Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia
Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia
Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
affirmed the opinion <strong>of</strong> Longhi-Wagner and Zanin (1998) that N. neesiana is present in Paraguay, but cited a single specimen<br />
that Barkworth and Torres (2001) considered to be N. argentinensis (Speg.) Peñail. Furthermore, Barkworth and Torres (2001)<br />
did not list Brazil, Paraguay or Uruguay as part <strong>of</strong> the range <strong>of</strong> N. mucronata, so it appears likely that the entity Longhi-Wagner<br />
and Zanin (1998) treated as S. setigera and considered to be the same as N. neesiana was not the same entity as the S. setigera<br />
assigned to N. mucronata by Barkworth and Torres, but was equivalent to the N. neesiana <strong>of</strong> Barkworth and Torres. N.<br />
mucronata is not recorded from Brazil (Torres 1997, Barkworth and Torres 2001), but it remains unclear how Longhi-Wagner<br />
and Zanin (1998) treated extra-Brazilian literature records <strong>of</strong> S. setigera sens. lat. and whether they considered which <strong>of</strong> them<br />
were Nassella mucronata. Further complicating interpretation, Barkworth and Torres (2001) listed Portugal, Spain, France and<br />
Italy as countries to which N. mucronata had been introduced, but Verloove (2005) found that the name S. setigera had been<br />
misapplied to these European records, i.e. the specimens were misidentified, and were in fact N. neesiana, not N. mucronata, and<br />
that this probably also applied to Mexican S. setigera, which was also N. neesiana. Given this confusing situation, the entities<br />
actually present in Columbia, and Mexico, and perhaps Brazil appear to require clarification.<br />
Gardener et al. (1996b) stated that in South America as a whole N. neesiana had a latitudinal range <strong>of</strong> at least 22-51º S. Gardener<br />
(1998), corrected this to 26-40º, stating that the published record from Chile at 50º 53’ S by Soto (1984) was most likely a<br />
misidentification <strong>of</strong> Stipa brevipes Desvaux. However even the wider latitudinal range fails to cover either Ecuador or Peru, and<br />
excludes Bolivia except for a small area in the extreme south.The narrower range excludes all <strong>of</strong> Bolivia, most <strong>of</strong> Paraguay and<br />
indicates the absence <strong>of</strong> herbarium and literature records from most <strong>of</strong> southern Argentina. In southern South America it has a<br />
continuous distribution from near the coast <strong>of</strong> Chile, across the Andean zone and the pampas <strong>of</strong> Argentina through Uruguay to<br />
the Paranaense (south east Brazil) region (Longhi-Wagner and Zanin 1998, as Stipa setigera). In tropical and subtropical South<br />
America it occurs in highland enviroments (Martín Osorio et al. 2000) north along the Andes to Ecuador, to c. 1.5°N. Columbia<br />
and Venezuela are probably the only South American countries in which Stipa sens. lat. has been recorded (Columbia has 3 spp.<br />
and Venezuela 5: Longhi-Wagner and Zanin 1998) but in which S. neesiana has not. However its presence in the province <strong>of</strong><br />
Carchi <strong>of</strong> Ecuador suggests that it may well occur in south-western mountains <strong>of</strong> Columbia.<br />
In Argentina it is found in the following provinces - in the east (Misiones, Corrientes, Entre Ríos), the centro del pais (Buenos<br />
Aires, Córdoba, San Luis, La Pampa, Santa Fé), the west (Mendoza, San Juan), the north (Chaco, Formosa), the northwest<br />
(Jujuy) and the northeast (Catamarca, La Rioja, Salta and Tucumán) (Caro 1966, Gardener et al. 1996b, Torres 1997, Gardener<br />
1998). It is present in the Ventania land system in the south-west <strong>of</strong> Buenos Aires Province, north <strong>of</strong> Bahía Blanca (Amiotti et al.<br />
2007). Large populations are common in the central west around the Sierra de Córdoba (Sierras Pampeanas) (Anderson et al.<br />
2002), where the <strong>grass</strong>lands are at moderately high altitudes (Soriano et al. 1992). It is a common species in the pampas, a vast,<br />
humid, fertile plain stretching from the Rio de La Plata and the Atlantic coast west towards the Andes, occupying the provinces<br />
<strong>of</strong> Buenos Aires, parts <strong>of</strong> Entre Rios and southern Santa Fé, into western San Luis, northern La Pampa and southern Córdoba<br />
provinces (Soriano et al. 1992). In Santa Fe province it is a characteristic species <strong>of</strong> the Pampean phytogeographical province<br />
flechillar Stipeae community in Rosario County in the south <strong>of</strong> the province, and in San Cristóbal County in the central west <strong>of</strong><br />
