31.10.2014 Views

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fire effects on weeds<br />

Moore (1993 p. 351) argued that Themeda <strong>grass</strong>lands remained “remarkably stable” under regimes <strong>of</strong> marsupial grazing and<br />

periodic burning, and if otherwise undisturbed were “not invaded by introduced species”. Fire results in temporary increases in<br />

nutrient availability and this fluctuation <strong>of</strong> resources may enhance invasion by exotic plants (Hobbs 1989). In general burning <strong>of</strong><br />

south-eastern <strong>Australia</strong>n native <strong>grass</strong>lands promotes post-fire colonising plants, most <strong>of</strong> which are exotic annuals that recruit<br />

from a large soil seed bank (Lunt 1990b, Lunt and Morgan 2002). However Stuwe and Parsons (1977) found a smaller<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> the vascular flora consisted <strong>of</strong> alien species at regularly burnt (railway) sites than in grazed or unmanaged T.<br />

triandra <strong>grass</strong>lands, while Dodd et al. (2007) found that sites burnt less frequently had higher exotic seed banks, and considered<br />

regular burning to be detrimental to the exotics. Burning <strong>of</strong> some degraded T. triandra <strong>grass</strong>lands has been reported to lead to<br />

major increases in cover and density <strong>of</strong> exotic annuals, which then slowly decline (Lunt 1990b 1990c, Morgan 1998d). Scarlett’s<br />

(1994) view was that regular burning <strong>of</strong> sites with a long history <strong>of</strong> grazing and trampling rarely has any major impact on exotic<br />

annuals, an effect he linked to the poor re-establishment <strong>of</strong> the cryptogam crust.<br />

Fire is <strong>of</strong>ten considered to provide advantages in reducing weed populations, but may promote or inhibit particular weed species<br />

or functional groups. Fire is demonstrably an effective tool to greatly reduce the cover <strong>of</strong> exotic invasive <strong>grass</strong>es when the<br />

invasives are not fire adapted, and to restore native plant cover (e.g. MacDougall and Turkington 2007). In temperate <strong>Australia</strong>n<br />

<strong>grass</strong>lands spring fires might reduce or prevent seed set in exotic annual <strong>grass</strong>es (Stuwe 1986) but late autumn burning promotes<br />

their regeneration along with Romulea rosea (L.) Eckl. (Iridaceae) (Lunt 1990c). Burning can reduce the density <strong>of</strong> the exotic<br />

<strong>grass</strong>es Briza maxima, Cynosurus echinatus L., Lolium rigidum Gaudin, L. perenne and Bromus hordeaceus in T. triandra<br />

<strong>grass</strong>lands but promotes a range <strong>of</strong> others including Aira and Vulpia spp. (Lunt 1990c, McDougall 1989, Adair 1995).<br />

As with the native plants, seasonality <strong>of</strong> the fire may determine the effect on particular exotics (see Morgan 1996), while the<br />

impacts on propagule production and seed bank levels are obviously important factors. According to Adair (1995) no clear<br />

evidence was then available that the season <strong>of</strong> burning has a significant effect on introduced <strong>grass</strong>es and forbs. Exotics are likely<br />

to be advantaged if they account for a high proportion <strong>of</strong> the soil seed bank, which is generally the case (Kirkpatrick et al. 1995,<br />

Morgan 1998c, Dodd et al. 2007). Robertson (1985) found similar densities <strong>of</strong> exotic annuals after autumn and spring burns at<br />

Gellibrand Hill. Stuwe (1994) among others argued that biomass-reduction burning now facilitates the growth <strong>of</strong> both native and<br />

exotic plants, while Lunt (1990b), based on seed bank studies at Derrimut, argued that burning is likely to promote exotics more,<br />

or at least as much as natives. Dodd et al. (2007) argued that exotic dominance <strong>of</strong> the seed bank is partly due to removal <strong>of</strong> fire,<br />

which along with exotic dominance in the surrounding landscape matrix, is likely to result in increased weediness <strong>of</strong> remnants.<br />

Decisions about the desirability <strong>of</strong> burning need to be based on an understanding <strong>of</strong> the contents <strong>of</strong> the soil seed bank and the<br />

phenology <strong>of</strong> the above ground cover at each site in order to predict whether a burn would be beneficial for the flora.<br />

