31.10.2014 Views

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 18. Conservation status <strong>of</strong> south eastern <strong>Australia</strong>n Synemon taxa. Status: CE = critically endangered, E = endangered, S =<br />

secure, V = vulnerable, X = extinct; Other symbols: – = not present. References: 1. Marriott 2003; 2. Douglas and Marriott 2003;<br />

3. Endersby and Koehler 2006; 4. O’Dwyer 1999; 5. Edwards 1994, 6. Sharp 1997; 7. O’Dwyer 2004; 8. Douglas 2003b; 9.<br />

Dept. <strong>of</strong> Sustainability and Environment 2009a.<br />

Species and form<br />

Status<br />

Aust<br />

Status<br />

ACT<br />

Status<br />

NSW<br />

Status SA<br />

Status<br />

Vic<br />

Habitat<br />

selene Klug – – E E/CE native perennial <strong>grass</strong>land y 1 2<br />

selene Klug pale morph – – E native perennial <strong>grass</strong>land y 1<br />

selene Klug dark morph – – E native perennial <strong>grass</strong>land y 1<br />

selene Klug Nhill morph – – CE native perennial <strong>grass</strong>land y 1<br />

selene Klug narrow-winged morph – – CE native perennial <strong>grass</strong>land y 1<br />

selene Klug Terrick Terrick morph – – E native perennial <strong>grass</strong>land y 1<br />

plana Walker CE E E X? T/E <strong>grass</strong>land y 1 3 4 5 6 7<br />

9<br />

nais Klug – – possibly<br />

widespread<br />

collecta Swinhoe (=? near collecta<br />

and sp. aff. collecta)<br />

T/E<br />

Belah/Callitris wodland and<br />

<strong>grass</strong>land; Walpeup,<br />

Sealake<br />

– prob S – CE open <strong>grass</strong>y woodland and<br />

<strong>grass</strong>land?; 1 site Vic:<br />

Shelley nr Corryong, many<br />

New England<br />

Grassland<br />

sp.?<br />

Refs.<br />

y 1 3 8 9<br />

y? 1 3 8<br />

theresa Doubleday – – E T/X <strong>grass</strong>y woodland?;<br />

n? 1 2 3 8 9<br />

Castlemaine, no extant<br />

populations know<br />

jcaria R. Felder – ? ? T/V woodland, mallee<br />

n 1 8<br />

heathland; Kiata, Big Desert<br />

parthenoides R. Felder S heathland n 1<br />

discalis Strand – – ? CE mallee, heathland. Big n 1 8<br />

Desert, Hattah<br />

undescribed sp. – V? – – 1 site Kosciusko National<br />

Park<br />

? 3<br />

Driscoll (1994) listed elucidation <strong>of</strong> the lifecycle and food plants as a research priority for S. plana. This remains to be achieved.<br />

Recent data (Braby and Dunford 2006) suggest it could be polyphagous on suitable Poaceae, or may be a narrow oligophage that<br />

has evolved new preferences. In grazed situations, eggs, larvae and perching adults <strong>of</strong> S. plana may selectively survive on or<br />

near tussocks <strong>of</strong> N. neesiana because they are taller and bulkier than Austrodanthonia tussocks, so are less liable to trampling<br />

damage, and because they are not grazed by livestock in the reproductive phase, which corresponds in time with flight and<br />

oviposition periods <strong>of</strong> the moth. Possibly increased survival rates <strong>of</strong> all life stages on N. neesiana under grazing and declining<br />

abundance <strong>of</strong> Austrodanthonia spp. may have combined to create selection pressure for host shifting. Any genetic change could<br />

persist more readily S. plana, with its very localised populations with restricted gene flow, than in more mobile insects. The<br />

several forms <strong>of</strong> S. selene suggest that S. plana may have adequate genetic variation on which selection could act. A similar host<br />

shift from native to exotic plant, demonstrated to be genetically based, occurred in the butterfly Euphydryas editha in pastures in<br />

Nevada USA. Larval survival was much greater on the alien plant (Cox 2004). Many other Lepidoptera species have adapted to<br />

use exotic plants (e.g. Shapiro 2002).<br />

In summary, the literature on S. plana contains many incorrect statements, assumptions taken to be facts etc. S. plana appears to<br />

be much more widespread, with less specific habitat requirements than previously assumed (Endersby and Koehler 2006). Larval<br />

feeding has never been observed and foodplant information is based on surmise.<br />

Morabine <strong>grass</strong>hoppers<br />

Morabinae (Orthoptera: Eumastacidae), known as matchstick <strong>grass</strong>hoppers (Rentz 1996), are a primitive, endemic <strong>Australia</strong>n<br />

subfamily <strong>of</strong> about 250-260 species and 40 genera, <strong>of</strong> extraordinary biological interest as subjects for studies <strong>of</strong> genetic drift,<br />

cytology, chromosomal polymorphism, karyotype evolution and parapatric speciation (Key 1973 1976 1978 1981, Rentz 1996).<br />

Key (1976) provided a bibliography <strong>of</strong> this literature. They are wingless, mostly very small, slender, fragile, inconspicuous<br />

<strong>grass</strong>hoppers resembling matchsticks, with subtle colouration, mainly active at night (Rentz 1996). External morphology within<br />

the subfamily shows very little variation except for male cerci (Key 1981). Morabinae had probably evolved by the Cretaceous,<br />

preceding the appearance <strong>of</strong> Poaceae and a few species are known to consume ferns, assumably a primitive character, although<br />

diversification in a number <strong>of</strong> groups is associated with widespread <strong>grass</strong> genera (Key 1976). Genitalia dissection <strong>of</strong> males or<br />

examination <strong>of</strong> the karyotype is the best means <strong>of</strong> identification (Key 1981, Rentz 1996). 39 chromosomal fusions due to<br />

translocations and 22 dissociations due to chromosome breakage have been identified in the subfamily, making most species<br />

chromosomally unique (Hartl and Clark 1989 presumably from White 1968 1968). Congeneric species and races <strong>of</strong> morabines<br />

frequently exhibit parapatric distributions with no obvious mechanisms <strong>of</strong> pre-mating isolation. Detailed studies have<br />

demonstrated the extreme difficulty <strong>of</strong> determining whether these populations consist <strong>of</strong> races or species and have resulted in<br />

reappraisal and clarification <strong>of</strong> these taxonomic concepts (Key 1981).The species and races appear to be able to mate freely but<br />

produce no viable <strong>of</strong>fspring, because <strong>of</strong> chromosomal incompatibility, so effectively “each population prevents the other from<br />

invading its territory by breeding with it” (Key 1981 p. 432).; or the <strong>of</strong>fspring have (<strong>of</strong>ten little) reduced fertility; or interbreed<br />

occurs despite radical chromosome differences (Key 1981).<br />

Many morabines live on trees or shrubs but some on <strong>grass</strong>es and forbs, and many are monophagous (Rentz 1996) and dependent<br />

on specific features <strong>of</strong> plants for shelter (Key 1978). Like other groups that exhibit parapatric speciation they have low vagility,<br />

160

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!