31.10.2014 Views

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

esult in a “short-term flush” <strong>of</strong> N mineralisation in the soil, and suggested that T. triandra is uniquely able to take advantage <strong>of</strong><br />

this resource.<br />

The critical factor for survival and resprouting <strong>of</strong> vascular plants <strong>of</strong> frequently burned <strong>grass</strong>lands is the degree to which buds are<br />

protected from fire damage (Overbeck and Pfadenhauer 2007). In general in temperate south-eastern <strong>Australia</strong>n <strong>grass</strong>lands fire<br />

promotes vigorous resprouting by native perennials, but generally very little perennial seedling recruitment: fire enhances the<br />

vigour and flowering <strong>of</strong> many perennial herbs but results in little change in plant species composition (Lunt and Morgan 2002).<br />

However buring can lead to major increase in the abundance <strong>of</strong> annual exotic species on long-unburnt sites (Lunt 1990c). T.<br />

triandra <strong>grass</strong>land fires are relatively cool, and when occurring in summer and early autumn have little negative effect on the<br />

flora, which survives with maximal underground carbohydrate storage, buried buds and buried seed, although seeds on the soil<br />

surface are destroyed (Lunt and Morgan 2002). The majority <strong>of</strong> intact T. triandra <strong>grass</strong>lands on the Victorian volcanic plains are<br />

burnt at intervals <strong>of</strong> 1-5 years (Morgan 1998d) a frequency recommended by McDougall (1989). Healthy T. triandra swards are<br />

usually maintained with fires at this frequency and no grazing (Lunt and Morgan 2000). The time <strong>of</strong> burning (late summer or<br />

autumn) is probably not critical for the health <strong>of</strong> T. triandra populations, but fire greatly reduces the amount <strong>of</strong> T. triandra seed<br />

produced in the following autumn (McDougall 1989). Reduced fecundity in the short term is compensated for by increased plant<br />

surival and vigour. Morgan (1997) predicted that reducing the fire frequency from 1-2 years to 5 or more years would<br />

substantially alter the dynamics <strong>of</strong> the population if seedling recruitment was reduced and established plants were incapable <strong>of</strong><br />

adjusting.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> our knowledge relates to the <strong>grass</strong>lands in which T. triandra is dominant and highly productive, systems that naturally<br />

promote fire. Much less is known about fire effects in <strong>grass</strong>lands not dominated by T. triandra. Poa spp. “appear to be able to<br />

maintain their dominance without disturbance by burning or other forms <strong>of</strong> biomass removal” while Austrodanthonia and<br />

Austrostipa <strong>grass</strong>lands accumulate little biomass and are not thought to need regular biomass reduction to maintain plant<br />

diversity (Lunt and Morgan 2002 p. 183). Little seems to be known about fire effects in the Riverine Plains <strong>grass</strong>lands.<br />

Themeda triandra biomass accumulation and senescence dieback<br />

The dependence <strong>of</strong> T. triandra <strong>grass</strong>lands on fire is almost universally recognised, despite the very limited understanding <strong>of</strong> their<br />

evolutionary origin and palaeoecology, particularly in relation to ancient grazing regimes. They appear to be similar to temperate<br />

fire-adapted <strong>grass</strong>lands with C 4 dominants worldwide, where the C 4 species promote their own dominance by building high<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> biomass and thus promoting fire. T. triandra stands that are not burnt, or otherwise biomass-reduced, gradually develop<br />

massive quantities <strong>of</strong> dead leaves and litter, and failure to remove this biomass can cause tiller and plant senescence, attributed to<br />

“self-shading” (Lunt and Morgan 2000). Major T. triandra mortality occurred at Derrimut and Laverton North <strong>grass</strong>lands when<br />

fire frequency exceeded 5 y, and when fire was finally used, plant and tiller densities were much lower than in regularly burnt<br />

<strong>grass</strong>land (Morgan and Lunt 1999, Lunt and Morgan 1999a 1999c). Mass dieback <strong>of</strong> T. triandra resulting from the absence <strong>of</strong><br />

fire or other biomass reduction has been described as “<strong>grass</strong>land collapse” (C. Hocking pers. comm.).<br />