the province is the dominant species <strong>of</strong> another flechillar <strong>grass</strong>land community <strong>of</strong> the Espinal phytogeographical province<br />
(Feldman et al. 2008). In Entre Ríos it was recorded by Zucol (1996) from Santo Ana, Dpto. Federación; Puerto Yerúa, Dpto.<br />
Concordia; Dpto. Villaguay; San José, Dpto. Depto. Colón; Colonia Elia, Dpto. Uruguay; Dpto. Gualeguay; and Camino a<br />
Puerto Unzué, Dpto. Gualeguaychú. It is not a dominant <strong>grass</strong> in the semiarid southern Caldén District near Gaviotas, west <strong>of</strong><br />
Bahía Blanca (Distel 2008), nor is it one <strong>of</strong> the major <strong>grass</strong>es in the whole Caldenal, a 10 million ha semi-arid region extending<br />
from the Atlantic coast south <strong>of</strong> Bahía Blanca north west to the Sierra de Córdoba, to the south and west <strong>of</strong> the Humid Pampa<br />
(Fernández et al. 2009). Martín Osorio et al. (2000) mention its presence in Patagonia (apparently citing Rivas Martínez) but<br />
other references to its presence there have not been found. In Uruguay it is common in pastures (Gardener et al. 1996b citing<br />
Rosengurtt et al. 1970) with records in the south, north-west and north-east (Gardener 1998) including Florida (Bowden and<br />
Senn 1962) and Montevideo (Barkworth et al. 2007). In Paraguay it was collected in 1989 at Chacoí in the far south <strong>of</strong> the<br />
province <strong>of</strong> Presidente Hayes, near the border with Central province, in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> Asuncion (Zanin 2008), east <strong>of</strong> Formosa<br />
province in Argentina. But it possibly occurs also in southern Paraguay, being known from close to the border in the states <strong>of</strong><br />
Misiones and Corrientes in Argentina (Gardener et al. 1996b, Gardener 1998). Temperate <strong>grass</strong>land is present in Paraguay only<br />
in small area <strong>of</strong> the far south-east (Overbeck and Pfadenhauer 2007) in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> Encarnacion, immediately to the northwest<br />
<strong>of</strong> Misiones. In Brazil it is found in the south (McLaren, Stajsic and Iaconis. 2004), in the states <strong>of</strong> Rio Grande do Sul and<br />
Santa Catarina, where it is the most common species <strong>of</strong> Stipa sens. lat. (Longhi-Wagner and Zanin 1998). In Uruguay and Brazil<br />
it is mostly found in the campos, a temperate subhumid <strong>grass</strong>land formation similar to the Argentine pampas, covering most <strong>of</strong><br />
Uruguay and the southern Rio Grande do Sul <strong>of</strong> Brazil (Soriano et al. 1992). In Brazil it is considered a characteristic species in<br />
the Pampa biome <strong>of</strong> the southern Rio Grande do Sul (Overbeck et al. 2007 – as “Stipa setigera C.Presl.”). It was not recorded<br />
from a humid subtropical <strong>grass</strong>land site in the Atlantic Forest biome on Morro Santana (30°03’S) by Overbeck et al. (2006). The<br />
most southerly distribution on the continent is in Chile, where it is found over a wide latitudinal range, at least from c. 26º 30’ to<br />
40º S (Gardener et al. 1996b, Gardener 1998). In continental Chile it is found in the Metropolitan Region (Santiago 33-34°S) and<br />
Regions IV (29-32°S), V (32-33°S), VIII-IX (35-39°S) and X (39-44°S ) (Baeza et al. 2007). It was collected at Concepcion<br />
(36°50’S) by Senn (Bowden and Senn 1962) and has been recorded on Robinson Crusoe Island (Más á Tierra) (33º 38’ S 76º 52’<br />
W) (Nelis 2006, Baeza et al. 2007) and Alejandro Selkirk Island (Más Afuera), in the Juan Fernández group, c. 650 km west <strong>of</strong><br />
mainland Chile, where it is considered to have been introduced (Baeza et al. 2007). It is known from Valparaíso (the types <strong>of</strong> S.<br />
longiflora) and near Santiago (the type <strong>of</strong> S. trachysperma) (Barkworth et al. 2007). In the northern part <strong>of</strong> its South American<br />
range its is found at high altitude. In Bolivia it is known from La Paz (Martín Osorio et al. 2000) and was collected at<br />
Cochabamba (17°26’S 66°10’W) by Senn (Bowden and Senn 1962). In Ecuador it is also native to the Andean region, at<br />
altitudes <strong>of</strong> 3000-3500 m in the Provinces <strong>of</strong> Carchi (c. 1.5° north <strong>of</strong> the equator near the Columbian border) and Canar (Clark et<br />
al. 1999-2008).<br />
The type <strong>of</strong> var. fernandeziana is from the Juan Fernández Islands <strong>of</strong> Chile (Barkworth et al. 2007). Vars. formicarioides,<br />
gracilior and virescens are endemic to Argentina, vars. hirsuta and longiaristata are recorded from Argentina and Uruguay, and<br />
var. neesiana is recorded from Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile and Uruguay (Zuloaga et al. 1994). Populations in north-eastern<br />
36