31.10.2014 Views

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

palatability, digestibility and nutritional value, coincided with increases in ungulates with hypsodont characters, i.e. highcrowned,<br />

longer lasting teeth (Bouchenak-Khelladi et al. 2009).<br />

During the late Tertiary and the Pleistocene epoch <strong>of</strong> the Quaternary in <strong>Australia</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> herbivorous birds and<br />

mammals developed in association with the wide occurrence <strong>of</strong> <strong>grass</strong>land. These included the 2-3 tonne Diprotodon optatum,<br />

giant macropods Sthenurus, Procoptodon and Protemnodon, the small grazing diprotodon Palorchestes azael and open country<br />

flightless birds (Frith 1973, Hope 1994, Johnson 2009). But in all continents except Africa the open country megafauna largely<br />

became extinct during the late Pleistocene, and the grazing regimes were therefore completely changed, with major ecological<br />

repercussions (Johnson 2009). The <strong>Australia</strong>n herbivorous mammalian fauna was more severely affected than the Americas and<br />

Africa, losing almost all species over 100 kg in weight (Johnson 2009). Some 20 <strong>of</strong> the 50 <strong>Australia</strong>n species that disappeared<br />

were grazers, with Macropus spp. being the largest survivors (Jones 1999b). Loss <strong>of</strong> the megafauna due to aboriginal overkill, as<br />

argued by Flannery (1994) remains contentious, but the major role <strong>of</strong> hunting in the extinctions throughout the world now<br />

appears to be widely accepted (Johnson 2009). The extinctions appear to have occurred over a long period from 50-30 kybp for<br />

the larger species, through to c. 10 kybp for the smaller (Hope 1994). Kershaw et al. (2000) argued that people coexisted with<br />

the megafauna for many thousands <strong>of</strong> years, but conceded (pp. 502-503) that recent redating <strong>of</strong> significant fossil megafauna sites<br />

largely reduced the overlap, making it unlikely that climate or habitat change were to blame. Loss <strong>of</strong> the megafaunal grazers<br />

would have resulted in major change in the vegetation (Flannery 1994), particularly by reducing tree and shrub herbivory, as in<br />

African savannas (Hope 1994). Knowledge <strong>of</strong> megaherbivores indicate that they effectively acted as ecological engineers. Their<br />

extinction has likely led to the replacement <strong>of</strong> large areas <strong>of</strong> open vegetation with closed, woody formations, a decline in the<br />

heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> vegetation across a range <strong>of</strong> scales, increased fire, primarily due to increased fuel loads and possibly resulting in<br />

new areas <strong>of</strong> uniform <strong>grass</strong>land, and the decline <strong>of</strong> coevolved plants, including the species they dispersed or which had evolved<br />

defences against them (Johnson 2009).<br />

Grazing <strong>of</strong> sheep and cattle is now the major form <strong>of</strong> management in a large range <strong>of</strong> native <strong>grass</strong>lands, notably in the <strong>Australia</strong>n<br />

Capital Territory (ACT Government 2005) and in many privately owned native pastures (particularly in southern NSW), and is a<br />

substitute for burning to reduce the biomass <strong>of</strong> dominant <strong>grass</strong>es (Stuwe 1994). Moderate or more intense grazing pressure can<br />

be more effective than fire in maintaining bare ground and the low biomass <strong>of</strong> dominant <strong>grass</strong>es required to maintain high<br />

diversity <strong>of</strong> indigenous annuals and prostrate species, but disadvantages the taller, upright herbs (Kirkpatrick et al. 1995). Native<br />

pastures near Armidale NSW ungrazed for 16 years had a species richness <strong>of</strong> only 20 species per 30 m 2 because <strong>of</strong> large <strong>grass</strong><br />

tussocks, dense <strong>grass</strong> litter and little bare ground, while areas grazed continuously by sheep at moderate to low stocking rates<br />

were much shorter, with small tussocks, little litter and abundant small bare areas, and had a diversity <strong>of</strong> 36 species (Trémont<br />

and McIntyre 1994). Based on experimental results from disturbance treatments Sharp (1997) recommended retention <strong>of</strong><br />

livestock grazing as a management regime in the ACT, particularly at sites with high diversity <strong>of</strong> small intertussock forbs. Thus<br />

it appears that sites that have been managed by livestock grazing for long periods will degrade if grazing is removed, but can be<br />

managed without significant biodiversity loss by continuing the established grazing regime.<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> introduced livestock grazing on native <strong>grass</strong>lands are complex, being dependent, inter alia, on the grazer species,<br />

the intensity and duration <strong>of</strong> the grazing pressure, and interactions with other environmental and management factors<br />