According to Lunt and Morgan (1998a p.70) “the <strong>grass</strong>land becomes increasingly choked up with dead <strong>grass</strong> material, above<br />

which the tussocks form a thin mantle <strong>of</strong> new, green growth”, and eventually living tillers can “no longer poke up through the<br />

dead <strong>grass</strong> to reach the sunlight, causing the tussocks to die”. Supposedly, there is “insufficient light penetrating through the<br />

canopy <strong>of</strong> old foliage to the young tillers to enable them to photosynthesise sufficient energy” (Lunt et al. 1998). T. triandra<br />

<strong>grass</strong>land not burnt for greater than 6 years is now thought to senesce in this way (Morgan and Lunt 1999, Lunt and Morgan<br />

2002), rather than reach a steady state (Lunt and Morgan 2002). Low soil fertility and moisture levels may sometimes prevent<br />

such senescence (Kirkpatrick et al. 1995), so on less productive sites T. triandra senescence requires considerably longer periods<br />

or may never occur. O’Shea (2005 p. 161) stated that on productive sites, the phenomenon requires 10-11 years: “the canopy<br />

collapses upon itself and forms a thick layer <strong>of</strong> dead thatch over the soil surface, allowing only minimal seedling recruitment and<br />

preventing new tiller initiation”. According to Muyt (2005 p. 3), the dense T. triandra thatch “undermines the growth <strong>of</strong> [the<br />

<strong>grass</strong>] itself; plants become increasingly brittle and subject to collapse”. After burning T. triandra usually regains high cover<br />

quickly, returning to pre-fire biomass levels in 2-4 years (Morgan 1994, McDougall and Morgan 2005) and can form a complete<br />

dense canopy in as little as 3 years. Death <strong>of</strong> the dominant <strong>grass</strong> results in a major nutrient pulse in the soil, resulting primarily<br />

from decay <strong>of</strong> T. triandra crowns and roots, and this enables invasion by exotic plants (Wijesuriya 1999, Wijesuriya and<br />

Hocking 1999). Weedy exotics are now generally pervasive in these systems, so what would happen in the absence <strong>of</strong> exotic<br />

seed sources after T. triandra die-<strong>of</strong>f is not clear.<br />

The senescence dieback phenomenon has been widely reported worldwide for other dominant temperate and subtropical C 4<br />

tussock <strong>grass</strong>es adpated to fire (Bond et al. 2008). Although <strong>of</strong>ten described under different rubricks (e.g “detritus accumulation”<br />

– Knapp and Seastedt 1986) the effect is the same: accumulation <strong>of</strong> standing dead litter shades out and kills the shade-intolerant<br />

new tillers (Knapp and Seastedt 1986; Everson et al. 1988, Uys et al. 2004). Fire frequency is thus one <strong>of</strong> the most important<br />

determinants <strong>of</strong> the <strong>grass</strong> species composition in C 4 <strong>grass</strong>lands: “fire-dependent <strong>grass</strong> species, typically members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Andropogoneae ... are fire-dependent in the sense that they decrease in, or disappear from, a sward in the absence <strong>of</strong> frequent<br />

burning” (Bond et al. 2008 p. 1747). Lunt and Morgan (1999a) reported a 70% decrease in T. triandra tussock density and a<br />

58% decrease in live tiller density in rarely burnt areas. Similar changes are indicated by Uys et al. (2004) who found that the<br />

cover <strong>of</strong> T. triandra in a mesic (735 mm per annum) South African <strong>grass</strong>land decreased from c. 70% when annually burnt to <<br />

5% after fire exclusion for 4 or more years, and the plant effectively disappeared from mesic and montane sites that were<br />

unburnt..<br />

In southern Brazilian mixed C 3 and C 4 tussock <strong>grass</strong>lands dominated by C 4 <strong>grass</strong>es, Overbeck and Pfadenhauer (2007 p. 35)<br />

observed that “without periodic removal <strong>of</strong> biomass ... shading by dead [<strong>grass</strong>] biomass inhibits survival and tillering and higher<br />

humidity under the litter may cause death and decay <strong>of</strong> underground plant parts within a few years”. Post-fire effects that<br />

increase the vigour <strong>of</strong> tussocks have been recorded for a number <strong>of</strong> dominant species in other parts <strong>of</strong> the world, including<br />

increased photosynthetic activity, growth rates and sexual reproduction (Overbeck and Pfadenhauer 2007).<br />

The T. triandra senescence phenomenon may be compared with ‘normal’ <strong>grass</strong> senescence, which occurs in all Poaceae in<br />

response to drought (Norton et al. 2008) and is a mechanism to reduce plant mortality from water stress, by the gradual<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!