31.10.2014 Views

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

affirmed the opinion <strong>of</strong> Longhi-Wagner and Zanin (1998) that N. neesiana is present in Paraguay, but cited a single specimen<br />

that Barkworth and Torres (2001) considered to be N. argentinensis (Speg.) Peñail. Furthermore, Barkworth and Torres (2001)<br />

did not list Brazil, Paraguay or Uruguay as part <strong>of</strong> the range <strong>of</strong> N. mucronata, so it appears likely that the entity Longhi-Wagner<br />

and Zanin (1998) treated as S. setigera and considered to be the same as N. neesiana was not the same entity as the S. setigera<br />

assigned to N. mucronata by Barkworth and Torres, but was equivalent to the N. neesiana <strong>of</strong> Barkworth and Torres. N.<br />

mucronata is not recorded from Brazil (Torres 1997, Barkworth and Torres 2001), but it remains unclear how Longhi-Wagner<br />

and Zanin (1998) treated extra-Brazilian literature records <strong>of</strong> S. setigera sens. lat. and whether they considered which <strong>of</strong> them<br />

were Nassella mucronata. Further complicating interpretation, Barkworth and Torres (2001) listed Portugal, Spain, France and<br />

Italy as countries to which N. mucronata had been introduced, but Verloove (2005) found that the name S. setigera had been<br />

misapplied to these European records, i.e. the specimens were misidentified, and were in fact N. neesiana, not N. mucronata, and<br />

that this probably also applied to Mexican S. setigera, which was also N. neesiana. Given this confusing situation, the entities<br />

actually present in Columbia, and Mexico, and perhaps Brazil appear to require clarification.<br />

Gardener et al. (1996b) stated that in South America as a whole N. neesiana had a latitudinal range <strong>of</strong> at least 22-51º S. Gardener<br />

(1998), corrected this to 26-40º, stating that the published record from Chile at 50º 53’ S by Soto (1984) was most likely a<br />

misidentification <strong>of</strong> Stipa brevipes Desvaux. However even the wider latitudinal range fails to cover either Ecuador or Peru, and<br />

excludes Bolivia except for a small area in the extreme south.The narrower range excludes all <strong>of</strong> Bolivia, most <strong>of</strong> Paraguay and<br />

indicates the absence <strong>of</strong> herbarium and literature records from most <strong>of</strong> southern Argentina. In southern South America it has a<br />

continuous distribution from near the coast <strong>of</strong> Chile, across the Andean zone and the pampas <strong>of</strong> Argentina through Uruguay to<br />

the Paranaense (south east Brazil) region (Longhi-Wagner and Zanin 1998, as Stipa setigera). In tropical and subtropical South<br />

America it occurs in highland enviroments (Martín Osorio et al. 2000) north along the Andes to Ecuador, to c. 1.5°N. Columbia<br />

and Venezuela are probably the only South American countries in which Stipa sens. lat. has been recorded (Columbia has 3 spp.<br />

and Venezuela 5: Longhi-Wagner and Zanin 1998) but in which S. neesiana has not. However its presence in the province <strong>of</strong><br />

Carchi <strong>of</strong> Ecuador suggests that it may well occur in south-western mountains <strong>of</strong> Columbia.<br />

In Argentina it is found in the following provinces - in the east (Misiones, Corrientes, Entre Ríos), the centro del pais (Buenos<br />

Aires, Córdoba, San Luis, La Pampa, Santa Fé), the west (Mendoza, San Juan), the north (Chaco, Formosa), the northwest<br />

(Jujuy) and the northeast (Catamarca, La Rioja, Salta and Tucumán) (Caro 1966, Gardener et al. 1996b, Torres 1997, Gardener<br />

1998). It is present in the Ventania land system in the south-west <strong>of</strong> Buenos Aires Province, north <strong>of</strong> Bahía Blanca (Amiotti et al.<br />

2007). Large populations are common in the central west around the Sierra de Córdoba (Sierras Pampeanas) (Anderson et al.<br />

2002), where the <strong>grass</strong>lands are at moderately high altitudes (Soriano et al. 1992). It is a common species in the pampas, a vast,<br />

humid, fertile plain stretching from the Rio de La Plata and the Atlantic coast west towards the Andes, occupying the provinces<br />

<strong>of</strong> Buenos Aires, parts <strong>of</strong> Entre Rios and southern Santa Fé, into western San Luis, northern La Pampa and southern Córdoba<br />

provinces (Soriano et al. 1992). In Santa Fe province it is a characteristic species <strong>of</strong> the Pampean phytogeographical province<br />

flechillar Stipeae community in Rosario County in the south <strong>of</strong> the province, and in San Cristóbal County in the central west <strong>of</strong><br />

the province is the dominant species <strong>of</strong> another flechillar <strong>grass</strong>land community <strong>of</strong> the Espinal phytogeographical province<br />

(Feldman et al. 2008). In Entre Ríos it was recorded by Zucol (1996) from Santo Ana, Dpto. Federación; Puerto Yerúa, Dpto.<br />

