31.10.2014 Views

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Glyceria maxima (Hartman) Holmb and Brachiaria mutica (Forrskal) Stapf convert shallow water aquatic systems to wet<br />

<strong>grass</strong>land (Panetta and Lane 1996). <strong>Weeds</strong> that convert one ecosystem to another, changing its major functional characteristics<br />

have been termed transformers (see above) and are usually ‘canopy dominants’ (Panetta and Lane 1996).<br />

Most invasive plants are not transformer species but are are functional analogues <strong>of</strong> native species in the invaded systems. Few<br />

invasive <strong>grass</strong>es have the potential to change a <strong>grass</strong>land into any other ecosystem, but they frequently appear to simplify the<br />

system by reducing species richness and becoming dominant. For instance Hyparrhenia hirta was found to dominate areas it<br />

occupied, which also had reduced native plant species richness (McArdle et al. 2004).<br />

Weed invasion “can affect invertebrates adversely by elimination <strong>of</strong> native plant species, habitat alteration and ... the spread <strong>of</strong><br />

exotic invertebrates” (Yen 1999 p. 63).<br />

Physical structure and chemistry<br />

Alterations to the biotic structure and composition <strong>of</strong> a community by an invasive plant affects the spatial and temporal patterns<br />

<strong>of</strong> resource flow within that community (Grice 2006). Altered soil chemistry can result from allelopathy, pH changes or changes<br />

in the availability <strong>of</strong> minerals, particularly major nutrients and salts (Woods 1997, Levine et al. 2003).<br />

Legumes (Fabaceae, Caesalpineaceae, Mimosaceae) such as Lupinus arboreus Sims, may increase soil N levels (Adair and<br />

Groves 1998) and have a direct effect on soil fertility. On young volcanic soils in Hawaii, the invasive tree Morella faya (Aiton)<br />

Wilbur (Myricaceae) and its microbial symbionts increased soil N fixation to levels 90 times that <strong>of</strong> all native plants combined<br />

and increased the rates <strong>of</strong> N mineralisation, which created a cascade effect through the system and altered its subsequent<br />

development (Vitousek et al. 1987, Vitousek and Walker 1989). Bacterial symbionts in Sorghum halepense enable it to invade<br />

N-poor soils, partly explain its ability to form dense near-monocultures that exclude other plants, and are largely responsible for<br />

its ability to significantly alter soil biogeochemistry (Rout and Chrzanowski 2009).<br />

Other plants can deposit salt on the surface, e.g. Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L. (Aizoaceae) (Woods 1997). In Argentine<br />

<strong>grass</strong>lands Pinus spp. alter the pH and other properties <strong>of</strong> soils to the detriment <strong>of</strong> some native <strong>grass</strong>es (Amiotti et al. 2007).<br />

Alterations to the soil chemistry in turn commonly result in alteration to nutrient cycles.<br />

Many weeds were introduced to combat soil erosion. Chrysanthemoides monilifera was widely planted and became a major<br />

weed because it is an efficient sand binder (Groves 2004). McIlroy et al. (1938) advocated the use <strong>of</strong> three now severely invasive<br />

<strong>grass</strong>es Paspalum dilatatum, Pennisetum clandestinum Hochst. ex Chiov. and Cynodon dactylon L. for erosion control in<br />

Victoria.<br />

The many physical, chemical and biotic effects <strong>of</strong> the production and deposition <strong>of</strong> litter by invasive plants can impact markedly<br />

on biodiversity. Presence <strong>of</strong> litter can reduce seedling establishment (Lenz et al. 2003). Litter alters the microclimate, surface<br />

conditions and soil properties including temperature, water infiltration, retention and evaporation, and may produce chemical<br />

leachates. These changes in turn can modify competitive interactions between organisms, alter rates <strong>of</strong> seed and seedling<br />

predation, favour proliferation <strong>of</strong> fungal pathogens, etc. (Lenz et al. 2003). Avena litter at 400 g m -2 was found to significantly<br />

reduce maximum soil temperature (by c. 3ºC in early November) but not minimum temperature or soil moisture (Lenz et al.<br />

