31.10.2014 Views

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fossorial vertebrates are or were once a feature <strong>of</strong> the indigenous fauna <strong>of</strong> temperate <strong>grass</strong>lands worldwide. Darwin (1845 p. 51)<br />

reported that “considerable tracts” <strong>of</strong> <strong>grass</strong>land <strong>of</strong> the Maldonada region in Uruguay were undermined by the extensive shallow<br />

burrowing <strong>of</strong> the root-feeding Tucotuco Ctenomys brasiliensis Blainville (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae), while the commonest<br />

mammal in <strong>grass</strong>lands between the Rio Negro and Bahía Blanca in Argentina was the burrowing Agouti or Mara (Dolichotis<br />

patagonum Zimmerman) (as Cavia patagonica) (Caviidae). Another burrowing rodent, the Viscacha (or Plains Vizcacha)<br />

Lagostomus maximus (Desmarest) (Chinchillidae), larger than the Agouti, lives in large groups in the pampas between the<br />

Uruguay and Rio Rivers, makes deep, multi-chambered burrows with large soil mounds, known as viscacheras, and forages at<br />

night on <strong>grass</strong>es and herbs. It is considered a”key ecosystem engineer” whose grazing and burrowing activities change the<br />

structure and composition <strong>of</strong> the vegetation over extensive areas (Villarreal et al. 2008 p. 701). This speices remained abundant<br />

at least until the early 1970s (Soriano et al. 1992). Rheas were abundant in the <strong>grass</strong>lands <strong>of</strong> Bahía Blanca, and live on “roots and<br />

<strong>grass</strong>” (Darwin 1845 p. 89). Burrowing mammals have been implicated in significant changes in microtopography (soil mounds)<br />

in Argentina (Noble 1993). The effects <strong>of</strong> L. maximus activities cascade through the ecosystem, and include altered plant<br />

biomass distribution, nutrient cycling (primarily by deposition <strong>of</strong> faeces and urine in the burrow), nutrient content <strong>of</strong> plants and<br />

fire regimes (Villarreal et al. 2008).<br />

Other small mammals in the regions where N. neesiana is found include a group <strong>of</strong> Necromys mice (Rodentia: Cricetidae) <strong>of</strong><br />

open areas (D’Elía et al. 2008). N. lactens (Thomas) is found in high altitude <strong>grass</strong>lands (over 1500 m) in north-western<br />

Argentina and southern Bolivia including Catamarca, south Jujuy and Tucuman; N. obscurus onthe Atlantic coast <strong>of</strong> Uruguay<br />

and in areas around the La Plata River and N. lasiurus is very widely distributed including southern Buenos Aires Province<br />

(D’Elía et al. 2008). The oldest Necromys fossils are 3.5-4 million years old from southern Buenos Aires Province and the group<br />

probably radiated in the Pampean region during the late Pliocene (D’Elía et al. 2008).<br />

The biopedturbation activities <strong>of</strong> mammals now extinct or rare in temperate <strong>Australia</strong>n <strong>grass</strong>lands probably played a critical role<br />

in the maintenance <strong>of</strong> forb diversity (Reynolds 2006). The mechanisms include alteration to the spatial distribution and cycling<br />

<strong>of</strong> soil nutrients and water infiltration (Garkaklis et al. 2003). Bettongs, potoroos, bandicoots, bilbies and rodents are amongst the<br />

most important digging and burrowing groups (Garkaklis et al. 2003). Bilbies are powerful burrowers, prefering s<strong>of</strong>t soils such<br />

as sand dunes (Noble 1993). Reptiles, including goannas, may also be important, and the feral animal diggings, including those<br />

<strong>of</strong> rabbits, may function in a similar fashion to those <strong>of</strong> native vertabrates (James et al. 2009).<br />

Bettongia species probably mostly feed on underground fungi and may be opportunistically insectivorous and omnivorous<br />

(Seebeck and Rose 1989). They sometimes bury and store seed, “which are eaten later, <strong>of</strong>ten after germination” (Seebeck and<br />

