31.10.2014 Views

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

species tend to be those which transform the system invaded by rapidly modifying the prevailing disturbance regime (Richardson<br />

and van Wilgen 2004). Transformer species <strong>of</strong>ten have disproportionately large effects compared to other weeds because they<br />

become numerically dominant in the invaded area or dominate the biomass. Good examples <strong>of</strong> transformer species are Mimosa<br />

pigra L. in Melaleuca woodlands in northern <strong>Australia</strong> (Braithwaite et al. 1989), Tradescantia in New Zealand forests (Kelly<br />

and Skipworth 1984) and Pinus and Acacia species in South Africa (Versfeld and van Wilgen 1986). Transformer <strong>grass</strong>es<br />

include ‘land builders’ such as Spartina (Gray et al. 1997), and Andropogon gayanus (Kunth) in northern <strong>Australia</strong>, which has<br />

massive stature in comparison to native <strong>grass</strong>es and greatly enhances the intensity and frequency <strong>of</strong> fires (Rossiter et al. 2003,<br />

Ferdinands et al. 2006).<br />

<strong>Impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> N. neesiana<br />

N. neesiana does not neatly fit the definition <strong>of</strong> transformer species in <strong>Australia</strong>n native <strong>grass</strong>lands. It dominates the canopy in<br />

many invaded native <strong>grass</strong>lands, although its morphology, biomass and phenology is similar to some <strong>of</strong> the major native <strong>grass</strong>es<br />

that it replaces. The invaded systems remain as <strong>grass</strong>lands, and other effects it may cause are poorly known.<br />

The biodiversity impacts <strong>of</strong> N. neesiana in temperate <strong>Australia</strong>n natural <strong>grass</strong>lands is probably critically determined by its<br />

presence and impact in the cultural steppe that surrounds and fragments the remaining indigenous remnants. The success <strong>of</strong> N.<br />

neesiana in the cultural steppe drives propagule pressure, so determines, in part, the susceptibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>grass</strong>land remnants to<br />

invasion. Their invasibility is also strong influenced by their health or degradation state, which is critically influenced by<br />

management. The prevalence <strong>of</strong> major anthropogenic disturbance and the disruption <strong>of</strong> ‘natural’ disturbance patterns appear to<br />

be central issues. A range <strong>of</strong> other factors most likely contribute to the success <strong>of</strong> N. neesiana in native <strong>grass</strong>lands and its<br />

biodiversity impact, including release from natural enemies.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!