31.10.2014 Views

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

pasture. The least understood transitions are those that may be classed as restoration: from developed pastures through enriched<br />

<strong>grass</strong>land back to native <strong>grass</strong>land (McIntyre and Lavorel 2007).<br />

McIntyre and Lavorel (2007) tabulated known and hypothesised leaf, broad morphology and regeneration traits <strong>of</strong> the <strong>grass</strong>es<br />

associated with each <strong>of</strong> the vegetation states. The traits considered were for leaves: specific leaf area, N content, dry matter<br />

content, toughness and life-span; for morphology: size, form, annual/perennial; and for regneration: seed size (large, medium or<br />

small), flowering period (early-late) and presence or absence <strong>of</strong> vegetative regeneration. European experience has demonstrated<br />

the utility <strong>of</strong> such simple biological modelling in predicting and managing transitions between states. The traits are poorly<br />

known for the <strong>Australia</strong>n <strong>grass</strong>es, but if found to be universally applicable they should enable prediction <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> land<br />

use change on ecosystem services.<br />

ACT Government (2005) provided a useful tabulation <strong>of</strong> the degree <strong>of</strong> disturbance corresponding with various levels <strong>of</strong> botanical<br />

significance in temperate <strong>grass</strong>lands <strong>of</strong> the ACT. Very low disturbance levels correspond with the highest botanical significance<br />

level. The ground layer includes the most sensitive species including orchids (Diuris spp. Caladenia spp., Thelymitra spp.) and<br />

lilies. Under low levels <strong>of</strong> disturbance the most sensitive species disappear but forbs such as Dichopogon spp., Bulbine bulbosa,<br />

Pimelea spp. and Wurmbea diocea survive, along with T. triandra. At moderate disturbance levels, sensitive species are rarely<br />

present, and the native herbs are generally disturbance tolerant, including Chrysocephalum apiculatum, Convolvulus erubescens,<br />

Plantago varia and Asperula conferta. High disturbance levels may contain a range <strong>of</strong> native <strong>grass</strong>es but T. trianda and most<br />

native forbs disappear. Very high disturbance sites are dominated by perennial exotic species or a low cover and diversity <strong>of</strong><br />

native species, mostly <strong>grass</strong>es. These categories have reasonable correspondence with the states in the McIntyre and Lavorel<br />

model. Vey low and low disturbance = reference <strong>grass</strong>land. Moderate disturbance = native pasture. High disturbance = possibly<br />

improved native pasture. Very high disturbance = enriched <strong>grass</strong>land.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the native <strong>grass</strong>lands <strong>of</strong> south-eastern <strong>Australia</strong> have been irreparably altered by pastoralism and agricultural<br />

intensification, but large areas have been destroyed by other developments including urbanisation (Sharp 1997). Much <strong>of</strong> the<br />

remaining native <strong>grass</strong>land and native pasture is currently managed by grazing <strong>of</strong> livestock. The ecological effects <strong>of</strong> grazing<br />

will next be examined in more detail.<br />

Mammal grazing<br />

“The countless herds <strong>of</strong> horses, cattle, and sheep, not only have altered the whole aspect <strong>of</strong> the vegetation, but they have almost<br />

banished the gunaco, deer, and ostrich.” Charles Darwin, The Voyage <strong>of</strong> the ‘Beagle’, 19 September 1833, on the Argentine<br />

pampas in the Buenos Aires region.<br />

The grazing <strong>of</strong> domestic livestock has been more important than any other exogenous disturbance in altering the composition<br />

and structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Australia</strong>n temperate <strong>grass</strong>lands (Trémont and McIntyre 1994). “Grazing has a detrimental impact on<br />

communities with little history <strong>of</strong> grazing, but is necessary to maintain communities with a long history <strong>of</strong> grazing” (van Andel<br />

and van den Bergh 1987 p. 11). Sheep and cattle grazing initially caused increases in plant diversity in south-eastern <strong>Australia</strong>,<br />

resulting from the decline <strong>of</strong> the dominant native <strong>grass</strong>es, and invasion by exotics and native species from adjacent drier<br />

