31.10.2014 Views

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Storrie and Lowien 2003). However under Victorian legislation governing pesticide use these permits did not legalise use: <strong>of</strong>flabel<br />

use, with certain provisions, not being illegal.<br />

Label registration for all Nassella species was finally achieved for a flupropanate product in 2004 (McLaren et al. 2005). Label<br />

recommendations were for application to actively growing plants, by boom or spot spraying, once per year, in urban open space,<br />

woodlands, roadsides, nature reserves and pastures. Other products with on-label uses soon followed. As <strong>of</strong> October 2007 the<br />

only other herbicide with specific label recommendatons for N. neesiana was glyphosate, registered only for spot spraying,<br />

although a number <strong>of</strong> minor use permits were in operation (Snell et al. 2007).<br />

Glyphosate<br />

Glyphosate prevents synthesis <strong>of</strong> essential aromatic amino acids. It is probably the world’s most widely used herbicide. It is a<br />

non-selective, systemic, water soluble herbicide, absorbed by foliage, rapidly translocated throughout the plant and non-residual,<br />

being inactivated on contact with soil (Tom.lin 1997). It has relatively rapid activity, kills all plants, and creates bare ground, so<br />

when there is a soil seed bank <strong>of</strong> N. neesiana the plant quickly re-establishes (Liebert 1996). Pritchard (2002) found it gave<br />

excellent initial control, preventing seed formation when applied at the boot stage, but that 10 months after application many<br />

tussocks showed new growth.<br />

Off-target damage from glyphosate can be high, but depends on the selectivity <strong>of</strong> the application method. There is no<br />

withholding period for livestock grazing or other agricultural activity although stock grazing should not be undertaken for 7 days<br />

after application (Snell et al. 2007)..<br />

Flupropanate<br />

Flupropanate (flupropanate-sodium, formerly called tetrapion) is an halogenated (fluorine) alkanoic acid which functions as an<br />

inhibitor <strong>of</strong> fat sysnthesis. It is a water soluble, systemic herbicide with low contact activity, taken up mainly by roots, and used<br />

only for control <strong>of</strong> perennial and annual <strong>grass</strong>es in pastures and uncultivated areas (Tomlin 1997). It is moderately selective and<br />

slow acting, with soil residual effects that kill emerging seedlings (Parsons and Cuthbertson 1992, McLaren et al. 2005).<br />

Recommended rates for control <strong>of</strong> mature N. neesiana are 1.5-3 L ha -1 (Grech et al. 2009a). Effects on target plants may be<br />

noticeable after 3-5 months but it may take upt to 12 months for plants to die (Snell et al. 2007). Pritchard (2002) found only<br />

slight foliage death 15 weeks after treatment but recorded 92-95% kill <strong>of</strong> tussocks after 45 weeks. The residual effects are<br />

increased at higher application rates and their duration is dependent on rainfall, which leaches the herbicide from the soil<br />

(Michelmore 2003). Fluporanate activity and behaviour is dependent on soil type – higher rates are used on fertile basalt soils<br />

and in higher rainfall areas, lower rates on infertile soils derived from sedimentary and granitic rocks and in lower rainfall areas<br />

(Snell et al. 2007). Flupropanate provides some selectivity: Austrodanthonia, Austrostipa spp. and Microlaena are killed,<br />

especially at higher applications rates, while T. triandra, Bothriochloa macra and Poa labillardieri Steud. are generally tolerant<br />

at label rates. Phalaris aquatica L., Dactylis glomerata L. and Festuca arundinacea are affected but recover, while young<br />

Trifolium subterraneum L. are severely affected (Michelmore 2003). In <strong>Australia</strong>, a withholding period for grazing stock or<br />

cutting for stock food <strong>of</strong> 4 months minimum after blanket application is mandatory, and 14 days for spot application, along with<br />

some other restrictive provisions for production agriculture (McLaren et al. 2005).<br />

Flupropanate has been the preferred herbicide for spot spraying in agricultural areas and on land lacking significant native cover<br />

(Liebert 1996). An infestation in Geelong, originally with 80% cover, was reduced to 10% cover after spraying in 3 consecutive<br />

years and the broadleaf weeds that initially colonised were short-lived and some native <strong>grass</strong>es began to establish (Liebert 1996).<br />

Grech (2007a) found that set-stocking combined with flupropanate spraying resulted in more bare ground and an increase in<br />

infestations. Of the range <strong>of</strong> herbicide and stocking options examined, flupropanate combined with strategic grazing and pasture<br />

rehabilitation provided the best control. Grech et al. (2009b) found that low rate treatments with flupropanate (0.25 and 0.75 L<br />

Ha -1 ) we ineffective in controlling N. neesiana seedlings. Grech et al. (2009a) found that flupropanate at 2 L Ha -1 effectively<br />

controlled N. trichotoma in pot trials, but not N. neesiana, and that a range <strong>of</strong> native and exotic <strong>grass</strong>es was unaffected apart<br />

from a transient decline in growth.<br />

A major disadvantage <strong>of</strong> flupropanate is the creation <strong>of</strong> bare ground that persists for long periods (Snell et al. 2007). These areas<br />

may be prone to subsequent reinvasion.<br />

2,2-DPA<br />

2,2-DPA is an halogenated alkanoic acid which acts by precipitation <strong>of</strong> protein (Tomlin 1997). It is a systemic herbicide<br />

absorbed by leaves and roots, used mostly for control <strong>of</strong> annual and perennial <strong>grass</strong>es (Tomlin 1997). It is selective for some<br />

<strong>grass</strong>es at low rates, and at high rates provides non-selective control <strong>of</strong> monocots (Parsons and Cuthbertson 1992). It is generally<br />

considered to be less effective and useful than the two most favoured herbicides, and does considerably more damage to nontarget<br />

species than flupropanate (Michelmore 2003). Pritchard (2002) found it quickly killed foliage, but 45 weeks after<br />

application had only reduced the number <strong>of</strong> tussocks by 40%. Hartley (1994) found that 2,2-DPA reduced seed production by<br />

90-99%, but detected resistance to 2,2-DPA in New Zealand after 2 years <strong>of</strong> annual or biannual application.<br />

Hexazinone<br />

Hexazinone is an inhibitor <strong>of</strong> photosynthesis and is a non-selective contact herbicide, absorbed by leaves and roots (Tomlin<br />

1997), mainly the latter (Parsons and Cuthbertson 1992). It has a long residual life in soil (Parsons and Cuthbertson 1992) and<br />

maintains bare ground for long periods, and is available commonly in granular preparations.<br />

Triazines<br />

Atrazine is a triazine chemical which acts by inhibiting photosynthesis. It is a water soluble, selective systemic herbicide,<br />

absorbed mainly through the roots but also through foliage, mainly used to control broadleaf weeds and annual <strong>grass</strong>es (Tomlin<br />

1997). It is relatively rapid acting and has pronounced residual effects for 6 months or more after application (Parsons and<br />

Cuthbertson 1992). Simazine is another triazine compound that acts by inhibiting photosynthesis. It is mainly root-absorbed and<br />

provides selective pre-emergence control <strong>of</strong> <strong>grass</strong>es and broad-leaved weeds, with long residual control at high application rates<br />

(Parsons and Cuthbertson 1992). Pritchard (2002) found that both atrazine and simazine application at the boot stage resulted in<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!