Rose 1989 p. 721). The Rufous Bettong Aepyprymnus rufescens (Gray) is primarily rhizophagous buts eats fungi throughout the<br />

year (Seebeck and Rose 1989). Foraging activities <strong>of</strong> Bettongia penicllata Gray for hypogeous fungi commonly cover the ground<br />

with small diggings <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> different sizes and ages. In plan they are elliptial with a spoil heap at one end and a steep wall<br />

to a depth <strong>of</strong> 10-15 cm at the other. These excavations accumulate litter, leading to concentrations <strong>of</strong> buried fungal hyphae which<br />

become water repellent lenses in the soil after gradual infill <strong>of</strong> the excavations. The increased water infiltration in the<br />

excavations is the probable cause <strong>of</strong> decreased available nitrate and sulfur found in the soil <strong>of</strong> old, simulated diggings, while<br />

decreased ammonium may be due to rapid nitrification (Garkaklis et al. 2003).<br />

The Burrowing Bettong Bettongia lesueur is considered to be the most fossorial <strong>of</strong> the potoroids (Strahan) and constructed<br />

warrens up to 30 m in diameter that could contain over 100 entrances or were simple structures with only one or two entrances,<br />

the former sometimes associated with rock caps and the latter sometimes on plains (Noble 1993, Noble et al. 2007). It is “a<br />

powerful burrower ... capable <strong>of</strong> penetrating the underlying rock” (Noble 1993 p. 60) and its activities probably significantly<br />

promoted landscape heterogeneity and plant diversity (Noble et al. 2007). B. lesueur “may have helped maitain vast areas as<br />

<strong>grass</strong>land by eliminating shrubs” (Noble et al. 2007 p. 335).<br />

Among the native mammals still present in some temperate <strong>Australia</strong>n native <strong>grass</strong>lands, the biopedturbation activites <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Short-beaked Echidna may be the most significant. Much <strong>of</strong> the foraging activity <strong>of</strong> the Echidna requires digging to obtain<br />

invertebrates, and the animals shelter in temporary digs and prepared tunnels (Menkhorst 1995c). Nursery burrows are shallow<br />

and 1-1.5 m long (Menkhorst 1995c) while foraging disturbances range from nose-poke holes, through shallow scrapes to deep<br />

digs and extensive bulldozing (Eldridge and Mensinga 2007). In semi-arid woodlands with a <strong>grass</strong>y understorey this soil<br />

disturbance has been found to make a large contribution to landscape patchiness (Eldridge and Mensinga 2007). The foraging<br />

pits accumulated greater quantities <strong>of</strong> plant litter than undug areas, have moister and more porous soil, are cooler and have a<br />

different suite and greater abundance <strong>of</strong> soil micro-arthropods than the surface soil. Contrary to expectations, increased litter in<br />

pits did not result in increases in total or active C, total N and available P, although the N was probably largely immobilised in<br />

the litter. Ultimately, echidna pits probably influence plant germination and establishment (Eldridge and Mensinga 2007).<br />

The hip hole diggings <strong>of</strong> Macropus spp. are constructed so as to assist the animals to cool, and are generally located in the shade<br />

<strong>of</strong> trees or shrubs (Eldridge and Rath 2002), so may be <strong>of</strong> little significance in <strong>grass</strong>lands.<br />

Biopedturbation by invertebrates may be more important than that <strong>of</strong> vertebrates. Ants and earthworms are probably the most<br />

important groups. Ants are a prominent feature <strong>of</strong> temperate south-eastern <strong>Australia</strong>n <strong>grass</strong>lands. Many species construct surface<br />

mounds <strong>of</strong> excavated material around their nest entrances, associated with tunnels that may descend well under the surface.<br />

When the effects <strong>of</strong> their activity is quantified over the long term they can be viewed as ecological engineers whose activities<br />

restructure the landscape, generate heterogeneity, and affect soil structure and porosity, the distribution <strong>of</strong> soil nutrients and<br />

regeneration <strong>of</strong> the flora (Richards 2009). The vertical tunnels <strong>of</strong> Underground Grass Caterpillars Oncopera fasciculatus<br />

(Walker) (Hepialidae) reach a depth <strong>of</strong> up to 23 cm at maturity, depending on the ease with which the soil can be dug, and the<br />

excavated soil is deposited around the tunnel entrance and on the larval feeding runways (Madge 1954). Many other insects have<br />

larvae which live beneath the soil surface and contribute to biopedturbation. Earthworm activity in temperate <strong>Australia</strong>n<br />

<strong>grass</strong>lands can also be substantial. However there appear to be no published studies <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> bioturbation by invertebrates<br />

in temperate native <strong>grass</strong>lands.<br />

129

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!