Concordia; Dpto. Villaguay; San José, Dpto. Depto. Colón; Colonia Elia, Dpto. Uruguay; Dpto. Gualeguay; and Camino a<br />

Puerto Unzué, Dpto. Gualeguaychú. It is not a dominant <strong>grass</strong> in the semiarid southern Caldén District near Gaviotas, west <strong>of</strong><br />

Bahía Blanca (Distel 2008), nor is it one <strong>of</strong> the major <strong>grass</strong>es in the whole Caldenal, a 10 million ha semi-arid region extending<br />

from the Atlantic coast south <strong>of</strong> Bahía Blanca north west to the Sierra de Córdoba, to the south and west <strong>of</strong> the Humid Pampa<br />

(Fernández et al. 2009). Martín Osorio et al. (2000) mention its presence in Patagonia (apparently citing Rivas Martínez) but<br />

other references to its presence there have not been found. In Uruguay it is common in pastures (Gardener et al. 1996b citing<br />

Rosengurtt et al. 1970) with records in the south, north-west and north-east (Gardener 1998) including Florida (Bowden and<br />

Senn 1962) and Montevideo (Barkworth et al. 2007). In Paraguay it was collected in 1989 at Chacoí in the far south <strong>of</strong> the<br />

province <strong>of</strong> Presidente Hayes, near the border with Central province, in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> Asuncion (Zanin 2008), east <strong>of</strong> Formosa<br />

province in Argentina. But it possibly occurs also in southern Paraguay, being known from close to the border in the states <strong>of</strong><br />

Misiones and Corrientes in Argentina (Gardener et al. 1996b, Gardener 1998). Temperate <strong>grass</strong>land is present in Paraguay only<br />

in small area <strong>of</strong> the far south-east (Overbeck and Pfadenhauer 2007) in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> Encarnacion, immediately to the northwest<br />

<strong>of</strong> Misiones. In Brazil it is found in the south (McLaren, Stajsic and Iaconis. 2004), in the states <strong>of</strong> Rio Grande do Sul and<br />

Santa Catarina, where it is the most common species <strong>of</strong> Stipa sens. lat. (Longhi-Wagner and Zanin 1998). In Uruguay and Brazil<br />

it is mostly found in the campos, a temperate subhumid <strong>grass</strong>land formation similar to the Argentine pampas, covering most <strong>of</strong><br />

Uruguay and the southern Rio Grande do Sul <strong>of</strong> Brazil (Soriano et al. 1992). In Brazil it is considered a characteristic species in<br />

the Pampa biome <strong>of</strong> the southern Rio Grande do Sul (Overbeck et al. 2007 – as “Stipa setigera C.Presl.”). It was not recorded<br />

from a humid subtropical <strong>grass</strong>land site in the Atlantic Forest biome on Morro Santana (30°03’S) by Overbeck et al. (2006). The<br />

most southerly distribution on the continent is in Chile, where it is found over a wide latitudinal range, at least from c. 26º 30’ to<br />

40º S (Gardener et al. 1996b, Gardener 1998). In continental Chile it is found in the Metropolitan Region (Santiago 33-34°S) and<br />

Regions IV (29-32°S), V (32-33°S), VIII-IX (35-39°S) and X (39-44°S ) (Baeza et al. 2007). It was collected at Concepcion<br />

(36°50’S) by Senn (Bowden and Senn 1962) and has been recorded on Robinson Crusoe Island (Más á Tierra) (33º 38’ S 76º 52’<br />

W) (Nelis 2006, Baeza et al. 2007) and Alejandro Selkirk Island (Más Afuera), in the Juan Fernández group, c. 650 km west <strong>of</strong><br />

mainland Chile, where it is considered to have been introduced (Baeza et al. 2007). It is known from Valparaíso (the types <strong>of</strong> S.<br />

longiflora) and near Santiago (the type <strong>of</strong> S. trachysperma) (Barkworth et al. 2007). In the northern part <strong>of</strong> its South American<br />

range its is found at high altitude. In Bolivia it is known from La Paz (Martín Osorio et al. 2000) and was collected at<br />

Cochabamba (17°26’S 66°10’W) by Senn (Bowden and Senn 1962). In Ecuador it is also native to the Andean region, at<br />

altitudes <strong>of</strong> 3000-3500 m in the Provinces <strong>of</strong> Carchi (c. 1.5° north <strong>of</strong> the equator near the Columbian border) and Canar (Clark et<br />

al. 1999-2008).<br />

The type <strong>of</strong> var. fernandeziana is from the Juan Fernández Islands <strong>of</strong> Chile (Barkworth et al. 2007). Vars. formicarioides,<br />

gracilior and virescens are endemic to Argentina, vars. hirsuta and longiaristata are recorded from Argentina and Uruguay, and<br />

var. neesiana is recorded from Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile and Uruguay (Zuloaga et al. 1994). Populations in north-eastern<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!