Determining an appropriate fire regime even at a single small site can thus becomes prohibitively difficult. Most native<br />

<strong>grass</strong>lands contain a mix <strong>of</strong> weeds with different life strategies, so fire cannot be used as a general tool to favour the native<br />

species (Lunt 1990c).<br />

Stuwe (1994) warned that burning <strong>of</strong> areas with a N. neesiana seed bank should not be undertaken unless follow up herbicide<br />

treatment could be undertaken. However there appear to have been no studies on the specific effects <strong>of</strong> fire timing and intensity<br />

on N. neesiana populations in native <strong>grass</strong>lands. No information appears to be available about the comparable fuel loads <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>grass</strong>lands with and without N. neeesiana, so it is difficult to speculate about whether N. neesiana infestations increase or<br />

decrease the frequency and intensity <strong>of</strong> fires.<br />

In relation to vascular plants <strong>of</strong> native <strong>grass</strong>lands, there is a general consensus that the interaction between fire and grazing is the<br />

major factor involved in the abundance <strong>of</strong> most native species, including threatened taxa, and that low fire frequency is<br />

detrimental to most species (Scarlett and Parsons 1993). Frequent burning (a fire every 2-5 years) is necessary to maintain<br />

<strong>grass</strong>lands dominated by T. triandra, but other Victorian <strong>grass</strong>y ecosystems (E. camaldulensis and E. melliodora <strong>grass</strong>y<br />

woodlands in the Grampians and Sandplain Grassland in the Mallee) appear not to require burning to maintain their vascular<br />

plant diversity (Lunt 1991). In T. triandra <strong>grass</strong>lands, long intervals between fires results in loss <strong>of</strong> forb diversity (Stuwe and<br />

Parsons 1977, Lunt 1990c, Lunt and Morgan 1999). Morgan (1998c) found no correlation between seed bank species richness<br />

and fire history for five <strong>grass</strong>lands in the Victorian volcanic plains. However fires do not generally lead to significant seedling<br />

recruitment <strong>of</strong> native plants (Henderson 1999, Lunt and Morgan 2002), possibly because <strong>of</strong> severe depletion <strong>of</strong> the seed bank<br />

resulting from prior affects <strong>of</strong> long-term livestock grazing on seed production (Lunt 1990b 1990c). T. triandra is more sensitive<br />

to grazing shortly after fire (Groves and Whalley 2002).<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong> fire on animals<br />

Combinations <strong>of</strong> positive and negative effects <strong>of</strong> fire also occur with other organisms. Fire can change the abundance, range<br />

(spatial and temporal), fecundity and dietary choice <strong>of</strong> other organisms by altering the provision <strong>of</strong> food, shelter and habitat<br />

(Low 2002). Fire directly results in the elimination <strong>of</strong> many animal populations, although many sedentary species survive<br />

underground.<br />

According to Yen (1995 1999) the effects <strong>of</strong> fire on temperate <strong>Australia</strong>n <strong>grass</strong>land invertebrates were unknown, while Driscoll<br />

(1994) noted that they were ‘yet to be investigated’. Studies from other ecosystems tend to be equivocal, with few lessons for<br />

<strong>grass</strong>lands (Driscoll 1994). Edwards (1994) argued that fire <strong>of</strong>ten causes local extinction, but recolonisation from unburnt areas<br />

is usual, so in a situation where an invertebate is dependent on a community that is scarce and highly fragmented, recolonisation<br />

is <strong>of</strong>ten impossible. This appears to be the case with Synemon spp. (Edwards 1994) and with xanthorhoine moths (McQuillan<br />

1999), although with organisms like Synemon that spend a major part <strong>of</strong> their lifecycle underground, the precise timing <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fire with respect to the above-ground stages would appear to be critical.<br />

Removal <strong>of</strong> dense cover by fire and the creation <strong>of</strong> open ground will radically alter temperatures at the ground surface. Lunt<br />

(1995a) quantified temperature differences between the canopy surface in T. triandra <strong>grass</strong>land, the ground surface temperature<br />

and soil temperatures at 3 cm depth, in areas where the canopy was closed and in open gaps from July to April. The canopy<br />

provided excellent insulation with temperatures on the surface similar to those in the soil. Temperatures in gaps were generally<br />

123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!