communities (Moore 1993). But ultimately under the nearly geographically uniform regimes <strong>of</strong> continuous grazing at set<br />

stocking rates, vascular plant diversity declined across large areas (Moore 1993). The irregular occurrence <strong>of</strong> severe drought,<br />

combined with plagues <strong>of</strong> introduced grazers, particularly rabbits, led to to episodes <strong>of</strong> intense overgrazing which have severely<br />

altered the natural <strong>grass</strong>lands. Overgrazed areas largely became “synthetic communities” (Trémont 1994 p. 511), lacking most <strong>of</strong><br />

the orginal native plants and with a high proportion <strong>of</strong> exotic species.<br />

The long term detrimental effects <strong>of</strong> overgrazing by livestock on south-eastern <strong>Australia</strong>n temperate <strong>grass</strong>lands need to be kept<br />

in perspective. Grazing reduces the competitive effects <strong>of</strong> dominant species and creates open ground suitable for plant<br />

colonisation, so in general results in increased diversity <strong>of</strong> plant species and functional groups, with annuals particularly<br />

favoured (Trémont 1994, Trémont and McIntyre 1994, Lunt 1995c, Overbeck et al. 2007). Grazing at low intensities has<br />

maintained vascular plant diversity over large areas <strong>of</strong> so-called native pasture. Trémont (1994) compared native pastures<br />

intermittently grazed by sheep from the time <strong>of</strong> European tree clearing in the mid 1800s to 1976, and then either left ungrazed<br />

for 16 years or grazed at a stocking rate <strong>of</strong> 6.7 sheep ha -1 over the same period. Both areas were dominated by native <strong>grass</strong>es and<br />

most species present were native perennial forbs. The grazed treatment had a more open canopy, more bare ground, much greater<br />

species richness including small forbs and <strong>grass</strong>es and more common exotic annuals, whereas the ungrazed treatment had dense<br />

<strong>grass</strong> and litter cover, was species poor, but had a higher proportion <strong>of</strong> native perennials and more vegetatively reproducing forbs<br />

species. Dorrough et al. (2004) compared areas that were frequently grazed (native pastures), infrequently grazed (travelling<br />

stock reserves) and minimally grazed (roadsides) on the Monaro Plains and found that infrequently grazed areas had the highest<br />

native and exotic richness<br />

The maintenance <strong>of</strong> high plant diversity in many <strong>grass</strong>lands is dependent on continued grazing, but negative biodiversity<br />

impacts, particularly on native species, may occur if <strong>grass</strong>lands have a limited evolutionary history <strong>of</strong> grazing (Hobbs and<br />

Heunneke 1992). Any change in the grazing regime may constitute a disturbance, and the impact <strong>of</strong> the changes on diversity and<br />

invasive species depends on their nature in relation to the historical regime (Hobbs and Heunneke 1992). As cogently observed<br />

by Trémont and McIntyre (1994 p. 646), “the absence <strong>of</strong> grazing stock from <strong>grass</strong>y communities is as important, in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

community structure, diversity and composition, as its presence”.<br />

Large grazing mammals coevolved with <strong>grass</strong>lands in the Americas (Webb 1977 1978), Africa and Eurasia and probably<br />

<strong>Australia</strong> (Jones 1999b). According to Bouchenak-Khelladi et al. (2009 p. 2398) a “major and rapid radiation <strong>of</strong> vertebrate<br />

herbivores ... occurred between 20 and 10 million years ago ... along with a near simultaneous rise to ecological dominance <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>grass</strong>es ... suggesting that <strong>grass</strong>es coevolved tightly with vertebrate herbivores”. Occupation <strong>of</strong> C 4 -dominated <strong>grass</strong>lands by<br />

ungulates is inferred to have commenced c. 26 mybp, with occupation by Bovideae and Cervideae occurring in the early to late<br />

Miocene (23-5 mybp). Significant increases in silica density in C4 lineages, believed to be anti-herbivore defences that decrease<br />

113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!