2003). Ens (2002a) found that dense litter mats produced by N.neesiana altered the species composition and activity levels <strong>of</strong><br />

invertebrate communities with flow-on effects through the system. Dense <strong>grass</strong> litter in <strong>grass</strong>lands generally results in reduced<br />

plant biodiversity (Lenz et al. 2003). Buildup <strong>of</strong> perennial native <strong>grass</strong> litter in the higher productivity temperate south-eastern<br />

<strong>Australia</strong>n <strong>grass</strong>lands, paticularly T. triandra <strong>grass</strong>lands, has the same effect, so regular biomass reduction through fire, grazing<br />

or other management is necessary to maintain vascular plant diversity (Stuwe and Parsons 1977, McIntyre 1993, Morgan 1997,<br />

Henderson 1999, Lunt and Morgan 2002). For example Morgan (1995a 1995b) found that seedling establishment <strong>of</strong> Rutidosis<br />

leptorrhynchoides in dense T. triandra <strong>grass</strong>land required large canopy gaps, mortality <strong>of</strong> young seedlings in smaller gaps being<br />

due to shading and increased herbivory. In contrast, litter experiments in Dry Themeda <strong>grass</strong>lands in the ACT by Sharp (1997)<br />

found that retention <strong>of</strong> the T. triandra litter resulted in higher native forb richness and cover than when litter was removed, with<br />

the opposite effect for exotic forbs. The effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>grass</strong> accumulation on plant productivity differs seasonally and from site to<br />

site and species to species (Lenz et al. 2003). Generally plants with smaller seeds are inhibited more by litter because the<br />

germinants have inadequate energy reserves (Lenz et al. 2003). Annuals are thus more likely to be negatively impacted.<br />

In pot experiments using soils from native <strong>grass</strong>land in South <strong>Australia</strong> Lenz et al. (2003) found that Avena arbata litter at<br />

different densities had complex, time-dependent effects on the emergence and biomass <strong>of</strong> seedlings, that varied between taxa.<br />

The establishment or growth <strong>of</strong> some exotic dicots was reduced by dense litter, but after 4 months the biomass <strong>of</strong> annual <strong>grass</strong>es<br />

was positively affected , and total biomass fell markedly in the dense litter treatment, mainly due to suppression <strong>of</strong> Trifolium<br />

spp.. Medium and high litter levels had little effect on the only native plants that emerged in sufficient numbers to assess,<br />

Austrodanthonia spp., but after 4 months all had died due to fungal disease. Field experiments, in which all standing biomass<br />

was removed and dry Avena litter added, demonstrated similar complex effects. In winter, c. 4 months after treatment, growth <strong>of</strong><br />

annual <strong>grass</strong>es was increased by dense litter and there were significant suppressive effects on Austrodanthonia spp., and some<br />

exotic herbs, but no effect on Austrostipa eremophila (Reader) S.W.L. Jacobs and J. Everett. After c. 9 months, the biomass <strong>of</strong><br />

exotic annual <strong>grass</strong>es was slightly increased by high litter levels, there was no siginficant effect on native perennial <strong>grass</strong>es, but<br />

the biomass <strong>of</strong> all other species combined (mostly exotic forbs) was significantly decreased.<br />

Invasive plants can severely modify hydrological cycles (Vidler 2004). Tamarix in inland <strong>Australia</strong> lowers the water table, alters<br />

stream flow and flooding regimes and ultimately salinity levels (Griffen et al. 1989). Andropogon virginicus L., develops a high<br />

biomass <strong>of</strong> dead shoots that reduce evaporation rates from the soil and also passes through an inactive senescent phase during<br />

which transpiration is reduced (Mueller Dombois 1973). In rainforest communities this results in excess water in the soil,<br />

increased run<strong>of</strong>f and accelerated erosion.<br />

Altered microclimates (Vidler 2004) are probably commonplace, particularly through increased shading.<br />

Alterations to animal health, habitat, food chains and community trophic structure<br />

Invasive plants frequently have impacts on consumers and decomposers, including their community composition, diversity and<br />

behaviour (Levine et al. 2003). The impacts <strong>of</strong> invasive plants on fauna are more complex than on plants, and can be positive or<br />

86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!