(Kirkpatrick et al. 1995, Lunt 1995c, McIntyre et al. 1995, Aguiar 2005). Some <strong>of</strong> the most basic components <strong>of</strong> grazing impact<br />

in <strong>Australia</strong> have been poorly understood and await adequate investigation (Johnston et al. 1999). For instance conceptions <strong>of</strong><br />

what plants are important fodder have significantly changed historically. White (in the foreword in Leigh and Mulham 1965, p.<br />

v), commenting on the findings <strong>of</strong> pastoral research in the NSW Riverina, wrote that the pastoral research group had investigated<br />

“the question <strong>of</strong> which species are important at various seasons <strong>of</strong> the year. Often thirty or more species are available for<br />

selection and the extent to which the sheep exercises this opportunity is quite surprising. In many instances, in spite <strong>of</strong><br />

appearances, inconspicuous plants or rather unattractive shrubs are more important to sheep than was formerly believed”. Lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> understanding <strong>of</strong> appropriate grazing regimes for natural <strong>grass</strong>land management continued into the period when <strong>grass</strong>land<br />

preservation became a cause célèbre: “Currently it is not known if it is preferable to maintain a continuous, light grazing regime<br />

or to graze intermittently, either lightly or heavily ... avoiding peak flowering and seeding times for native plants ... It may be<br />

that particular sites require different regimes, on the basis <strong>of</strong> the different species mix present, type <strong>of</strong> exotic infestation, drainage<br />

or other factors” (Sharp and Shorthouse 1996).<br />

One effect that was believed to result in the deterioration <strong>of</strong> native <strong>grass</strong>land as a productive pasture was depletion <strong>of</strong> soil P<br />

through the harvest <strong>of</strong> livestock and from continual removal <strong>of</strong> wool (Wadham and Wood 1950). However Groves et al. (2003a)<br />

considered nutrient addition from continuous grazing to be a major factor in historical changes in <strong>grass</strong>land species composition,<br />

initially due to increased nutrient mobilisation through soil disturbance and death <strong>of</strong> native plants, and increased returns from<br />

faeces and urine, later through the addition <strong>of</strong> fertiliser and the sowing <strong>of</strong> legumes. Grazing adds highly labile mineral N direct to<br />

the soil, leads to higher average plant tissue N concentrations, decreased root: shoot ratios and sometimes less efficient N-uptake<br />

(Wedin 1999). Deposition <strong>of</strong> urine and faeces also alters the cycling rates <strong>of</strong> other nutrients. Nutrient enrichment and soil<br />

compaction associated with livestock camps in native <strong>grass</strong>lands favours weeds (Kirkpatrick et al. 1995).<br />

Mammalian herbivore grazing impacts on patterns <strong>of</strong> recruitment, production and mortality <strong>of</strong> grazed and ungrazed species, on<br />

plant resource use and on resource availability. The most direct effect is removal <strong>of</strong> and damage to the above-ground parts that<br />

are consumed or trampled (Kirkpatrick et al. 1995), but the effects on plants that are not eaten may be among the largest impacts.<br />

Interactions between defoliation and release from competition can result in complex changes in structure and composition<br />

(McIntyre et al. 1995). Grazing alters the composition <strong>of</strong> the community by differentially altering the population density, genetic<br />

composition and structure <strong>of</strong> the component plants (Aguiar 2005) and by creating bare patches suitable for colonisation<br />

(McIntyre et al. 1995). It may also affect the structural diversity at the community level, although this possibility has been<br />

widely ignored (Aguiar 2005). Status as a <strong>grass</strong>land may be dependent on grazers that differentially destroy juvenile trees and<br />

shrubs, preventing reversion to woodland or shrubland (Hobbs and Heunneke 1992). The accessibility <strong>of</strong> perennating buds to the<br />

grazing animals is an important determinant <strong>of</strong> survival, so suvival <strong>of</strong> hemicryptophytes (with buds close to ground level) tend to<br />

decline only when grazing is intense (McIntyre et al. 1995). One immediate structural effect is that green leaf material becomes<br />

more concentrated close to the soil surface (Soriano et al. 1992). Plants that avoid grazing because <strong>of</strong> their small size or height<br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!