong> it). Invaded <strong>grass</strong>lands with moderate or high exotic components have<br />
been permanently altered (Mack 1989) and appear to represent new metastable states that do not revert to their former status<br />
(Sharp 1997). Native pasture may revert back to native <strong>grass</strong>land, but its properties and composition will have been more or less<br />
altered. McIntyre and Lavorel (2007) introduced the concept <strong>of</strong> “enriched <strong>grass</strong>land”, to include those areas no longer cultivated<br />
or managed for grazing, but which remain nutrient enriched. These are largely dominated by robust exotic perennial pasture<br />
<strong>grass</strong>es including Paspalum dilatatum, Dactylis glomerata and Phalaris aquatica, along with exotic rosette-forming herbs such<br />
as Plantago lanceolata and Hypochoeris radicata. Much <strong>of</strong> the enriched <strong>grass</strong>land is currently in shelterbelts and other areas <strong>of</strong><br />
recent tree and shrub planting (McIntyre and Lavorel 2007) although many former pastures on the edges <strong>of</strong> urban areas are in<br />
this state, and some disused pastures dominated by Nassella spp. can be included in this category. Little is known about the<br />
floristics, functioning and successional dynamics <strong>of</strong> enriched <strong>grass</strong>lands but they appears to be “an alternative stable state<br />
[requiring] a very high level <strong>of</strong> management to shift” (McIntyre and Lavorel 2007p. 15). Management inputs required include<br />
nutrient depletion, weed control (including the dominant <strong>grass</strong>es) and reintroduction <strong>of</strong> native species, particularly forbs. A<br />
similar set <strong>of</strong> problems is faced in extensification <strong>of</strong> former pastures to species rich <strong>grass</strong>land in Europe (Eschen et al. 2007).<br />
Figure 5. State and transition model for temperate <strong>grass</strong>y woodlands <strong>of</strong> south-eastern <strong>Australia</strong>. Each state is characterised by a<br />
level <strong>of</strong> livestock grazing, soil disturbance and soil fertility, straight arrows indicate mangagement factors associated with<br />
transitions between state and ciruclar arrows indicate management associated with maintenance <strong>of</strong> the state. Source: McIntyre<br />
and Lavorel 2007, p. 14.<br />
Fertilised and sown pastures are considered to be the most unstable states because <strong>of</strong> their ongoing requirements for inputs<br />
(McIntyre and Lavorel 2007). Removal <strong>of</strong> inputs results in transition to enriched <strong>grass</strong>land or to a native pasture. Transition from<br />
reference <strong>grass</strong>land to enriched <strong>grass</strong>land generally occurs accidentally through nutrient enrichment from fertiliser drift or water<br />
movement. Changes in composition and function <strong>of</strong> areas that have ‘regressed’ to native pasture are probable, but currently<br />
unknown.<br />
There are pronounced differences in scientific understanding <strong>of</strong> the states and processes. This reflects the historical agronomic<br />
approach to the study <strong>of</strong> agricultural land, and the use <strong>of</strong> floristic ecological techniques in natural <strong>grass</strong>lands. The overall<br />
floristics <strong>of</strong> sown pastures and <strong>of</strong> enriched <strong>grass</strong>land are very poorly known, while there is little data for native forbs in fertilised<br />
112